Marseeya said:
You're right.
When I was on food stamps, it was actually a pretty large amount of money we were able to get (Pennsylvania, I believe, used to have the most liberal system). Let's put it this way -- it was more than what we had spent on groceries (food alone) before DH left us. So, I was able to buy good cuts of meats, and just plain good foods. But when it became evident that I could buy treats as well, then yes, I certainly bought ice cream or cookies, and even the rare soda. After that, I still ended up having money left over at the end of the month. So the people who saw me buying the junk had no clue whatsoever what was in my cupboards at home. Then again, I wasn't complaining to some cashier that I couldn't buy food for the kids.
I think this is part of the problem. Here, my neighbor- mom, 2 girls age 6 & 9 get just over $400 a month in food stamps- I know this because she told me. Feeding 3 people on 400 a month. However, she is only feeding the 3 of them dinner 7 nights a week, and breakfast and lunch on 2, I know this because her children receive free breakfast and lunch at school. $400 for 7 dinners, 2 breakfasts and 2 lunches- plus snacks, she generally has $ left over at the end of the month.
Part of the problem, is that a lot of people who receive public assistance, don't have the knowledge, to make the educated choices of buying healthier foods. And, to add to that, if you were to buy 100% good for you food, your food bill would be a lot higher than if you bought frozen- less healthy foods.
Take a walk over to the budget board- there are posts regarding grocery bills, and more often than not, when people make the switch to healthier, fresh foods- they have an increase in their grocery bills. It's cheaper to buy frozen vegetables or canned vegetables than it is to buy fresh ones.
Their is also the possiblity that they are not equiped to prepare fresh foods. Cooking a can of corn, is a lot easier than cooking fresh green beans- face it- its a fact of life. Their are quite a few people on public assistance that are under-educated.
The thing that really irriates me is people who assume because someone is on public assistance they are abusing the situation- yes I know plenty who do- and it pisses me off, however I also know plenty that don't- that are trying to make their lives better, that are on assistance due to events they had litte to do with, and even littler control over.
When I was 3 and my parents divorced- my mom went to college. We lived on campus at Keene State, in family housing. My dad paid $15 a week in child support- when he paid...my mom went on 'welfare' as it was called at that time. She maxed out her student loans, applied for every grant that was available (not much back in the early 80's) and relied on the food stamps to feed my brother and I. She didnt abuse the system, and upon graduation and getting a full time job- she went off all assistance. While in school- full time, she also worked part time as a waitress to supplement what she got. The program worked as it was intended for. She didnt want to be divorced but life with an alcoholic isnt all its cracked up to be....she made the choice to go back to school, and took advantage of what was available to her. The system can and does work (for some)
Brandy