Brian Noble
Gratefully in Recovery
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2004
- Messages
- 17,883
To be fair, he did get hit upside the head with the pandemic shortly after taking the job. A lot was probably his fault, but not all of it.
That is true, we like to blame old Bob C. for everything but between the pandemic and the streaming transition, that no legacy competitor has been able to handle well, he did not have a chance.To be fair, he did get hit upside the head with the pandemic shortly after taking the job. A lot was probably his fault, but not all of it.
I suppose but profiting so greatly from a mistake Bob I. is almost solely responsible for, does not really sit well with me. He installed Bob C. without proper board vetting or a true search for other candidates. A nice reward for causing the mess in the first place...Good for Bob. He had a lot of work to do unwinding all the things that went so wrong under Chapeck
It's the board's job to pick the successor, not the incumbent.He installed Bob C. without proper board vetting or a true search for other candidates. A nice reward for causing the mess in the first place...
Many in depth articles over the summer described a quick process where Bob I. was the real decider. Bob C. had one very brief discussion with one board member before he was hired. Hardly proper due diligence.It's the board's job to pick the successor, not the incumbent.
I thought there was quite the emphasis on this in Disney's Proxy and 10K. The company is making a big point about succession planning.Disney's succession plans in focus ahead of earnings
Disney removed all India Disney+ Hotstar subscribers off their books, due the merger with Reliance, and made more money. It seems I was right all those months ago.RE: Disney+ Hotstar
Disney+ Hotstar clients have only produced $0.59/mo per user over the last 2 reported quarters.
Tech costs alone run Disney about $1.25 to $1.30 per user per month.
Every single Hotstar subscriber that cancels is a net positive for Disney's bottom line.