I think all paying guest should still get the 90 day +10 day window but the guest who get the free dining a shorter window say excample 80day+10
just an idea
I doubt very seriously that Disney will ever give DVC Members the ability to book ADRs before all their other onsite guests. Disney needs those cash guests. And wouldn't you feel slighted if you were a cash guest and found out that DVC Members could book earlier, considering what a cash Disney room costs? What they could do, and I don't see it happening either, but they could give Deluxe and DVC guests a 100+10 day window, moderate guests a 95+10 day window and value guests the 90+10 with offsite having a firm 90. But Disney has always been careful not to distinguish between the classes of resort guests as far as treatment in the parks and access to dining. The difference has always been in the amenities offered at the specific resort. It just isn't "Disney-like" to discriminate further. And imagine the computer problems they may have if they implemented tiered dates based on your resort reservation. Disney has such a massive computer system, any "upgrade" in one program can cause programs for other programs that interact with the same data files.
I did read that yesterday there were some computer glitches on the dining system. Many folks called back late yesterday afternoon and could then book the places they could not get into. OP, try again.
I agree with Doc, I too call the dining number at 7:00AM. I was luck enough to call for a split stay Aug. 13 and changing on Aug. 16 and was allowed to make ALL of my ADRs to include the week of Aug. 16. I'm glad I did. We are staying at the BCV during Aug. 16th and knew if we wanted to eat TS, I had to call and get ADRs. I did manage LeCellier for lunch, but my others were not hard to get places (50s PT and Cape May for a party of 9). We are not on the DDP that trip.
I understand what you are saying. However, I wouldn't consider it a TIER. I would consider it a PERK, just like any other DVC discount. I don't think cash guest would consider it unfair. It's part of being a DVC member. I don't think non-members would (or should) be upset that we get $100 off of APs or 20% off of some restaurants. It's the perk of being a member and if they want the perk then they need to purchase into DVC.
As I have mentioned in my other posts, I don't think it would cost DVC financially to give us a Perk allowing us to call 180 days +10 for dining. I don't believe every member will take advantage of it, just like I don't take advantage of all perks, but it would be a great option. If members don't want to plan their dining that far in advance, then that's fine. But there are some of us, who do and would appreciate this PERK.
If is was so important for Disney to make no class distinctions, then all the resorts (although with different themes) would be the same price and with equal amenities. But that's not the case. It would be awful. What type would Disney choose? Values? Yes people would be able to afford it, but some would not like to stay there. Deluxe? They would be great resorts, but Disney would be pricing them above many people's means and so a lot of people would not be able to afford it. Moderates? Would have problems as well since some wouldn't be able to afford it while others may want something a little more.
As DVC members we already have advantages over non-members. We are given certain PERKS. I just wish 180 days+10 ADRs would also be included.I understand that this may not be such a problem during low season, but during the free dining period, it is essential.
The last time I made ADR's was when it was 180 days out. I understand that it's changed to 90 days now, but I don't understand the "90 + 10" rule. Does this mean you call 90 days before check-in and can make up to 10 days of ressies? Just need clarification.
They don't get upset if we get 100% off an AP because it doesn't affect them. If we get to jump ahead of them in the ADR line, that will affect them, and you can be sure they will think it unfair.I understand what you are saying. However, I wouldn't consider it a TIER. I would consider it a PERK, just like any other DVC discount. I don't think cash guest would consider it unfair. It's part of being a DVC member. I don't think non-members would (or should) be upset that we get $100 off of APs or 20% off of some restaurants. It's the perk of being a member and if they want the perk then they need to purchase into DVC.
But if they give people the option of 180+10, it forces everyone to book 180+10.n If members don't want to plan their dining that far in advance, then that's fine.
I understand what you are saying. However, I wouldn't consider it a TIER. I would consider it a PERK, just like any other DVC discount. I don't think cash guest would consider it unfair. It's part of being a DVC member. I don't think non-members would (or should) be upset that we get $100 off of APs or 20% off of some restaurants. It's the perk of being a member and if they want the perk then they need to purchase into DVC.
As I have mentioned in my other posts, I don't think it would cost DVC financially to give us a Perk allowing us to call 180 days +10 for dining. I don't believe every member will take advantage of it, just like I don't take advantage of all perks, but it would be a great option. If members don't want to plan their dining that far in advance, then that's fine. But there are some of us, who do and would appreciate this PERK.
If is was so important for Disney to make no class distinctions, then all the resorts (although with different themes) would be the same price and with equal amenities. But that's not the case. It would be awful. What type would Disney choose? Values? Yes people would be able to afford it, but some would not like to stay there. Deluxe? They would be great resorts, but Disney would be pricing them above many people's means and so a lot of people would not be able to afford it. Moderates? Would have problems as well since some wouldn't be able to afford it while others may want something a little more.
As DVC members we already have advantages over non-members. We are given certain PERKS. I just wish 180 days+10 ADRs would also be included.I understand that this may not be such a problem during low season, but during the free dining period, it is essential.
What is the code for calling WDW-DINE outside the US
and thanks never knew that they openned at 7am
we are at our 90 day window on Tue

I called today to make my ADR's for my trip (Aug.23-Sept.6), but because I am changing resorts, they would only let me make them for the first leg of the trip. I hung up and called back again, and asked another CM if they could "link" the reservations so I could take advantage of the 90+10 rule, but no luck! Now I have to call again on Sat. You can be sure that what I want won't be available. I could barely get what I wanted today. Free Dining definitely hurts DVCers! No doubt about it!
Discounts are quite different than booking perks. I can tell you, I'd be pretty upset if I were paying $400-$500 per night for a tower room at the Contemporary, but was blocked out of my dining times because 6 onsite resorts full of DVC Members were able to book the restaurants earlier.
And the advantage to Disney Restaurants would certainly be negligible, if there were any benefit to them at all.

They don't get upset if we get 100% off an AP because it doesn't affect them. If we get to jump ahead of them in the ADR line, that will affect them, and you can be sure they will think it unfair.
But if they give people the option of 180+10, it forces everyone to book 180+10.

And I would think it's futile to be upset about something to which they are not entitled. Isn't that just life?![]()
When I called last week for our 10-night split stay, the CM didn't *think* it would let me book for the entire stay, but she kept trying night by night "just in case", and the system let her make reservations for me for all 10 days (to her surprise). This was 90 days out from the first check-in day. Just FYI.
I think a cash guest WOULD consider it unfair because it directly impacts them.
Of course Disney makes distinctions based on what you pay. But they work very hard to keep those distinctions visible ONLY at the resort. If you are a GF Royal Palm concierge guest or a Pop guest, that doesn't matter outside your resort. You have the same access to everything. You know, when I was booking my honeymoon 11 years ago, I remember Disney had a key system to designate the levels its resorts fell into. Deluxe resorts like GF and Beach Club were 5 keys. Moderates were 3 keys. DVC resorts (only OKW and BWV at the time) were 4 keys. They've done away with this, but I do think the feeling that cash deluxe resorts trumps DVC resorts still exists, and it probably rightly should given the level of service (daily housekeeping, for instance).
Disney knows DVC members are in for life so there is no incentive to give them additional perks, particularly perks that impact other non-DVC guests. I think it's safe to assume that if Disney *did* want to give earlier dining access to groups, DVC would probably fall a bit lower in the priority list. Right now Disney really needs to bring in revenue, so those free dining guests who are paying big bucks for their rooms are highly prized. You never know - they could offer priority to free dining customers...because let's face it, they need to show good revenue. So be careful what you wish for...

You mean, like the lack of free dining and extended ADR time frames for DVC?
