minniecarousel
Chris Isaak fan
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2000
- Messages
- 13,925
I'm so sorry for your loss.
Business or not I find it ludicrous that DIS'ers are actually saying that Disney is somehow OK here. The OP is absolutely correct. These slugs do anything they can to project family values and take every dollar they can from us in the name of family entertainment - but must follow the 'letter of the law' when one of their own has the worst kind of tradgey imaginable.
Shame on you folks defending Disney and shame on Disney.
I've never used this oft misguided phrase before but I will now, Walt must be rolling over in his grave.
No, that won't help. Those in her office do not have the training nor the tools to help you find what you need. They'll just be really nice to you and be sympathetic. You don't need that right now.
You need to go to the head of HR, the ones who deal with benefits. Ask about other benefits, tell them what you need as a Disney family. Ask them if there is a fund for this sort of thing. Ask them what others have done in your position. Ask them why it isn't clearly stated that you get less of a monetary amount due to the age of your child dying. Clearly that isn't what you thought you were paying for. Ask the hard questions calmly and in a "I'm really needing this info" manner. Try to not lose your head, as hard as that sounds.
I am sorry for your loss but there are parts of the story that are missing. If you have an insurance policy and unless Disney is listed as the beneficiary then you get whatever the value of the policy is, unless Disney is the underwriter for the policy and then it is possible that they only pay out $500. Did you read your policy? If you have a policy through an actual insurance company, Disney can't dictate what that company pays to you unless the policy was written that way. Something is missing here.
I'm really not looking to get into a debate on Corporate Responsibility concerning employee benefits on this particular thread. It seems that would be rather heartless, considering that the OP just lost her child.
I'm simply saying that her post makes more sense to me now, being that our insurance obtained through my husband's employer contains similar restrictions. After her clarification, I have a better sense of what she is experiencing.
Again OP, I'm very sorry for your loss.
I'm sorry but I still fail to see how this is Disney's "fault".![]()
There is a difference in being heartless, and just doing what is Standard Operating Procedure. This isn't Disney's policy, this is any life insurance policy.
jadynne - Please ask around for whether there is anything like this. Disney is not completely heartless and there have been instances when they have taken care of their own. I'm sorry for your heartbreak.![]()
Actually, it is Disney that puts the restriction on the amt not our life insurance provider. We've spoken to them they were willing to pay the entire amt but Disney only authorized them to pay $500.00. We were never told this when we purchased the policy. They also tried not to give my husband fmla coverage, We had to go to the labor board and file a grievance just to get them to follow the law!