Figment632
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,078
That was the logical next step if you're a company considering expanding to all of the major markets around the globe (Brazil being the only other reasonable choice I think)
Australia just doesn't seem to be what Disney is aiming for. Shanghai and its suburbs has more people than all of Australia, by comparison. That's what Disney is aiming for...
I think Disney considers Australia part of the market for Hong Kong, Tokyo, Shanghai, and Anaheim, though plenty seem to come to Orlando, too. Just not enough population in the Land Down Under for a Disneyland Down Under.
They sure seem to be shelling out the benjamins now, don't they? Didn't realize Disney had so much capital to spend on so many expansion projects. DCA, Shanghai, Fantasyland, Avatarland, India...
And still the Yeti languishes.![]()
I think Disney considers Australia part of the market for Hong Kong, Tokyo, Shanghai, and Anaheim, though plenty seem to come to Orlando, too. Just not enough population in the Land Down Under for a Disneyland Down Under.
They sure seem to be shelling out the benjamins now, don't they? Didn't realize Disney had so much capital to spend on so many expansion projects. DCA, Shanghai, Fantasyland, Avatarland, India...
And still the Yeti languishes.![]()
I personally feel that India is a bad move if they are considering a park for several reasons.
I personally would not call India stable, without going into politics there are very high tensions between India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan. Much of India lives in severe poverty, the threat of terrorism is also very real.
You would also need to look at who would be coming to the park, much of the country would be unable to afford to visit and many people have reservations about visiting India in general.
One thing I would say about Australia is while it does not have a huge population, it is surrounded by many countries that have a large enough population to sustain a park down under. If a park were to be constructed in Queensland, it would be close enough for many Asian countries that it wouldn't be a whole lot different than people traveling from any northern state here in the US to Florida.
yes, but people in those Asian countries will already have choices between Hong Kong, Tokyo and Shanghai
And yet they still flock to WDW.
I wonder what percentage of overseas visitors to WDW visit from Asia -- and I mean fly from Asia to Florida specifically to visit Disney World, not folks who live or study here and happen to visit while living in the U.S.
I'd bet it's not as high as you think. It's a VERY long set of flights from anywhere in Asia to Florida, plus you have to stop over somewhere -- there's nothing direct. They're more inclined to visit the Disney parks there and, for the overseas trip, Disneyland in California.
I work with Characters (which Japanese people seem to love!) and honestly it's like anything else it has ups and downs.
I wouldn't say its as many as we get Brits or South Americans however there are some periods where there are very very large spikes in the numbers of Asian visitors. I would be curious as to how many Asian visitors hit Disneyland compared to WDW.
They quite often take pictures of characters from Tokyo and bring a picture to WDW and have them sign, they often come with gifts from Tokyo as well and give them to many of the characters.
India makes perfect sense. It's the world's largest democracy and has 1/5 of the world's population. Construction and operating costs will be far cheaper then another park in North America and therefore admission costs will likely be far cheaper too. India's trying to rival China industrially and even though it lags behind, it's workforce is much better educated and speaks english.
People have mentioned stability ... well India has it's issues, but in many ways it is much more stable then the US. It's economy is booming and it has a rapdidly growing middle class, both great enticements for Disney.