Disney lays off 100 -- falling attendance blamed

wdwguide

Ex Guide Book Author
Joined
Mar 19, 2001
Messages
1,441
Disney lays off 100 -- falling attendance blamed

By Jeff Oliver | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted July 1, 2003

Walt Disney World laid off some of its craft and maintenance workers Monday for the first time in nine years, as theme-park attendance continues to languish, the company and union officials said.

The giant resort, in consultation with the workers' bargaining unit, laid off about 100 of the skilled laborers but also restored the remaining employees' 40-hour workweeks.

The decision to resort to layoffs to eliminate reduced work schedules followed a week of discussion between Disney and the Craft Maintenance Council, the umbrella group that represents the unionized workers, said Rena Callahan, a Disney spokeswoman.

The laid-off workers, mostly carpenters and decorators, constitute about 2.5 percent of the 4,000 craft and maintenance employees at Disney, which has a total work force in excess of 50,000 people.

Monday's action reversed a previous agreement between Disney and the council. That agreement, reached in March, had stipulated that union members would work, on average, 35-hour workweeks in lieu of layoffs.

Disney cut many of its employees' hours in the months following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but the agreement in March had formalized Disney's right to reduce the hours of full-time employees represented by the Craft Maintenance Council. That agreement also extended the council's current contract for another year, with the promise of a 3 percent pay raise this fall.

But the council always viewed the reduced work schedules as a temporary measure, until business at the resort rebounded. The shorter workweeks threatened to affect some full-time employees' benefits and eligibility for pension credits and welfare, said Joseph Maloney, a union official in Washington, D.C.

"We were hoping it was going to be a short-term initiative," he said, but "the latest round of attendance shows there is a decrease, . . . and something had to be done."

"It's unfortunate that layoffs are inevitable," he added. "It's just attendance is low -- it's nobody's fault."

Callahan said the number of work hours lost through the layoffs would be redistributed among the remaining craft and maintenance employees. She said the layoffs were made based on seniority.

"These type of decisions are always very difficult to make," Callahan said. "This is the option that served the greater good."

The job cuts are the first involving the craft and maintenance work force at Disney World since 1994, according to Helen Corbett, a union spokeswoman.

Attendance at Disney, which began dropping in early 2001, fell even faster after the September 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., led to a nationwide slump in travel.

While many theme-park operators expected, or at least hoped, that sluggish attendance figures would improve this year with the end of the war with Iraq, an increase is now looking less likely, said Jim Cammisa, publisher of Travel Industry Indicators, an industry newsletter based in Miami.

Cammisa said that, based on hotel occupancy, tax revenue and other indicators, theme-park attendance is probably down 3 percent so far this year compared with 2002. And attendance last year was down 5 percent from 2001.

Jeff Oliver can be reached at joliver@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5490.


Copyright © 2003, Orlando Sentinel
 
4000 men working 35 hr weeks is 140,000 man hrs per week. 3900 men,restored to 40 hrs is 156,000 man hours. Doesn't seem like you're saving anything.
 
Take out 100 employees worth of benefits and I can guarantee there's some savings there...
 
I don't know 'bout that. 16000 man hrs times just $10.00 is $160,000.00 x 4 weeks is $640,000.00 That's a helluva befinit package for 100 employees.

Since they laid off by seniority, they lost the cheaper people and are now paying more hrs at a higher rate.

These layed off guys will also collect unemployement,which if Fl is anything like NJ, will still cost the ex-employer and good percentage.

I think this was more a union thing then an attendance issue.
 

I just picked a round number. If anything I think $10.00 is low for a union carpenter.
 
but it'd seem to me with each employee there's health insurance costs, life insurance costs, dental, vision, workman's comp, LT disability, ST disability, paid vacation and sick time, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid - you name it! Employers pick up a huge tab for each employee they have on staff. Reduce some of those employees and those costs vanish. I cant be sure if it makes up for the $160,000 per week in salary saved, but I gotta believe it was factored in the equation someway, somehow. Just bringing up as something to consider.
 
And, keep in mind that will more workers - comes more training and supervision. I assume Disney is a company that would much rather spend some coin on keeping their workers educated and updated on the latest OSHA rules & regs. - then pay fines and settlements. Let's say that they spend $50/month per employee for "safety & training". That pays for a couple of full time people. And then you eliminate the need for supervisors for these 100 folks - so you save the additional cost of..... lets say 8-10 "supervisors". And everyone else is right... "benefits" can really add up. For a Union employee making $10.00/hour, you can assume there is at least $3.00/hour in cost to the company over and above this with taxes & benefits. Remember.... unions are very demanding when it comes to sick days, vacation days, family leave days.

Plus, by restoring many of the 3900 other workers back to full time status - you make them happy.

Realistically, this is a smart move on Disney's part. Thousands of people have been laid off over the last couple of years. The fact that Disney can get by laying off 2.5% of their "Skilled Carpenters" speaks volumes - considering many places have eliminated 10-20% of their workforce.
 
***The shorter workweeks threatened to affect some full-time employees' benefits and eligibility for pension credits and welfare, said Joseph Maloney, a union official in Washington, D.C. ***

I think this is a telling statement.
 
Telling indeed....

It goes a long way in justifying the apparent lack of benefit to Disney by increasing work hours for the remaining employees...

I guess what's real interesting in this article and we've overlooked it so far is that:

a. Disney and the Union met for over a week on this issue, and,

b. it was the Union rep that said attendance was the problem.

I think by them meeting so long, the Union must have gleaned some little bit of insight into Disney's operations and current status to come out with the attendance excuse. Honestly, I'm confused by this whole thing. In Vikings scenario of actually doling out more salary, maybe Disney is setting themselves up for future negotiations with the Unions...
 
Originally posted by CWIPPERMAN

. Thousands of people have been laid off over the last couple of years. The fact that Disney can get by laying off 2.5% of their "Skilled Carpenters" speaks volumes - considering many places have eliminated 10-20% of their workforce.

Too bad Disney's entire work force is not made up of "Skilled Carpenters" or that number might mean something. Remember Disney has been hacking away at one group or another all the way back to 2001.
 
What I meant by "you assumed they all make the same" is if you layoff 100 workers make 50,000 a year and up the workweek for an employee making 35,000 a year you will save money.
 
I heard that the reduction is in no way a cost saving measure and that it's actually costing them money. There is no financial reason involved, what-so-ever. I heard the last 100 guys hired were simply very ugly...
 
Originally posted by Golter
What I meant by "you assumed they all make the same" is if you layoff 100 workers make 50,000 a year and up the workweek for an employee making 35,000 a year you will save money.

I think that is faulty thinking. Remember they laid off those by seniority- I would assume that means those with LESS seniority therefore they wouldn't have been making MORE than those that still have full time jobs there now, right??
 
100 is an oddly round number. Sounds like it's out of a hat.
 
This was simply a political issue between union & Disney. The article stated that certain senior members were going to have their benifits take a hit if they weren't restored to 40 hrs. as far as the union was concerned,the 100 newbies were expendable.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE











DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom