Personally, I think the problem is more fundamental than that. Many voters are ignorant or lazy and believe everything they see on media (whether it be social or broadcast). I have long used places like project vote smart or others to see how my beliefs/priorities line up with candidates and then base my vote on that. Too many people will vote party lines without a clue or because their parents or friends do/did. I count myself fortunate, because my parents did not agree and I heard both sides.
To be honest, I think each registered voter, to be able to actually vote, should have to go through some type of training/education/site like project vote smart to get a frigging clue.
With that said, I think most politicians (both sides) are liars & thieves and it was never supposed to be a career!!!! You were elected by your peers, SERVED your peers (why it's called public service) and then went back to your life.
And remove their elected politician retirement plans, private government health clubs, insurance, etc? Good luck.
In doing social work, I said the same thing about parents. You need a license to drive a car but not raise children. Wasn't our first voting also based on owning property?
Hmmm... feels like you think I was mocking you or calling you out. I don’t know your rules or legalities surrounding your voting process. I wasn’t asking about your position on the mail in ballots because I’m smug, it’s because I’m ignorant and genuinely wanted your opinion. Sorry if it came across as arrogant or inflammatory. Will refrain in future.
I read it that way. I'm not sure how many more ways I can say that people shouldn't be disenfranchised. In my personal experience in KY, we have always had voter ID laws, to discourage fraud. Again, my point was that there was plenty of time to create a system that didn't result in court appeals, causing even more division.
Definitely a problem with a two party system. On the other hand a multiple party system like Canada’s means you generally get a party elected to govern with only 30-something % of the total national vote (I think that’s about what our current government got in the last election, too lazy to google). Which means two-thirds of the country did not want that party in power and wanted someone else.
I guess neither system is without flaws.
I hadn't considered that option, but it would be a possibility. Is it effective? Maybe if our government stopped doing anything, things would get better on their own.
I guess most people want the same thing out of their government - to be protected from harm (war, fire, crime), to have freedom to do what they want as long as it doesn't infringe on the freedoms of others, and the opportunity to make things better for themselves. It's in the details where people disagree, and sadly, compromise has become an evil premise.
Agreed, but I've got no idea how to break it up.
Under the current structure smaller parties just can't compete in any realistic way and voting for them generally accomplishes somewhere between nothing and a negative result.
No solution here, other than making me King for life.
I like Doc's idea to return to part time legislatures. But, that didn't work out well here in KY as we have a part time legislature, and the Governor has solely issued executive orders during COVID, including send the state police to churches to stop people. That one already resulted in Constitutional violation judgment and he had to cease that practice.