Maleficent13
<font color=blue>Heh Heh, you're all gonna die<br>
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2003
- Messages
- 9,227
Okay, the thread title doesn't really explain what I mean, but I couldn't think of a better way to state it. Here's my example:
Today at lunch, I went to a local pub/restaurant (it was Wednesday...all chicken sandwiches $3.99!). As I was eating, a family of 6 walked in, 5 adults and 1 child, (boy, about 8).
The waitress came to get their drink orders and all the adults ordered soda, and the boy wanted Sprite. Mom told boy, "No, Sprite isn't a nutritious drink." She then asked the waitress what they had in the way of nutritious drinks, and the kid ended up with milk.
Then came the perusal of the menu. Boy had child's menu, and mom eliminated all the choices on it systematically: "No, you had pizza last week." "No, you had red meat yesterday." etc. Eventually, she agreed to let the boy get pasta with red sauce because it was the most "healthy" thing on there.
Meanwhile, the other adults at the table proceeded to order: wings, burgers, onion rings, pierogies, etc. There was not a thing on that table not fried in grease and distinctly "unhealthy". The topper was mom herself, who ordered a HUGE order of chili cheese fries, fully loaded. They pigged out, while the kid sat there and dejectedly ate his pasta. The adults kept exclaiming how good everything was, and he just watched and listened.
Now here's the debate: was this right on the parent's part? I am not debating if it was their right to make him eat "healthy": of course it was. As parents they have the say over what he does. But I am saying to me it seemed VERY hypocritical, not to mention cruel to the kid. It just felt wrong to me. The kid was very well-behaved and did not whine or ask for anything he was told he couldn't have.
Opinions?
Today at lunch, I went to a local pub/restaurant (it was Wednesday...all chicken sandwiches $3.99!). As I was eating, a family of 6 walked in, 5 adults and 1 child, (boy, about 8).
The waitress came to get their drink orders and all the adults ordered soda, and the boy wanted Sprite. Mom told boy, "No, Sprite isn't a nutritious drink." She then asked the waitress what they had in the way of nutritious drinks, and the kid ended up with milk.
Then came the perusal of the menu. Boy had child's menu, and mom eliminated all the choices on it systematically: "No, you had pizza last week." "No, you had red meat yesterday." etc. Eventually, she agreed to let the boy get pasta with red sauce because it was the most "healthy" thing on there.
Meanwhile, the other adults at the table proceeded to order: wings, burgers, onion rings, pierogies, etc. There was not a thing on that table not fried in grease and distinctly "unhealthy". The topper was mom herself, who ordered a HUGE order of chili cheese fries, fully loaded. They pigged out, while the kid sat there and dejectedly ate his pasta. The adults kept exclaiming how good everything was, and he just watched and listened.
Now here's the debate: was this right on the parent's part? I am not debating if it was their right to make him eat "healthy": of course it was. As parents they have the say over what he does. But I am saying to me it seemed VERY hypocritical, not to mention cruel to the kid. It just felt wrong to me. The kid was very well-behaved and did not whine or ask for anything he was told he couldn't have.
Opinions?