Indeed. they aint in no hurry.Nothing like claiming you're going to invest in the parks in a "turbocharged" way and then it's really you're going to invest in the parks by the end of this decade.
Okay, yeah, "ability to predict revenues and expenses" is a reasonable theory for what "visibility" means in this context. Thanks.https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/warner-bros-discovery-revenues-1235640322/
Wiedenfels also warned the sluggish linear TV advertising market may not markedly improve any time soon, and visibility for the studio’s TV production business was hampered by the Hollywood actors strike. “This is an evolving process and there is a real risk at this point that some negative financial impact of the strike will extend into 2024 to some extent,” he told analysts.
Maybe he means they won't be able to issue accurate guidance or something. But you're correct, it doesn't make much sense.
Usually is only included in the filings with the SEC. That may not be filed for another 2-3 weeks based upon their recent history when they file their full annual report.“Parks and Experiences overall remains a growth story, and we are managing our portfolio exceptionally well,” Iger said.
He added, “even in the case of Walt Disney World, where we have a tough comparison to the prior year, when you look at this year’s numbers compared to pre-pandemic levels in fiscal ’19, we have seen growth in revenue and operating income of over 25 and 30%, respectively.”
No mention of attendance figures? Not raw numbers; I know that Disney doesn't release those. But weren't we expecting increase/decrease percentages?
My guess is they can't be that good as Iger avoided the question about it. I don't see it getting much better as there is next to nothing new coming for closer to 10 years.“Parks and Experiences overall remains a growth story, and we are managing our portfolio exceptionally well,” Iger said.
He added, “even in the case of Walt Disney World, where we have a tough comparison to the prior year, when you look at this year’s numbers compared to pre-pandemic levels in fiscal ’19, we have seen growth in revenue and operating income of over 25 and 30%, respectively.”
No mention of attendance figures? Not raw numbers; I know that Disney doesn't release those. But weren't we expecting increase/decrease percentages?
30% growth in operating income at WDW vs 2019. I think attendance is an after thought at this time.My guess is they can't be that good as Iger avoided the question about it. I don't see it getting much better as there is next to nothing new coming for closer to 10 years.
What does that mean?dividend declared
CFO Kevin Lansberry said in the earnings call that they would recommend to the board that a dividend be paid by the end of the calendar year. No amount was mentioned.What does that mean?
Also, I really feel like Iger needs to be given the boot IMMEDIATELY, because there’s is NO FREAKING WAY we are waiting for new attractions and etc. in the back half of the next decade! He has failed us fans now!
EDIT: Forget what I said. It came from Kevin Lansberry's mouth, and he’s about to get replaced by Hugh Johnston, who’s likely to speed up the timeline of the investment.
CFO Kevin Lansberry said in the earnings call that they would recommend to the board that a dividend be paid by the end of the calendar year. No amount was mentioned.
I went over the numbers we have so far and the call went about as expected. The only real niggle for me is that I had higher expectations for the Direct to Consumer division's bottom line. Wall Street seems to have responded well to the sub growth but I thought they would be closer to break-even. Then the guidance was less bullish that I expected.Some remarks from the earnings call that I haven't seen posted:
"We continue to expect to reach profitability at our combined streaming businesses in Q4 of fiscal 2024. Although as we have mentioned in the past, we don't expect linear progress from quarter to quarter. While we expect entertainment B2C operating losses in Q1 to be generally in line with Q4 due to higher sports rights costs at ESPN+ aligned with the start of the NHL season. We anticipate a modest sequential decline in Q1 for the combined streaming business. But as we have also said previously, we anticipate upward momentum later in the fiscal year to be driven by realizing the full impact of price increases, the launch of the ad tier internationally, and subscriber growth."
"to the first question, the trajectory of DTC, we're not going to get specific -- we're not giving any guidance beyond our guidance about becoming profitable at the end of '24."
"One thing that we have recently really come to appreciate is the performance of our big title films, the so-called Pay 1 window films on the service. Elemental is one. Guardians of the Galaxy 3 was another. Little Mermaid, the third. The numbers are huge. That's a differentiator for us, certainly, when it comes to competing with Netflix, for instance, which is the gold standard. But by leaning more into some of those films and while we improve the quality of them, gives us the ability to dial back a bit on some of the spending and investment in series. And that blend of spending between films and series, we believe, gives an opportunity to increase our margins and grow the business."
Overall impressions are that it is the same things they have been saying for years. The goal to achieve profitability in streaming DTC (ESPN+ did report profitability during the quarter) is Q4 2024 and to do expect it sooner. Q1 according to them will be around the same $400M loss for streaming as they won't see the full price increase and content cuts for a few quarters.
Content cuts to Disney+ seem permanent and their comments about Pay 1 window movies would back that up. This is a smart decision. Some people may say that they need to make more content for Disney Plus but in my opinion, it does not matter where content comes from, as long as new content does get added. These movies act as new content for a lot of people and for the most part, are going to be higher quality than the content produced for the service.
Their wording of profitability happening in 2024 has always struck me as Q4. I don't expect breakeven before that and could see a reversal in Q1 2025 based on how much content they have for that quarter. I am bullish on the DTC business overall but their lingo has always struck me as "we'll have one quarter in 2024 that will appease shareholders".I went over the numbers we have so far and the call went about as expected. The only real niggle for me is that I had higher expectations for the Direct to Consumer division's bottom line. Wall Street seems to have responded well to the sub growth but I thought they would be closer to break-even. Then the guidance was less bullish that I expected.
I thought Q1FY24 would be the 1st break-even quarter for the DTC division but now I think we wait till at least Q2.
As you noted above, ESPN+ was in the black even with depreciation included. A nice feat and there is runway for higher prices for the app.
Cash in hand increased to $14B. Cash flow generated over the last FY was best since pre-pandemic and a dividend is returning.
Correct, $1.76/share for the full year, paid in two installments. If we get half that amount, I will be surprised.My guess is it will be <.88/share. I think that was the last payout in 2020.
I concur with your disappointment in the parks spending. If you read the entire transcript, notice how little the parks were talked about by both Iger and Lansberry. That indicates to me that they plan to continue wringing as much money out of the guests as possible, while skimping on parks staffing. Recall, there was something in the call about parks' "wage inflation."The back end turbo charge in the parks is disappointing as I would have liked to see it ramp up now, especially with cash flow improving as much as it has. It seems as though they are content on letting Epic Universe open and than a year or two later trying to steal its thunder with new attractions, lands, etc. We'll see how everything goes but onto the next quarter.
Yeah, you are correct that the language has stated end of FY24 but the SG & A savings they found almost instantly were very encouraging. Last quarter they still had $150m/quarter in savings to go to realize the $3B/yr reduction in SG & A spend and they had not seen any of the $2.5B savings from content spend reductions.Their wording of profitability happening in 2024 has always struck me as Q4. I don't expect breakeven before that and could see a reversal in Q1 2025 based on how much content they have for that quarter.