The language in the leases for all Operating Participants is very strict. It gives Disney a lot more leverage than your "average" landlord. For example, Disney requires all OPs to enroll their employees in a "light" Traditions course. While this is true for all of their OP agreements (from the tiny Boardwalk-To-Go stand to Yak & Yeti to massive AMC Theaters cineplex), the language is even stricter for in-park OPs. There's stricter language about operating hours, theming design, and operational considerations (mostly for backstage/supply areas) than for a Disney Spring tenant. My understanding (and I *could* be wrong) is that, within those operational considerations for any OP, Disney does have the right to order the tenant to reduce building capacity for a whole slew of reasons (not just safety). This applies for both DS and in-park OPs. Up to this point, however, Disney has not chosen to exercise any of that leverage. Given that the language is stricter for in-park OPs, it's possible (and I think likely) that they may put more pressure on those OPs to match Disney's practices (there's a lot of language in the in-park OP agreement about consistency, usually around theme, "Disney look," etc... but could also be applied to health and safety protocols).