No not really since we have the Polynesian Island Tower as a fine example of what ugly looks like. No real theming beyond some painted side walls that are so subtle that almost no one even notices. Just a massive Concrete mass like any generic hotel.Love how many are jumping to conclusions based on just started construction.
We obviously have different tastes. I watched that tower being built (I'm local) and in its final form. I think it works well as a finished product.No not really since we have the Polynesian Island Tower as a fine example of what ugly looks like. No real theming beyond some painted side walls that are so subtle that almost no one even notices. Just a massive Concrete mass like any generic hotel.
Dave
I knew you would bring up the Contemporary which was built some 55 years ago as a futuristic style but it did have a specific design point with a massive atrium and the monorail running through it.But, if you want to talk about a massive concrete mass, that's my opinion of the Contemporary. Do you like that building?
Lakeshore won’t be as tall as Island Tower, and the concept art looked like it might have more stone and wood than island. Island would look a lot better if it was farther from the shore and not squeezed between the nearby buildings.No not really since we have the Polynesian Island Tower as a fine example of what ugly looks like.
Sorry but it will be 10 stories tall just like the Island Tower. Please go back and read some of the press, some even reported that it might be 12 stories tall which it will not be.Lakeshore won’t be as tall as Island Tower, and the concept art looked like it might have more stone and wood than island. Island would look a lot better if it was farther from the shore and not squeezed between the nearby buildings.
Love how many are jumping to conclusions based on just started construction.
And I've already seen posts here, on FB and other forums on how to keep "those campers" out, this is really insulting for so many reasons. Many folks spend more on their RV than people pay for their DVC membership. Most people stay at FW, not to try to have a cheap vacation, but because they choose to camp, they enjoy that style of vacation.
Yikes feel a little entitled do you?Yeah, @proudmomof4, I feel sorry for the folks that claim they want to keep campers out. Campers would go to WL/CC/BRV easily ALREADY and enjoy those guest amenities but we don't by-and-large because we don't give a rat's rear end about lesser amenities. We DO go to eat at other resorts just like any other guests on property though.
My campsite at Fort Wilderness is as big as the all outdoors. DVC guest are trapped in their parakeet cages and long to get out of them wherever they can like their pool. Campers can strike up a conversation with other campers easily but hotel folks don't really mix/mingle too much unless they're already friends or family. It's more obvious that they're projecting about coming into the Fort Wilderness space to enjoy The Wilderness or even consume some strawberry shortcake at Hoop Dee Doo Review. We all know which direction will have the net guest flows and it won't be to the lame chicken wing DVC resort.
It's easy to stay away from R*********s because there's nothing there I want that I can't have. I might want to dine there possibly (I will at least once to try it). But I'm still waiting for someone to say that the Fort Wilderness Eyesore (E*****e) DVC will have something I care about. We sleep "at home" on vacation nearly everywhere we go. DVC guests can't say that ("oh we can transfer into a 3rd party plan"). Uh huh, sure
. Go with that
). You can sleep at WDW but for us WDW vets, that's no reason to throw good money after bad.
Bama Ed
PS - oh and 'mom, all those virtuous E*****e guests are going to stay on their side of the line on Halloween night right?
![]()
![]()
Disney Lakeshore Lodge Update: Guest Room Construction Underway at Sprawling Fort Wilderness
Portion of Lakeshore Lodge past Crockett’s Tavern
Lakeshore Lodge starting to ride above Crockett’s Tavern
I’m still pretty sure it’s not going to be 10 stories tall. All the concept art shows five or six at most.As the imposing 10-story hotel structure continues to rise at the upcoming Disney Lakeshore Lodge hotel at Fort Wilderness, early work has begun on what we assume will be some waterfront cabins.
Yi
Yikes feel a little entitled do you?
For someone contributing $100 per night to park your trailer/RV at the Fort, you sure have a lot demands of what Disney does with their prime land. Ciao!Entitled to enjoy one of the ORIGINAL WDW resorts from 1971?
![]()
Without some ugly/non-similar exterior design relic hulking over Walt's classic? Well, .... yeah. Duh.
And I note that no one has denied that the rear balconies facing Trails End are a chicken wing's throw away and that no has said that it is NOT an eyesore. <queue the rush>
The main reaction seems to be that everyone else seems to be silent in being glad that THEIR sacred cow is not being gored. But I can't get over why all the DVC owners trapped in their canary cages are so HYPED UP to get out into the Fort acreage and enjoy the wide open spaces.
But as we all know, sacred cows make the best (tasting) hamburger.
So don't change. I love ya'll just the way you are.
Eventually people will hold their nose and buy E*****e because it's all there is (besides the one over by CBR and Poly). But it may take decades of lame excitement to make it happen. With enough discounts, etc., though, the DVC beast will be fed. Like I proposed over a year ago, they might hitch the DVC Skittles cabins to E*****e to try to level out maintenance fees.
![]()
It's a lame, bland resort design. And it was six years ago too.
Oh and let me close by saying that "Everyone's entitled to my opinion".
Ciao!![]()