It might be terrible for you. But it would be fair for Disney. What incentive does Disney have in perpetuating the existence of the "super-user" when it retired a system whose primary flaw was the ability of some to take advantage of most? That's sort of like saying: "Let's create a egalitarian system.....and then hide some Easter Eggs so that a few people retain a distinct advantage." I can understand why someone here would get all "Bwah-ha-ha-ha" over that. But if you were the system designer at WDW, wouldn't you want the entire world to be clued in to the way your new OS works, and wouldn't you want the entire world to make good use of all the features and sing its praises? Honestly, do you think that there was a meeting in a conference room where a group of execs made the conscious decision to notify people 55 days in advance specifically so that chat board shut-ins would have a one week advantage? I suppose anything is possible, but I am having a hard time buying into this level of conspiracy.