Digital photo frame

spoon2003

DIS Veteran
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
609
Anybody own one, any recommendation? other than bigger is better, does size matter? would a smaller frame distort the view?

Looking to get one for DH's parent for Christmas. Don't want to spend a whole lot because I truly believe the prices will drop very quickly. Right now a 7 inch avg about $150 -200.

Thanks for any advice.

Sue
 
Just make sure that it doesn't require you to subscribe to a service. Some of the picture frames got their photos from a website, but you had to spend $10/month for access to the site.
 
Saw 3 different models at Staples today for $99.
They were just floor models (no electronics) so I couldn't judge quality. All of them took SD and one of them read CF and memory stick.
Guess this is the Xmas of the digital picture frame.
 

spoon2003 said:
Anybody own one, any recommendation? other than bigger is better, does size matter? would a smaller frame distort the view?

Looking to get one for DH's parent for Christmas. Don't want to spend a whole lot because I truly believe the prices will drop very quickly. Right now a 7 inch avg about $150 -200.

Thanks for any advice.

Sue

I've yet to see one that didn't have horrid quality and was overpriced. ONe of them, (I forget which) requires a monthly fee to download photos.
 
digital photos frames seem to be all the rage this year. prices have really come down. the major disappointment is the low resolution of most of the screens. a common size is 320x240, called QVGA (quarter vga). actually most photos still look surprisingly good at this resolution. the good displays are 640x480 but these are much more expensive. before you buy make sure you see what the model you're buying looks like in person because the display quality varies tremendously.

the ceiva frames are the ones requiring a subscription but they target a different market. they are intended to be given to grandparents and include a dialup modem to automatically download new pictures from a web site every day. that's what the service fee is paying for.
 
I've been toying with the idea of building a grande sized one. I want to get a 32" LCD TV that accepts VGA input. I'll mount it inside of a large frame and conceal a mini-itx computer inside the frame. I'll run electrical to it and then mount the whole thing over the fireplace. I'm just waiting for 32" LCD TV's to drop a bit lower.
 
I picked my parents up a Ziga 8" for $99 (after rebate). It's 640x480, so I resize my pics before I put them on the chip to maximize the number. The quality's actually pretty good and it plays MP3s in the background (if you want). I send them a new chip every few months and they send me back the 'old' one (sometimes ;) ). For myself, I have a couple of old laptops around the house I 'retooled' that pull pics from a couple of folders on my server. Yeah, I'm a technogeek. :surfweb:
 
B00004ZCMW.01._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

A long time ago I picked up a Kodak Smart Frame (above) on clearance for maybe $118. At the time the smart frames were selling for ... get this .... $350! Then... after a period of great enjoyment (real "wiz-bang" fun back then) I had a problem. I don't recall what it was but the end result was it was slightly damaged. I listed it on eBay fully disclosing the problem plus my suggestion for a fix and it got $186! It was 5.4" diagonal in size and a beautiful little toy!

Since then I've played with the idea for several digital photo frames. I was unsatisfied with the "value" for the dollar for a long time having been "spoiled" by my $118 deal on the $350 smart frame. I've looked at LOTS of digital frames and even considered hacking an old notebook to create a super-smart photo frame with a 14 or 15" LCD screen. In the end that would have been the most impressive frame but it was too much work for a guy like me who is essentially all thumbs with things like that.

B000HWQ75I.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

(one suggestion) Recently however I was quite interested in a 7" diagonal Phillips Digital frame (photo above) on display at Best buy. It was only $189 or so and it looked nice. Cheap enough to be competitive with my 5.4" diagonal $118 Smart Frame. However I have NOT purchased one yet as I get by with a screen saver on my notebook AND... I'm really waiting for my spouse to consider getting me one for Christmas or ??? Oh yeah... and I am also secretly hoping she might get me a nice new DSLR to replace my trusty old 10D. THAT is pretty unlikely though... well... actually a near impossibility really. But I can dream a little eh?

504five.16.jpg

So... (suggestion two) a couple years ago MY solution to enjoying my photos on a screen was to buy what's arguably the worlds' first multi-media HDTV... the 57" Epson Livingstation. It had 720p resolution (the best at the time) and an unusual one of a kind 3 LCD panel rear projection system with a 8-10,000 hour user replacable bulb. Almost identical to what the Sony rear projection systems are trumpanting now. This was a "solution" to the common single LCD panel array with used a spinning color wheel to pulse the various primary colors needed to produce a full color picture. So.. the 3 LCD Epson system gained a claim for darker blacks AND greater black detail, plus it was free of the "rainbow effect" tought to plague single LCD panel systems with the spinning color wheel.

The Epson Livingstation also has an intergrated Dye-Sublimation printer and CDRW drive along with the expected memory card slots and dedicated photo managing controls on the remote and front panel. When we view our photos on the big screen it's a nice "wiz-bang" touch to be able to generate a print on the spot or burn the card contents to CD! They made 2 sizes (47 and 57) and two versions (P1 and P2 with HD tuner and matt screen to reduce the screen door effect - which I judged as being near undetectable on my P1). Costco used to offer the 57" on their on-line site for $3500... but I got mine locally with the matching stand. And it does not hurt that I consider the contemporary silver style to resemble something out of Star Trek - especially since I am a Star Trek / Sci Fi enthusiast.

So - my real recommendation is to simply find a HDTV which has good photo handling capabilites and use that from time to time to enjoy your pix on a really huge and SHARP screen. But if you wanna print proof sized 4x6 prints or burn to CD (or read from CD) then the Epson is the 1st and only choice. And it is more or less discountinued. I already bought 2 spare bulbs and 20 packs of paper with film refills to keep my Livingstation alive for a long time. I got the paper packs and one ulb for next to nothing on eBay. but... I'm still on my original bulb and only into my 4th film/paper pack!

So which HDTV would I suggest? I don't know as I have not shopped them lately. All I do know is the highly touted 1080p screens have very little 1080p source material. IE... it can display 1080p but the FCC standard is rigidly set at 720p Virtually all HDTV material is being shot at the 720p standard - and the only 1080p material is upsampled material that is burned to HD-DVD ... and only for the more expensive version of HD-DVD. Plus you have to pay extra for the 1080p HD-DVD players. So... my point is to ask WHY would anyone really want a 1080p HDTV screen if there is virtually no source material at that resolution? Except - does the 1080p screen display our digitial photos any more sharper then a 720p screen? Well - that would depend upon whether the photo image is output to screen at 720p or 1080p!... I suspect.

Anyways.... there's my 2 bits on the LCD exhibition ideas. I think you would get a lot more out of a HDTV with photo handling capabilities. BUT... if you want HDTV programming from satillate or cabel TV it's gonna cost you! I estimate I pay about $15 extra a month for the Time-Warner HD-DVR plus HD extended programming.

(Suggestion THREE) Last year I saw a huge digital photo exhibition using dozens of 42" plasma flat panels at the Getty Museum. I was totally impressed with that presentation. Which means you sould be able to run into your local Costco and pick up a nice plasma screen to hang on the wall to enjoy your photos, eh? For my tastes and home - I must have more utility from my photo exhibition toys if I am to spend $2000+ for a 50" HDTV plasma. Oh yeah... 42" HDTV plasma screens can be had for about $1300 at costco.com but ... for my taste... 42" would now represent a step down from my 57+ screen while a 50" plasma frame would be an acceptable size.

Speaking of which - we are considering a 600' add on expansion to the house. Half the space would be for a master bedroom and bath expansion. For this area I was thinking of adding a two way fireplace between the bathrooom and bedroom with a possible two way HDTV Plasma screen above or adjacent to it. The screen would be on a rotating mount that could enable viewing from either the bedroom or bathroom which is adjustable to serve several areas of the bath or bedroom.

OK... enuf is enuf.

Adios, for da moment :wave2: !
 
Captain...
You're giving DH an heart attack..a $100-200 picture frame morphing into HDTV and Plasma screen. :rotfl2:

Waiting for Black Friday Specials.

Thanks to all.

Sue
 
i've got 2 of the phillips, that i picked up in singapore, in our living room- one portrait mode showing a few hundred photos of the kids and family. and one landscape showing a few dozen scenes from around the world. they're set to change images after 5 minutes, shut off at 11pm, and turn on at 8:30. guests constantly comment about them.

i've had other generic frames from ebay but they've died one way or another not too long after getting them. a local shop, softwarecity, has an 8" frame for sale as part of their stock - so if anything happens i can return/exchange.

since i upgraded my kid's mac mini to my old g5 (since i upgraded to a MacPro), i'm going to hook up an old 15" lcd to it and put it in the kitchen/dining room area
 
I just started looking at these photo frames. Do I need to buy a memory card for the frame or do they have internal memory that I download pictures to?

I pretty much just know how to use our camera and download the pictures to the computer. Can I take pictures already on my PC and put them into one of these photo frames?

Sorry so basic but I'm not real techy, that's DH. I just don't want to buy something and have it be useless. I've been reading about the Phillips though
 
I just started researching as well...Seems like many come with internal memory as well as a card reader so you can use both. I'm looking at the Phillips too, althought it's on the more expensive side but I like the auto on/off and it has gotten good reviews. Let me know which one you decide on..I'm waiting to see if there will be any good deals on Black Friday.

Sue
 
For black friday ....

... Ritz camera has a 5.4" digital frame by SmartParts for $69.99; another one in 8.4" size for $149 and a 10.4" frame for $199.

.... and Circuit City has the same 5.4" digital frame for $49.99!!! Now will you be happy with a 5" diagonal image (I was for years with the Kodak Smart frame. Plus if you break it you'll not have to have a cow Like I did when mine was shorted out!)!!! :confused3

... at Target they have a TRUETECH 7" diagonal frame for $68. I'm having difficulty googling any tech specs on it though.

... and at Comp USA they have a Mustek PF-A700B 7-inch Digital Picture Frame for only $59.99. Pictured below. I'm not sure but the resolution seems somewhat low to me at 480x234. THat is something like 1/3rd VGA resolution - or 112,320 (o.11 Megapixels) resolution. By way of comparison the Phillips digital 7" frames are 480x800 resolution (and the SAME SIZE as these Musteks). THats' 384,000 (0.38 Megapixels) resolution. THe Smart Parts 5.4" frame is a 320x234 array. That's 74,880 resolution or a modest 0.075 megapixels. And the old Kodak Smart Frame that I had several years ago had a 640x480 (true VGA resolution) arry for 307,200 resolution or 0.3 megapixels.

COmpare these resolutions to a comon digital camera LCD screen that is 2.5" in size like the one on the Canon Poewershot A700. This LCD screen has 110,000 pixels resolution or 0.11 megapixels. So the Smart Parts digital frame has MUCH LOWER resolution (0.07MP) then your average digicam! And the Mustek 7" frame is larger and cheap but boasts resolution equal to your common tiny 2.5" digicam LCD screen at 0.11MP).

NOW WE KNOW why these LCD frames are being promoted... perhaps. But if you don't mind how they look for image qualty then they may represent this seasons' bargains for LCD frames. I still think you would be far better off with a 15.4" notwbook computer scrren in WXGA like the one beong touted at BEst Buy for $249. That's 1280 x 800 for precisely 1 megapixel at 1,024,000 resolution and it is a fully functional notebook computer. I suspect this is gonna be the sort of thing where you have to camp out over nite at the store in order to actually get one. SHOOT... it would only have been worth while to camp out for a PS3 in IMHO as folkjs where reselling those on eBay for 1000s in profit right after they got theirs! :rolleyes:

6a548926-f3d0-4751-9e47-f8c0aa331f6b.gif
 
spoon2003 said:
Captain...
You're giving DH an heart attack..a $100-200 picture frame morphing into HDTV and Plasma screen. :rotfl2:

Waiting for Black Friday Specials.

Thanks to all.

Sue

SUE...

Here is a "Black FRIDAY" deal on a Panasonic TH-42PX60U 42" Plasma HDTV from BEST BUY for only $999! Compared to spending $179 for a tiny 10.4" LCD frame... why NOT get a 42" Plasama screen? Of course, buying the mounting apparaatus, hiding the wiring and power in the wall and adding a USB CF card reader will cost extra! HEh-heh-hee!!!

7679185_ra.jpg

Enjoy a sharp, crisp picture on this 42" plasma TV that features Digital Cinema Reality for a theater-like experience right in your living room.


Learn more about the advantages of Panasonic Home Theater Systems (Flash demo)

An EZ-Sync compatible device. Learn more about Panasonic EZ-Sync technology.
Learn more about HDTV.




Built-In HDTV Tuner: Add HD-capable antenna to receive over-the-air high-definition broadcasts, where available. Optional set-top box required for high-definition cable or satellite programming.


HDMI inputs provide an uncompressed all-digital audio/video link for the highest-quality connection and supports copy-protected HD broadcast content


1024 x 768 pixel resolution, major DTV signals including 1080i, 720p and 480p



AND...

.... Office Depot has a Haier 42-inch Plasma HDTV for only $799. However, who on Earth is "Haier"??? Well... I googled the manufacturers' site and they make 3 plasma HDTVs in 42".
The HPE42USBB Black Belt series model has only 852 x 480 Resolution with no mention whether it handles 480p or 720p. The HPH42USBB model is also a BlackBet series with 1024 x 768 Resolution and again - no mention of 480p or 720p capability. These two are pictured below to the left. The 3rd model is 42EP14S with 852 x 480 Resolution and no mention whether it handles 480p or 720p. That one is pictured below to the right.

hph42usbb.jpg
42ep14s.jpg
 
captaincrash said:
So which HDTV would I suggest? I don't know as I have not shopped them lately. All I do know is the highly touted 1080p screens have very little 1080p source material. IE... it can display 1080p but the FCC standard is rigidly set at 720p Virtually all HDTV material is being shot at the 720p standard - and the only 1080p material is upsampled material that is burned to HD-DVD ... and only for the more expensive version of HD-DVD. Plus you have to pay extra for the 1080p HD-DVD players. So... my point is to ask WHY would anyone really want a 1080p HDTV screen if there is virtually no source material at that resolution? Except - does the 1080p screen display our digitial photos any more sharper then a 720p screen? Well - that would depend upon whether the photo image is output to screen at 720p or 1080p!... I suspect.
I have to comment on this...

First off, the FCC has little to nothing to do with HDTV standards. Most HDTV content currently comes across digital cable or satellite. The vast majority of that content is 1080i - either 1920x1080, 1440x1080, or 1280x1080. Only a tiny, tiny percentage of it is upsampled. This includes network HDTV shows, they are generally broadcast at 1920x1080i and are not upsampled.

My current setup is a 720p projector on a 103" screen, which I'm very happy with, but I will definitely be going to a 1080p projector when they become affordable. If I were buying a living room HDTV (as I probably will one of these years), I'd definitely want 1080p. A couple reasons... I hate interlacing, so I don't want "i" anything, and 1080p is much more "future-proof". HD-DVD and BluRay have 1080p (1920x1080) content - it is most definitely NOT upsampled. The PS3 also outputs 1080p (the Xbox 360 is a little cagey on this, I believe it primarily does 1080i) and that will probably be my first BluRay player, maybe after the first price drop (whenever that is, and depending on how the HD-DVD/BR battle plays out..)

My biggest suggestion for someone considering a new TV purchase is at least make sure that it's one or the other HD resolution - 1280x720 or 1920x1080 - lots of "HD-ready" plasmas are 1024x768, which is not what you want at all!

Back on topic!

One option for someone who wants to hack together their own frame would be a portable DVD player. I'm especially thinking of the car-ready ones - occasionally you see those for as cheap as $99 or so, and they usually come with two 7" LCD screens, with just a wire coming off them. If you can figure out how to tap into them, you're all set. Plus they should be relatively high resolution - 720x480 or so.

No matter what you choose, if you're concerned about quality, you'll want to resize all your photos to the native resolution of the device beforehand, as the device probably doesn't do very good scaling. The easiest is to just use IrfanView and do a batch resize. If you want to fill the screen, you'll probably have to do some cropping. When loading a bunch of picture's onto my wife's PSP (which has a lovely widescreen 480x272 screen), I used IrfanView to make a custom mask in that resolution, moved and resized the selection to capture the part of the picture I wanted, then resized to the correct resolution. A little bit of extra work (especially as most photos aren't really composed to display well on a widescreen display) but the result is photos that fit the screen perfectly and are resized properly, so no "jaggies" or anything like that.
 
captaincrash said:
The HPE42USBB Black Belt series model has only 852 x 480 Resolution with no mention whether it handles 480p or 720p. The HPH42USBB model is also a BlackBet series with 1024 x 768 Resolution and again - no mention of 480p or 720p capability. These two are pictured below to the left. The 3rd model is 42EP14S with 852 x 480 Resolution and no mention whether it handles 480p or 720p. That one is pictured below to the right.
You probably know this, but in case it's not clear to anyone reading it...

The native resolution is the only thing that matters on these TVs. A 1024x768 display may "handle" 720p or 1080i displays, but all it will do will shrink the larger picture down to the 1024x768 size, losing quality in the process.

Any LCD that has an 852x480 resolution should handle 480p natively as LCDs are naturally progressive-scan. This is only slightly more horizontal resolution than a DVD and no more vertical resolution, so it would be a bit of a waste to put HD content through it.

I would also avoid 1366x768 displays, as they are not "standard" sizes and 720p will have to be upsampled and 1080i/p will have to be downsampled. Even the upsampling usually loses quality - try changing a laptop's display to a lower resolution than the native one, and you'll notice a lot of blockiness and blurriness. LCDs really need their native resolution utilitized to look right.
 
Grouch...

... great reply! It seems to me as if you KNOW something of what you're talking about (as opposed to me - I freely admit to knowing next to nothing!.... or less, depending on the topic. Of course, that does not stop me from posting a few novellas here!!!). At any rate, my complements on the reply.

So.... have you seen the laptop conversion ideas posted online? If I can get a new laptop on black friday I was considering retiring this one to the kids. And the Dell they have now could be retired to become a "digital frame" conversion project for me! Here is a link to a page with several conversion projects http://repair4laptop.org/notebook_picture_frame.html plus here is one such photo of a completed DELL conversion with what might be the actual model Dell I want to convert. I also have 3 additional Dells with varying degrees of damage (all cracked screens) which I someday was hoping to cobble together into a digital screen if I ever found a replacement screen for them for real CHEAP.

IMG_4267.JPG
IMG_4282.JPG
IMG_4271.JPG


Any thoughts on this?

AND... an off topic question? I was going to build an addition onto our home (the contractors 1st proposal was due this week but is now slated for early next week). We have an Epson 57" Rear projection and a relatively inexpensive "all in one" surround system in a box. I was going to finish part of the addition as a home theater of about 15x20 size. To varying degrees I can do what-ever I want within a down to earth budget. Well... really most of budget requires the perception of getting a deal. IE, if it costs $500 but looks like retail we won't consider it. But if it costs 10,000 and is obviously twice discontinued and 70% off then we'd snap it up.

So... my question. I was considering front projection but just went to view a Yamaha on a 103" screen at a specialty AV store. The projector was huge and cited as $12,000 and screen $4000. Gain unknown on the screen and projector seemed to have something out of convergence or adjestment. I pointed out the ghosting edge and I thought the image was clearly muddy and soft compared to my $2000 57" LCD rear projection. Frankly, the image looked horrible and - although BIG in size I was NOT compelled to budget $16,000+tax compared to my humble 57" Epson at $2000.

SO... Does front projection perform with comparable quality to the other means of display? Plasma, LCD direct view, LCD single panel projection, and Epson or Sony style 3 LCD rear projection? I could even confiscate my wife's proposed walk in closet BEHIND the far wall of the home theater if REAR projection was the way to go :rolleyes: ... but then she would probably exact a concession from me elsewhere. MAybe we don't want to go there...

Before you embark on a big reply - I understand front projection is the only way to get an image much over 70" in size. If I have a 15' wall then I could do 3' on either side for curtains and run a 9' or 108" x 60" screen. Front projectors require a dark room for proper performance. The LCD direct view screens supposedly have ghosting issues with fast motion and thus require fast response rate performance to overcome this "flaw". Single panel LCD has the spinning wheel rainbow effect - unless it is the 6 color double speed wheel. And 3 panel LCD supposedly overcomes the rainbow effect with darker blacks - but it still lacks the contrast ratio and brilliance of plasma. I seem to think Plasma is the way to go except it has a limited half life ... especially with the heavy use I would give it. Which is why I already have 2 spare bulbs for my Epson screen but am still on the 1st one. The life of the Epson bulbs is cited as longer then usual at 10,000 hours. The comparable Sony 3 LCD system - which I suspect Seiko-Epson sold Sony... has an ADJUSTIBALE outpput level with varies the expected bulb life from 6,000-10,000 hours.

So... having said that ... I am looking to use my existing 57" in the home theater while concentrating resources and spousal tolerance on first rate finishing touches like classy lounge chairs in front and sofas in back - or some other mixture, recessed & dimmable lighting, theater curtains and possibly a curvy suspended ceiling treatment. Plus double sound proofed walls with all the wiring arrayed for future or present install of a centrally mounted over head front projector and surround sound arrays.

I understand the center channel to be the most important - but... I am actually considering burying the sound sources behind recessed compartments in the wall if possible since the single frontal center speaker is considered the essential driver. So... I was going to just get by semi-temporarily with some sort of fabric frame stretched to create mask around the Epson and flanked by curtains that will eventually house the front projector. The fabric frame is my simple and cheap {?} way of bridging the gap between the decision on what to do. I figure there is about 3' of gap on either side of the 57" to the curtain edge then perhaps another 1.5' to the wall. If and when I get a 103 or 108" screen then I'd push the curtains out a little further and maybe splice in something or rebuild the mask plus move it back to be near flush with the wall - plus add the little crescent shaped illusury stage "pit" at the base of the final screen. I might add a working curtain at that time into the gap the Epson occupies in depth too... for a little drama a few times a year when I have guests over for chuckles and dinner.

So - if I was going to hide the drivers... can I use a mixture of "MY OLD DRIVERS" from my old stereo to make it fly? I have good JBL 4311 studio monitors I would mind substituting for some of the all in one surround system I already have - as I look at the things and think they're toys by comparison. AND when I look at the custom AV stuff at the high end places I muse ... this stuff is nicely finished but I want to HIDE everything - and if so why do I need this fancy stuff which is marketed to those who are looking for a way to throw away money? I am NOT looking to throw away anything if at all possible.

I think I do need a good 7.1 AV receiver.... but what is all this nonsense about power conditioners and AV componentry. AND does ANYONE really need a video processor with a miniature screen in a 15x20 home theater? I used to FILL a larger living room with just the two JBL100s I used to have and the 4311s are nearly (exactly) the same except for cosmetic finishing ... and a 85 watt intergrated amp. Could I cobble them / wire them together to create a center channel or are their unshielded woofer magnets gonna wreck my Epson? And if so - then why can't the JBLs be used if and when I get a front projection screen?

Groucho... do you have any thoughts, observations or recommendations? I know... I have a lotta questions. It's been this way all my life - especially more so AFTER I got married. It was simpler before I got married... but then again there are plenty of good things about being married too... heh-heh-hee. Seriously, I've been happily married for 13 years, and "with her" now for about 23. And it IS nice - until I want to get or do stuff that she does NOT want to get or do - and vice versa! LOL! IE... she walks out of the scary or ultra dramatic movie fare... while I tend to enjoy it. :lmao:

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or enlightenment you care to embark on posting. OR thanks to anyone else with a constructive thought or humorous retort to post!

Gotta run now...

Cheers!
 
Just a few thoughts in response, I don't want to get TOO off topic as this isn't really the proper forum for this... I don't really have any thoughts on the LCD conversion as I haven't tried nor researched this topic. I would tend to look at the car LCD screens first, as they're cheap and probably nicer/newer than the laptop ones. (Most laptop screens, especially older ones, are pretty lousy, with terrible color changes and brightness issues if you're not directly in front.) Then again, a laptop screen is bigger and will have higher resolution. So it all depends.

As for the theater... first off, you'll definitely want to head over to the AVS forum, that's one of (if not the) top place for home theater discussion. There's a few forums just for the actual construction of the theater, to say nothing of the ones regarding front projection, rear projection, speakers, etc.

The projector you saw might have been a CRT one, those are generally very large. I have a basic LCD Sanyo Z2 that I like a lot (not perfect, but very good for its class when bought) - it was $1,800 a couple years ago and the current version is similarly priced or cheaper, and you can get used ones for probably not much over a grand. As for quality - I'll put it up against darn near ANY non-front-projection display device. I much prefer the picture to what I've seen on plasmas, LCD TVs, etc. Coupled with a proper HD source, it's stunning.

The spinning color wheel you speak of affects DLP displays, not LCD ones - when I bought mine, the "rainbow" effect was a serious issue and that kept me away from the DLP projectors, though they had slightly better color. Newer DLP ones have wheels that spin faster so apparently it's not as much of an issue... things change so quickly that I'll have to start researching all over again when I do go to a 1080p projector. (They're recently gotten under $10k - they've still got a ways to go before I get one!)

The only downside to a front projection system is that you pretty much needed a dedicated, very very dark room. If you've got that, it's a no-brainer - relatively cheap and stellar quality.

For speakers, you can do whatever you want. I build a proscenium in the front of my theater - there are soffits all around the room and a stage in front, and on either side of the screen there are towers. The top half is hollow and that's where my speakers sit (currently in the open but the framework is there, and I have speaker fabric that I'm going to use to enclose them so hopefully it looks like one solid tower - the bottom half is just drywalled.)

I'm using an older Kenwood 5.1 receiver but I wired the room for 7.1 sound (actually 7.2 - I ran hookups to run dual subwoofers in the future) - might as well, while you're building it.

"Power conditioning" is pure nonsense IMHO. I am very skeptical by nature and few industries have more silly garbage for sale than the audio industry. IMHO spending money on fancy speaker wire or power conditioners or so on is a total waste. Audiophiles hate double-blind tests as they usually prove that these fancy high-end devices are just baloney - I don't think any fancy speaker wire has ever been detected in a double-blind test. I bought more or less generic (but high gauge) speaker wire from Parts Express and it's great. I did pay a lot of money for a high-end Better Cables HDMI video cable but I felt dirty doing it :) but there's a lot more going on in one of those than a speaker wire.

For video processing, I use an HTPC - home theater PC, a dedicated computer hooked to the projector. A PC can do better video quality than almost any standalone DVD player and software scalers (like DScaler) can comfortably compete with high-dollar commercial ones. The downside is that you need a LOT of power (3+ gHz equivalent) to process HD content. You won't want to watch regular TV content on a big screen, anyway - it's just not good enough. Anamorphic DVDs are very good, HD is stunning, standard-definition TV is junk.

One last thing - don't fall into the trap of making a screen too big. Mine was originally an 8ft wide 4x3 pull-down, I built a frame, cut the screen down, and it's now about 8ft wide and 45" tall (if I remember right - something like that), which is wider than a normal 16:9 screen, but lets me zoom in 2.35:1 movies even larger)... anyway, from the front row of seats (gotta have stadium seating!), the screen might actually be too large - occasionally I'll zoom the picture out slightly. There are plenty of formulas out there for measuring proper distances - I think for viewing, you want to be back 1.5x the width of the screen - so for an 8ft wide screen, you'd want to sit at least 12' back.
 





New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top