Disney bought Pixar!

SaratogaShan

DIS Veteran
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
703
I just heard on the radio that Disney bought Pixar. Wow...what a turn around from not even having a friendly working relationship. I suppose we can look forward to a new era of top notch Disney animation (Computer generated as it is...) I am sure many more future theme park attractions will be built around popular Pixar characters....It's all good with me! :thumbsup2
 
SaratogaShan said:
I just heard on the radio that Disney bought Pixar. I suppose we can look forward to a new era of top notch Disney animation (Computer generated as it is...) :thumbsup2

Lets hope that Bob Iger and Disney have the wisdom to LEAVE THE SUCCESS AT PIXAR ALONE and not mess it up by trying to control them or screw with it too much.
Disney has not had anything close to the creativity and ingenuity of the staff at Pixar. Disney movies over the recent years have proven that.
I believe this is a good move for Disney and hope it proves well for Pixar as well.
Certainly a welcoming sign on the departure of Eisner.
 

With Jobs getting a seat on the Disney board and Catmull heading all of Disney animation it I sure that the Pixar development philosophy will survive.

What I'm hoping this means is more of the Pixar characters in the parks. Our kids love them and I'm sure Disney hasn't been pushing them because they never knew if they would make another movie.

A lot of Apple rumor boards are covering this deal too because of Jobs connection to Apple.

This article, http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1489, is some comments from Iger and Jobs. The most interesting one is:

Jobs said Pixar has been holding back from announcing its next slate of feature animation films and is now is discussing when to make the official announcement. "Nothing has been decided yet," he said.
 
valeriekc said:
Lets hope that Bob Iger and Disney have the wisdom to LEAVE THE SUCCESS AT PIXAR ALONE and not mess it up by trying to control them or screw with it too much.
Disney has not had anything close to the creativity and ingenuity of the staff at Pixar. Disney movies over the recent years have proven that.
I believe this is a good move for Disney and hope it proves well for Pixar as well.
Certainly a welcoming sign on the departure of Eisner.


The way it sounds is that Pixar is taking over DI and Lassiter is heading it all up including the parks .He is the Creative guru behind Pixar that left Disney Animation due to personality conflicts that are gone now.

This can only be a step in the right direction for the parks to become cutting edge once again.

And yes they have made some great things happen over the past couple years but have made some major mistakes as well.
 
Looks like GREAT animation will be coming back to Disney...yipeeeeeeeeeeeee! :mickeyjum :goofy: :donald: :dumbo:


Disney buys Pixar
House of Mouse is teaming up with Pixar in a $7.4 billion deal. Steve Jobs to become board member at Disney.
By Paul R. La Monica, CNNMoney.com senior writer
January 24, 2006: 7:17 PM EST



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - Mickey Mouse and Nemo are now corporate cousins. Walt Disney has announced that it is buying Pixar, the animated studio led by Apple head Steve Jobs, in a deal worth $7.4 billion.

Speculation about a deal being imminent raged on Wall Street for the past few weeks. Disney has released all of Pixar's films so far, but the companies' current distribution deal was set to expire following the release of this summer's "Cars." The merger brings together Disney's historic franchise of animated characters, such as Mickey, Minnie Mouse and Donald Duck, with Pixar's stable of cartoon hits, including the two "Toy Story" films, "Finding Nemo" and "The Incredibles."

"Disney and Pixar can now collaborate without the barriers that come from two different companies with two different sets of shareholders," said Jobs in a statement. "Now, everyone can focus on what is most important, creating innovative stories, characters and films that delight millions of people around the world."

As part of the deal, Jobs will become a board member of Disney, the companies said. And John Lasseter, the highly respected creative director at Pixar who had previously worked for Disney, will rejoin the House of Mouse as chief creative officer for the company's combined animated studios and will also help oversee the design for new attractions at Disney theme parks.

"The addition of Pixar significantly enhances Disney animation, which is a critical creative engine for driving growth across our businesses," said Disney CEO Robert Iger in a written statement.

During a conference call with analysts Tuesday, Iger said that acquisition discussions had been going on for the past several months. Jobs added that after a "lot of soul searching," he came to the conclusion that it made the most sense for Pixar to align itself with Disney permanently instead of trying to distribute films on its own or sign with another movie studio partner.

According to the terms of the deal, Disney (Research) will issue 2.3 shares for each Pixar share. Based on Tuesday's closing prices, that values Pixar at $59.78 a share, about a 4 percent premium to Pixar's current stock price. Shares of Pixar (Research) fell slightly in regular trading on the Nasdaq Tuesday but gained nearly 3 percent in after-hours trading. The stock has surged more than 10 percent so far this year on takeover speculation.

Disney's stock gained 1.8 percent in regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange and was flat after-hours.

Prior to the deal's announcement, some Wall Street observers had speculated that Disney may be paying too much for Pixar. A source tells FORTUNE that some Disney board members also thought the price was too high.

To that end, Disney chief financial officer Thomas Skaggs said during the conference call that the deal would reduce Disney's earnings slightly in fiscal 2006, which ends this September, as well as fiscal 2007. He added though that Pixar should add to earnings by fiscal 2008 and that Disney was still on track to post annual double-digit percentage gains in earnings through 2008.

But one hedge fund manager said that the risk of Disney losing Pixar was too great.

"The question isn't did Disney pay too much but how expensive would it have been for Disney if Pixar fell into someone else's hands," said Barry Ritholtz, chief investment officer with Ritholtz Capital Partners, a hedge fund that focuses on media and technology stocks.

Jeffrey Logsdon, an analyst with Harris Nesbitt, agreed with that assessment. He said that Pixar's "success quotient" justified the price of the deal.

Pixar has yet to have a flop with its six animated movies. They have grossed more than $3.2 billion worldwide, according to movie tracking research firm Box Office Mojo.

Disney, however, has struggled in the computer-generated animated movie arena. Even though its most recent CG-animated film, "Chicken Little" performed better than many had expected at the box office, it was not as big a hit as any of the Pixar films.

"Robert Iger has made no secret of the fact that he wanted to get the animated business back to where it was. It's what Disney has known for but the movies they did in-house did not do as well as the ones they did with Pixar," said Michael Cuggino, a fund manager who owns about 100,000 shares of Disney in the Permanent Portfolio and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth funds.

Pixar has yet to announce what movies it is working on after "Cars," however. It is believed that Pixar's next film about a rat living in a fancy Parisian restaurant, tentatively titled "Ratatouille" may be released on 2007 and that a "Toy Story 3" may be in the works as well. Jobs said during the conference call that nothing has been decided about future Pixar releases yet, but added that the company feels strongly about making sequels to some of its previous hits.

And Iger said that announced plans for Disney-produced animated films, including the release of "American Dog" in 2008 and "Rapunzel Unbraided" in 2009, are still on track.

It would have been unthinkable to imagine Disney and Pixar teaming up just a few years ago. The two companies broke-off talks to extend their current distribution agreement in 2004 due to a strained relationship between Jobs and former Disney CEO Michael Eisner. But since Iger succeeded Eisner last year, he has extended an olive branch to Jobs.

Disney and Apple have already announced several online programming deals during the past few months. Disney now has agreements in place to sell hit ABC prime time shows, such as "Desperate Housewives" and "Lost", as well as content from ABC Sports and ESPN on Apple's popular iTunes music and video store.

Cuggino said the addition of Jobs, who will also become Disney's largest individual shareholder, to Disney's board could mean that more innovative digital deals could be in the works. "Jobs is a dynamic personality who knows consumer electronics. It's an opportunity to bring some youthful energetic thinking to Disney's board."

Disney, like many other large media companies, has seen its stock price stagnate during the past year as investors have flocked to more rapidly growing digital media firms such as Apple as well as search engines Google (Research) and Yahoo! (Research)

But Logsdon said the acquisition of Pixar could help Disney increase revenue throughout all of its business lines. So even though some may be quibbling in the short-term about how much Disney had to spend, he thinks Disney made the right move.

"It's a smart strategic deal," Logsdon said. "The benefit in theme parks, consumer products and cable will probably make this deal look a lot smarter a year or two from now."
 
Speculation about a deal being imminent raged on Wall Street for the past few weeks. Disney has released all of Pixar's films so far, but the companies' current distribution deal was set to expire following the release of this summer's "Cars." The merger brings together Disney's historic franchise of animated characters, such as Mickey, Minnie Mouse and Donald Duck, with Pixar's stable of cartoon hits, including the two "Toy Story" films, "Finding Nemo" and "The Incredibles."

That's kinda confusing- well the last sentence anyway. Makes it sound like Disney had NOTHING to do with Toy story, Finding Nemo and the Incredibles... yet we know they did release those together and in fact those movies are incorporated into the theme parks already with characters to greet/meet, Turtle Talk, etc. Strange wayof them wording it.... the "merger" bringing those characters together when they were already together. Hmmm.. odd.
 
Those last movies were pixar creations, distributed by Disney, so in a way they are being brought together under a bigger roof. The most interesting part of this deal will be seeing how Jobs influences Disney as it's largest stockholder and board member. It just may infuse a bit of much needed life.

Drew
 
DFi just called and told me, too bad I hadn't got on here earlier and found out. Looks like the new year is going to be an interesting one for Walt Disney in every field. Think we will see more 'pixar' inspired attractions pop up in the parks? Finally! I want the Incredibles and a Monster's Inc one!
 
So far, I think this is exciting news...I'm not sure about Steve Jobs, but I'm very excited about John Lassiter being put in charge of Imagineering in the films and theme parks.

A little worried about the seven BILLION this cost Disney, but with the luck it'll be worth the extra $$$ tickets are sure to cost somewhere down the road.
 
BibbidyBobbidyBoo said:
That's kinda confusing- well the last sentence anyway. Makes it sound like Disney had NOTHING to do with Toy story, Finding Nemo and the Incredibles... yet we know they did release those together and in fact those movies are incorporated into the theme parks already with characters to greet/meet, Turtle Talk, etc. Strange wayof them wording it.... the "merger" bringing those characters together when they were already together. Hmmm.. odd.
Yeah Disney already owned all rights the pixar characters.
 
Baloo said:
As part of the deal, Jobs will become a board member of Disney, the companies said. And John Lasseter, the highly respected creative director at Pixar who had previously worked for Disney, will rejoin the House of Mouse as chief creative officer for the company's combined animated studios and will also help oversee the design for new attractions at Disney theme parks.

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am with everybody on wanting a Monsters Inc. ride. party:
 
Now that Tarzan is closed, maybe Pixar might be moving something into that theater... I agree, this is a great thing for Disney and the parks!
And maybe this will really get the ball moving on a character breakfast at MGM now! To Breakfast and Beyond! :-)
 
BibbidyBobbidyBoo said:
That's kinda confusing- well the last sentence anyway. Makes it sound like Disney had NOTHING to do with Toy story, Finding Nemo and the Incredibles... yet we know they did release those together and in fact those movies are incorporated into the theme parks already with characters to greet/meet, Turtle Talk, etc. Strange wayof them wording it.... the "merger" bringing those characters together when they were already together. Hmmm.. odd.

Actually, the only film Disney had any real say in storywise was Toy Story. The other films, Disney just distributed, and only had a say in content. Disney and Pixar had a merchandising deal, which is why they can sell Nemo at World of Disney and The Disney Store. Same goes for the theme park attractions. As for the release of the films, Disney did not creatively work on these projects (except Toy Story)
 
JRawkSteady said:
Actually, the only film Disney had any real say in storywise was Toy Story. The other films, Disney just distributed, and only had a say in content. Disney and Pixar had a merchandising deal, which is why they can sell Nemo at World of Disney and The Disney Store. Same goes for the theme park attractions. As for the release of the films, Disney did not creatively work on these projects (except Toy Story)
While they didn't work creatively on the other films they did co finance all of them. In addition it is far more than a merchandising deal. Disney essentialy had total rights to use the characters anyway they wanted. Including making sequels to the films without Pixar.
 
This is true, but they didn't originally create the characters is what I was getting at.
 
Does this mean they don't have to say " A Walt Disney Pictures presentation of a Pixar Studios animated film" anymore? Because that really bothers me for some reason.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom