I think if Walt was still around it would be a tottally different place. I don't think Disneyworld as we know it would be anything similar to what it is today. I think Walt would have built the MK but stopped with theme parks after that. He seemed to always want new challenges. I think Epcot would have been very close to what Walt envisioned it to be and I don't think we would have MGM or AK. I think its fate that Walt was taken from us at that pivotal moment and that the project was left to others who would eventually turn it into what it is today.
What a totally interesting viewpoint. I have to agree with you on many points. I'm not sure about the "fate" thing but I do agree that it probably wouldn't be what we see today. From what I have read about Walt Disney, he tended to lose interest in things and move on to new challenges. I believe he did intend to have a copy, to some degree, of
Disneyland in Florida but that was only to give tourist a reason to go and the planned community of EPCOT a place to work and earn a living. I don't think that he was thinking at all about theme parks.
In a way, the timing of his death, was probably a good thing for Walt himself. I know, I know that sounds a bit strange but from what I have seen or read about the EPCOT plan it really was, in reality, doomed to failure. It required a too perfect blend of personality's, goals and totalitarian leadership. It would have been novel for a brief period of time but then the newness would wear off and you would have what happened to Celebration, Fl. A potentially good idea that just couldn't work in our free society.
If he had maintained interest in theme parks, I really am not sure what would have resulted. Walt was an advocate of change. If something got stale he would want to change it. That isn't something that settles well with Disney purist but that is the way he was. Always changing always improving, never standing still. He did insist on perfection so that might be a bit different when the cleanliness factor was looked at or the state of repair.
When he could call the shots 100% he surely did and didn't back down to often when outside pressure was applied. But back down he did, a number of times, in order to secure financing for his many projects. He wouldn't compromise quality but he did need to occasionally compromise content in order to keep backers happy. That is why the Florida project meant so much to him... by that time he had accumulated enough wealth to be in complete control or so he thought. Due to the fact that corporate sponsorship was required to make this dream a reality he undoubtedly would have had to compromise something along the way.
Sorry for my verbal diarrhea, I do go on sometimes.
