I am sorry, I don't have the link but the article was in today's Hartford Courant. A 60 year old history teacher was fired because a student in his class room pricked her finger on a needle and syringe that was found on the floor in his class room. The teacher is a diabetic and apparently has been improperly discarding his syringes in the waste basket instead of the nurse's office in an appropriate container. After the finger stick, the teacher submitted to blood testing but delayed reporting the results. Unfortunately he is positive for Hepatitis C. There is no information available as to the Hepatitis C status for the student.
My first thought was he should absolutely be fired. At 60 years old after years of teaching, one should know how to dispose of their needles. Secondly, he was certainly aware that he had Hep. C. The shocker in the article came when I learned this incident occurred in May of 2003! He has been on paid leave since then. I think that this decision could have and should have been made in far less than a year and not at such an expense to the tax payer. Anyone else agree?
My first thought was he should absolutely be fired. At 60 years old after years of teaching, one should know how to dispose of their needles. Secondly, he was certainly aware that he had Hep. C. The shocker in the article came when I learned this incident occurred in May of 2003! He has been on paid leave since then. I think that this decision could have and should have been made in far less than a year and not at such an expense to the tax payer. Anyone else agree?