Oh absolutely, they should hold strong on the “might have” issues crowd, barring certain circumstances. They clearly want to stop the issues that Old
DAS caused (mostly, everyone and their mother getting DAS access vs another, possibly better accommodation and incidentally, cutting down on LL and therefore SB line times). I think a second conversation could be good either way just thinking for feedback, because that can inform the DAS service (the team, not the DAS offering as a whole) and help them maybe offer something different later down the line.
Ideally it would allow for the Guest being heard (“We tried the accommodations and they caused or exasterbated this and this, and it wasn’t feasible for us”) and for the CMs to get feedback or maybe switch them to DAS or an accommodation that fits better. Cases specifically where I’m thinking about that include stuff like maybe knowing that you’re not going to be able to stand an hour long line, or issues where guests absolutely
know that they will be impacted, versus a “might happen, might not” disability that could be covered by already mentioned accommodations. Then, if DAS is given or not, at least guests
felt heard and got a second chance to state their case this time with evidence of the accommodations offered working or not working. If it turns out that the accommodations are not working as expected (somewhat unlikely, the feedback I’ve heard so far seems mostly positive barring a few hiccups) then Disney can make changes if they deem it truly needed. Either way, the cycle only works if Disney is getting feedback, so the more they get the better. They aren’t going to change or refine things unless they know it needs changing or refining.