DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

ehhhh i think there are many reasons for that.

I havent seen a disney movie in the theaters in a few years, its got nothing to do with politics or the "slant" that people claim they have.
I got a DVC membership extra to see Strange World last year during a trip.....
If it hadn't been free and come with food, I would have said I paid to much....

The kids liked it.....
The kids got free food

It was worth what I paid....

Overall, Disney's new direction, of classic movie remakes has even offended my kids.

I Hope somebody comes along and steers the ship back to the middle of the channel....
 
Yeah Ant Man is Marvel’s first “Dud” in the post Endgame Era. Eternals probably would join the list but it released when theatrical performance was even lower than it is now globally.
I remember thinking it was crazy that they released an Ant Man movie and then it ended up being crazier that it did well. Unreal that they got three movies out of the character.
 
People are already outraged about a Disney movie whose trailer hasn’t even released yet because of a production photo and a couple of blown out of proportion comments from an actress.

Or take "Elemental." Remember the people who angrily boycotted the film because it supposedly had a non-binary character? Yeah, the person who voiced Lake said that was their interpretation of the character, but obviously none of the boycott proponents took the time to actually watch the movie before they went off on a tear about it. (Who would have guessed???)

Well, I did just watch the movie on Disney+, and here is the entire exchange about Lake:

Wade: “That’s my little sib Lake and her girlfriend Ghibli. They’re students at Element City School for the Arts.”

Lake: “Following in Mom’s wake.”


That. Is. It. Three sentences. Female pronoun. No dialog with Lake saying, "Hey, everybody! I'm non-binary! Like it or lump it!" So not only would it be ridiculous to boycott a film simply because it had a non-binary character, that reason didn't even exist in this film.

Like you said, Bry and Hokie, some people are just looking for things to complain about. :sad2:
 
Or take "Elemental." Remember the people who angrily boycotted the film because it supposedly had a non-binary character?

Elemental ended up redeeming itself in later weekends and internationally. It's currently sitting directly above Cars in terms of box office. So, pretty amazing, considering the "poor" opening weekend and bad press.

https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/production-company/Pixar#production_company_movies_overview=od5

I actually went to see it in theaters and while I didn't think it was Pixar's best, it wasn't their worst either.

I do think Pixar has lost some of their mojo since Lasseter. Coco still remains the most original/creative to me of the newer films, but everyone is different.
 

Recon what it is then? Poor acting or casting? Poor stories or writing? Poor release timing? Iger told us at the first of the year, it was to be a jam-up box office for DIS this year. So far, not so much.

"Looking ahead, we are excited about our fantastic lineup of new films coming to theaters this year, starting with next week’s release of Marvel’s Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania, followed by other highly anticipated theatrical titles including The Little Mermaid, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, Pixar’s Elemental, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, and Disney’s Haunted Mansion."

https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/app/uploads/2023/01/q1-fy23-earnings-transcript.pdf
Not sure what it is. I enjoyed Encanto, but the other movies just havent been it for me
 
https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/09/19/disney-just-slashed-its-streaming-subscriber-targe/

Disney Just Slashed Its Streaming Subscriber Target. Should You Be Worried?
By Jeremy Bowman–Sep 19, 2023 at 7:09AM

Key Points

According to Bloomberg, Disney no longer expects to reach 215 million-245 million Disney+ subscribers next year.

The wide miss on a target from last year is the latest strategic error at the company.

The news comes as the company has shifted its focus to streaming profitability.

The company could fall well short of an earlier subscriber goal.

Disney+, the flagship streaming service from Walt Disney Company (DIS -0.65%), dazzled Wall Street investors through its early stages. The company blew past the initial subscriber forecast of 10 million at its launch in November 2019, and sign-ups continued to soar through the pandemic.

However, more recently, subscriber growth has hit a wall and Disney has jacked up prices on its streaming services to make up for a large shortfall on the bottom line.
Now, according to Bloomberg, Disney says that it will fall short of earlier subscriber targets it had given for 2024. In August 2022, it was aiming for 215 million-245 million subscribers at Disney+ by the following year.

The revelation looks like the latest setback for the entertainment giant, which just resolved a contract dispute with Charter Communications. Disney agreed to allow its streaming services to be included in Charter's bundles, which looks like more of a win for the cable operator than for Disney. The agreement will add some subscribers for Disney, but it will make less money from them than it would have selling directly to the consumer.

The news that it will miss its subscriber target shouldn't come as a big surprise. The service it refers to as Disney+ Core, which doesn't include Disney+ Hotstar subscribers primarily in India, added just 800,000 subscribers in the second quarter to reach 105.7 million. Disney+ Hotstar subscribers, meanwhile, fell by 12.5 million in the quarter to 40.4 million as the company lost the rights to broadcast Disney's top cricket league, the Indian Premier League.

In other words, even adjusting for the loss of cricket, Disney+ is barely growing, so adding 70 million subscribers by next year seems virtually impossible. Disney+ Hotstar also costs a fraction of the regular Disney+ service, so it's not to the bottom line of the streaming business.

Priorities have shifted

Just as they have in the rest of the tech sector, streaming stock investors have moved their focus from top-line growth or subscriber growth over to the bottom line. Legacy media companies like Disney are still burning hundreds of millions of dollars a year on streaming, and Wall Street is demanding that they prove that these businesses can be viable.

Disney stock is now hovering near 52-week lows even as the broader market has surged this year. While Disney is losing money on streaming, its linear TV business is rapidly shrinking with operating income in the segment down 23% to $1.9 billion in its most recent quarter.

The biggest imperative for the company at this point is to stem the declining profits in its media and entertainment division. CEO Bob Iger seems squarely focused on that, with the company announcing another round of price hikes at its streaming service to drive profitability in its direct-to-consumer segment by 2024.

Correcting the record

Disney underpriced the Disney+ service launch, charging just $6.99/month at the time. And while it's built a considerable audience for the service, a money-losing streaming service was never the goal. Now, monetizing it is especially vital as it sees its profits dry up in linear TV.

Disney still has some other cards up its sleeve. The company is planning to launch an all-streaming version of its flagship sports network ESPN, though it's unclear when that might happen. Meanwhile, Iger has floated the idea of selling non-core media assets, including ABC, and Bloomberg also reported that the company was holding talks with Nexstar on a possible sale of ABC.

Such a move could help Disney pay down some of its $47 billion debt burden, a large chunk of which came from its Fox acquisition, which looks increasingly questionable as the company muddles through its transition to streaming.

Stepping back from the subscriber target isn't a problem in and of itself, but it's a reflection of larger strategic failure at Disney. This includes the mispricing of Disney+, the questionable Fox acquisition, handing the reins to former CEO Bob Chapek before taking them back, and kowtowing to cable providers in the Charter deal.

Disney doesn't seem to know how to adequately value its content outside of the cable ecosystem, but the company needs to figure it out soon as cord-cutting will only continue to eat into its linear TV income stream. The streaming business should eventually be profitable, but things seem likely to get worse before they get better.

Jeremy Bowman has positions in Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
 
Walt Disney Company Form 8-K

The Walt Disney Company is providing the following update regarding its plans for capital expenditures at its Disney Parks, Experiences and Products (“DPEP”) segment. The Company is developing plans to accelerate and expand investment in its DPEP segment, to nearly double, as compared to the previous approximately 10-year period, consolidated capital expenditures for the segment over the course of an approximately 10-year period to approximately $60 billion in aggregate, including by investing in expanding and enhancing domestic and international parks and cruise line capacity, prioritizing projects anticipated to generate strong returns, consistent with the Company’s continuing approach to allocate capital in a disciplined and balanced manner.
We believe that the Company’s financial condition is strong and that its cash balances, other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to capital markets and borrowing capacity under current bank facilities, taken together, provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements, contractual obligations, upcoming debt maturities as well as future capital expenditures related to the expansion of existing businesses and development of new projects.
Slides related to this matter are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.


Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements and information in this Form 8-K may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding financial, performance or growth expectations (including future financial condition and available funding resources); business plans, strategic priorities and drivers of growth and profitability; capital expenditures and allocation; and other statements that are not historical in nature. Any information that is not historical in nature included in this 8-K is subject to change. These statements are made on the basis of management’s views and assumptions regarding future events and business performance as of the time the statements are made. Management does not undertake any obligation to update these statements.
Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Such differences may result from actions taken by the Company, including restructuring or strategic initiatives (including capital investments, asset acquisitions or dispositions, new or expanded business lines or cessation of certain operations), our execution of our business plans (including the content we create and IP we invest in, our pricing decisions, our cost structure and our management and other personnel decisions), our ability to quickly execute on cost rationalization while preserving revenue, the discovery of additional information or other business decisions, including based on the results of execution of our business plans, as well as from developments beyond the Company’s control, including:
•the occurrence of subsequent events;
•further deterioration in domestic and global economic conditions or a failure of conditions to improve as anticipated;
•deterioration in or pressures from competitive conditions, including competition to create or acquire content, competition for talent and competition for advertising revenue;
•consumer preferences and acceptance of our content, offerings, pricing model and price increases, and corresponding subscriber additions and churn, and the market for advertising sales on our DTC services and linear networks;
•health concerns and their impact on our businesses and productions;
•international, political or military developments;
•regulatory and legal developments;
•technological developments;
•labor markets and activities, including work stoppages;
•adverse weather conditions or natural disasters; and availability of content.


IMG_2359.jpegIMG_2358.jpeg


IMG_2357.jpegIMG_2356.jpegIMG_2360.jpeg
IMG_2361.jpeg

IMG_2362.jpeg
 
Recon what it is then? Poor acting or casting? Poor stories or writing? Poor release timing? Iger told us at the first of the year, it was to be a jam-up box office for DIS this year. So far, not so much.

"Looking ahead, we are excited about our fantastic lineup of new films coming to theaters this year, starting with next week’s release of Marvel’s Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania, followed by other highly anticipated theatrical titles including The Little Mermaid, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, Pixar’s Elemental, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, and Disney’s Haunted Mansion."

https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/app/uploads/2023/01/q1-fy23-earnings-transcript.pdf
I can say for us, we haven't seen a movie in a theater since December of 2019. Reasons, movies are coming out on the streaming services at a quicker pace than before. So, while it use to be a movie would be in a theater for a bit and then home release would be anywhere from 6 months to 1 year after it its run in a movie theater. Now movies are hitting video and streaming services within 3 to 5 months of release.

We also don't feel that going to see a movie in a theater is a good value any longer. When it is now costing $30+ for 2 people to go see a matinee, it just isn't' worth it to us any longer.

So, it is not the bad writing or poor stories, we are just willing to wait the short time it will take to hit streaming. The pandemic changed so many things and going to the movies is one of them, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Plus, the number of tickets sold have been declining for decades.

Psy
 
Walt Disney Company Form 8-K

The Walt Disney Company is providing the following update regarding its plans for capital expenditures at its Disney Parks, Experiences and Products (“DPEP”) segment. The Company is developing plans to accelerate and expand investment in its DPEP segment, to nearly double, as compared to the previous approximately 10-year period, consolidated capital expenditures for the segment over the course of an approximately 10-year period to approximately $60 billion in aggregate, including by investing in expanding and enhancing domestic and international parks and cruise line capacity, prioritizing projects anticipated to generate strong returns, consistent with the Company’s continuing approach to allocate capital in a disciplined and balanced manner.
We believe that the Company’s financial condition is strong and that its cash balances, other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to capital markets and borrowing capacity under current bank facilities, taken together, provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements, contractual obligations, upcoming debt maturities as well as future capital expenditures related to the expansion of existing businesses and development of new projects.
Slides related to this matter are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.


Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements and information in this Form 8-K may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding financial, performance or growth expectations (including future financial condition and available funding resources); business plans, strategic priorities and drivers of growth and profitability; capital expenditures and allocation; and other statements that are not historical in nature. Any information that is not historical in nature included in this 8-K is subject to change. These statements are made on the basis of management’s views and assumptions regarding future events and business performance as of the time the statements are made. Management does not undertake any obligation to update these statements.
Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Such differences may result from actions taken by the Company, including restructuring or strategic initiatives (including capital investments, asset acquisitions or dispositions, new or expanded business lines or cessation of certain operations), our execution of our business plans (including the content we create and IP we invest in, our pricing decisions, our cost structure and our management and other personnel decisions), our ability to quickly execute on cost rationalization while preserving revenue, the discovery of additional information or other business decisions, including based on the results of execution of our business plans, as well as from developments beyond the Company’s control, including:
•the occurrence of subsequent events;
•further deterioration in domestic and global economic conditions or a failure of conditions to improve as anticipated;
•deterioration in or pressures from competitive conditions, including competition to create or acquire content, competition for talent and competition for advertising revenue;
•consumer preferences and acceptance of our content, offerings, pricing model and price increases, and corresponding subscriber additions and churn, and the market for advertising sales on our DTC services and linear networks;
•health concerns and their impact on our businesses and productions;
•international, political or military developments;
•regulatory and legal developments;
•technological developments;
•labor markets and activities, including work stoppages;
•adverse weather conditions or natural disasters; and availability of content.


View attachment 795182View attachment 795183


View attachment 795184View attachment 795185View attachment 795186
View attachment 795187

View attachment 795188
This is nice news to wake up to.
 
It's kinda like repairing a surviver 57 chevy...... doesn't matter how nicer of a job you do, people still know you ****ed up a good thing to do it....
This makes no sense.

Most of the animated movies are based on or took influence from a short story or other literary work of art. By your definition than, those movies should also offend people because "people still know you ****ed up a godd thing to do it".

Have all the remakes been good, absolutely not but I dare say the majority of them have been solid if not outright great.
 
This makes no sense.

Most of the animated movies are based on or took influence from a short story or other literary work of art. By your definition than, those movies should also offend people because "people still know you ****ed up a godd thing to do it".

Have all the remakes been good, absolutely not but I dare say the majority of them have been solid if not outright great.
I'm sorry you don't agree with my opinion on what art is ?
 
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/19/dis...investment-in-parks-and-cruises-business.html

Disney plans to nearly double its investment in parks and cruises business

Published Tue, Sep 19 2023 - 9:00 AM EDT
Lillian Rizzo@Lilliannnn

Key Points
  • Disney said Tuesday it would nearly double its planned investment to roughly $60 billion in its parks business.
  • Theme parks have been a relative bright spot while the company struggles to make a profit on streaming.
  • Still, domestic parks, particularly Walt Disney World in Florida, have seen a slowdown in attendance and hotel room purchases.
In this article
Disney said in a securities filing Tuesday it will nearly double its planned investment to roughly $60 billion over the course of 10 years.

Shares fell more than 2% in early trading.

While the company is grappling with the changing media and entertainment landscape – and trying to make its streaming business profitable while considering sales of its traditional TV networks – the theme parks, experiences and products division has been a bright spot.

Still, the company’s domestic parks, particularly Walt Disney World in Florida, have seen a slowdown in attendance and hotel room purchases. Instead, the segment’s strength has come from its international parks. During the third quarter the division saw a 13% increase in revenue to $8.3 billion.

Disney will lean on its brands and intellectual property as it builds out its theme parks. The company planned to unveil more details about the investment at its investor day Tuesday.

“Today, as Disney considers future growth opportunities, there is a deep well of stories that have yet to be fully explored in its theme parks,” the company said in Tuesday’s presentation, noting “Frozen” and “Zootopia”-themed attractions at its parks outside of the U.S. in Hong Kong, Paris, Tokyo and Shanghai.

Shortly after Bob Iger returned as CEO, Disney announced changes to its parks prompted by complaints from guests regarding rising prices and longer wait times.

Disney highlighted the historical results of the parks and experiences business since 2017 on the back of heightened investment. Disney’s parks, like its peers, suffered during the lockdowns of the pandemic.

Rivals, including Comcast’s Universal parks in Florida, experienced a similar slowdown.

The heightened investment comes as Disney has been embroiled in lawsuits with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, which could affect its proposed expansion of the Orlando location over the coming years.

Earlier this year, Disney filed a lawsuit against DeSantis, accusing the governor and new board members of its special district of carrying out a campaign of political retribution against the entertainment company.

Soon after, Disney doubled down on its Florida park and said it would continue to invest and expand its Florida theme park over the next 10 years. In May, Disney said it was set to invest $17 billion in the Florida hub, which would include the potential creation of 13,000 jobs.

The Florida governor, who is now running for president, targeted Disney’s special district after the company publicly criticized a controversial Florida bill – dubbed “Don’t Say Gay” by critics – that limits the discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in classrooms.

Earlier this month, Disney dropped all but its free speech claims against DeSantis, focusing solely on the First Amendment claim that the governor politically retaliated against the company.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC.
 
Hopefully the previously announced $17B for WDW is still in tack and not allocated to other parks or cruise line in this $60B number.
Some of that may be dependent upon cooperation between Disney and CFTOD with any expansion plans if there are additional infrastructure requirements.

In the short term being Disney will likely look elsewhere to more favorable relationships for projects.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/19/business/media/disney-parks-expansion.html

Disney, Challenged Elsewhere, Plans to Spend $60 Billion on Parks and Cruises

Amid uncertainty for the company’s film and TV divisions, the investment over the next decade doubles the outlay in the last 10 years.
By Brooks Barnes
Reporting from Lake Buena Vista, Fla.
Sept. 19, 2023, 9:02 a.m. EDT

Disney’s theme parks will generate an estimated $10 billion in profit this year, up from $2.2 billion a decade ago. Not bad for a 68-year-old business, especially considering the devastation wrought by the pandemic just a couple of years ago.

But how much boom is left?

Last month, when Robert A. Iger, Disney’s chief executive officer, singled out the parks division as “a key growth engine” on an earnings-related conference call, Wall Street furrowed its brow. Disneyland in Anaheim, Calif., has long been viewed as maxed out, with little room to expand. Walt Disney World near Orlando, Fla., has become a question mark, given that Mr. Iger has said the company’s legal battle with Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, could imperil $17 billion in planned expansion at the resort over the next decade. Disney’s overseas parks — aside from Tokyo Disney Resort, which it receives royalties from but does not own — have sometimes struggled to turn a profit.

On Tuesday, Disney offered a clearer picture of the opportunity it sees, which can only be described as colossal: The company disclosed in a security filing that it planned to spend roughly $60 billion over the next decade to expand its domestic and international parks and to continue building Disney Cruise Line. That amount is double what Disney spent on parks and the cruise line over the past decade, which was itself a period of greatly increased investment.

In the past decade, Disney has opened the Shanghai Disney Resort, more than doubled its cruise line capacity and added rides based on intellectual properties like “Star Wars,” “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Tron,” Spider-Man, “Avatar” and “Toy Story” to its domestic parks. Disney has also poured money into its Paris and Hong Kong parks, with themed expansions tied to “Frozen” and other Disney films scheduled to open soon. Three more ocean liners are on the way, bringing the Disney fleet to eight ships, and Disney is nearing completion of a new port on a Bahamian island. (Disney already has one private island port.)

If that is what $30 billion can buy, imagine what $60 billion might bring.

“There are far fewer limits to our parks business than people think,” Mr. Iger said in an email.

“The growth trajectory is very compelling if we do nothing beyond what we have already committed,” he continued, referring to attractions and ships that have been announced but are not yet operational. “By dramatically increasing our investment — building big, being ambitious, maintaining quality and high standards and using our most popular I.P. — it will be turbocharged.”

Image

Josh D’Amaro, chairman of the parks division, noted that films like “Coco” and “Zootopia” had not yet been incorporated into the parks in a meaningful way.Credit...Todd Anderson for The New York Times

Disney is expanding the investment after a stretch of trouble in almost all its divisions.

Cable television, including ESPN, has become a shadow of its former self, the result of cord cutting, advertising weakness and rising sports programming costs. Disney had a disappointing summer at the box office, with movies like “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” and “Haunted Mansion” selling sharply fewer tickets than anticipated. The company’s Disney+ streaming service continues to lose money; Mr. Iger has said it will be profitable by fall 2024, but some investors are skeptical.

Disney shares closed on Monday at $85. Their price was $197 in 2021.

In contrast, Disney’s parks and cruise business has been a bright spot, in many ways propping up the whole company. In the most recent quarter, Disney Parks, Experiences and Products generated $2.4 billion in operating income, an 11 percent increase from a year earlier. Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution had $1.1 billion in operating profit, an 18 percent decline.

Spending per guest at Disney parks has increased 42 percent since 2019, in part because of higher prices for tickets, food, merchandise and hotel rooms.


“The stock is cheap given how good the parks are,” Michael Nathanson, an analyst at SVB MoffettNathanson, said on Monday, before the expansion was announced.

Still, increased investment in theme parks brings increased risk. It is a business that will always be sensitive to factors beyond Disney’s control: swings in the economy, gas prices, hurricanes, earthquakes, tension between the United States and China. Disney has greatly increased security, deploying undercover guards and installing metal detectors, but these teeming resorts — Disney parks attracted an estimated 121 million visitors last year — could become ghost towns if a violent event took place.

Josh D’Amaro, chairman of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, said people who focused on such risks overlooked the resilience of theme park fans. He noted that customers had come flooding back when Disney parks reopened during the pandemic.

“Every time there has been a moment of crisis or concern, we have managed to bounce back faster than anyone expected,” he said.

Mr. D’Amaro declined to specify how the company planned to spend the $60 billion. But he gave hints, noting that Disney movies like “Coco,” “Zootopia,” “Encanto” and others had not yet been incorporated into the company’s parks in meaningful ways.

“Imagine bringing Wakanda to life,” he said, referring to the fictional “Black Panther” kingdom. “In terms of bringing the latest Disney-Marvel-Pixar intellectual property to the parks, we haven’t come close to scratching the surface. And we have learned that incorporating Disney I.P. increases the return on investment significantly.”

Disney owns 1,000 undeveloped acres across its existing theme park resorts, Mr. D’Amaro noted. (For comparison, he said, that’s the size of seven Disneylands.) One of the biggest areas of opportunity, he said, involves the original Disneyland, which opened in 1955. If the company can persuade the City of Anaheim to change a plan, adopted in the 1990s, that limits where hotels, parking lots and attractions can be built, Disney intends to redevelop land adjacent to Disneyland, greatly expanding capacity. Disney also plans to turn a parking area south of the park into a themed shopping, dining and hotel district.

Disney released a 17,000-page environmental impact study for the project last week. The Anaheim City Council is expected to vote on the changes in mid- to late 2024.
How much Disney invests in Florida may depend on the courts, where the company is battling Mr. DeSantis and his allies for control over Disney World’s growth plan. Angered over Disney’s criticism of a Florida education law, Mr. DeSantis in April ended the company’s long-held ability to self-govern its 25,000-acre resort as if it were a county. Disney maintains that prior contracts preserve its ability to control development, however.

“We want to keep growing and investing and have ambitious plans in Florida,” Mr. D’Amaro said. “For the benefit of our guests, our cast members and the economy of central Florida, we hope the conditions will be there for us to do so.” He declined to comment further.

At the moment, Disney does not plan to build parks in new countries or cities. (In the past, the company looked at building a park in India, for instance, and expanding beyond Hong Kong and Shanghai in China.) Rather, the company will focus on developing new ports for its ships.

Starting in 2025, a new cruise ship — the biggest in Disney’s fleet so far, with space for more than 6,000 guests — will be based in Singapore. Disney’s ships have grown increasingly themed, with characters and artwork from franchises like “Frozen,” “Star Wars” and Marvel’s Avengers incorporated into restaurants and entertainment zones.

“It’s like bringing a theme park to a new part of the world,” Mr. D’Amaro said of Disney
Cruise Line, which has recently been booked to 98 percent of capacity.

Brooks Barnes covers all things Hollywood for The New York Times. He has reported on the entertainment business for two decades and lives in Los Angeles. More about Brooks Barnes
 
“Imagine bringing Wakanda to life,” he said, referring to the fictional “Black Panther” kingdom. “In terms of bringing the latest Disney-Marvel-Pixar intellectual property to the parks, we haven’t come close to scratching the surface. And we have learned that incorporating Disney I.P. increases the return on investment significantly.”

That's what I'm talking about, baby!
 



New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top