For what it’s worth, with all the talk of MK and the MK Resorts being open, I ran some numbers.
If we keep things within the monorail loop (even though the monorail would supposedly not operate in a “secure circuit” scenario), we’re talking about about 2,104 rooms in circulation. If you include the DVC units, they have 2,969 rooms in circulation. Now, let’s expand that out to WL since MK resorts would be supposedly operating with boat transportation. Excluding DVC from all four resorts, that’s a total of 2,833 rooms in circulation. With DVC units, including BRV and CCV, that’s 4,064 rooms in circulation. Given that FW seems ideal for social distancing, let’s throw the campgrounds and cabins in there. That’s a total of 5,273 “rooms” in circulation (I’m counting every campsite and cabin as its own separate “room”). To put that in perspective, that’s just under the total amount of rooms between all three All Star Resorts.
Now, WDW generally maintains an average room occupancy of 3.1 guests per room. Since that number is generally dragged down by a number of the smaller rooms at the Values and Mods that can only accommodate 4 or 3 guests, let’s up that to an average of 4 guests per room, especially given the weight DVC units (some of which acocomdoating up to 12 guests) would potentially add. If every resort was 100% full, here’s how many resort guests would have access (we assume guaranteed access) to MK. Again, in this scenario, we’re assuming MK is the only park operating initially.
100% Occupancy Scenario:
A) GF, PV, and CR - 8,416 guests
B) GF, PV, and CR plus DVC - 11,876 guests
C) GF, PV, CR, and WL - 11,332 guests
D) GF, PV, CR, and WL plus DVC - 16,256 guests
E) GF, PV, CR, WL, and FW plus DVC - 21,092 guests
Of course, given social distancing guidelines, it’s extremely unlikely Disney would allow resorts to operate at 100% occupancy even if they could fill every room. To provide for space in resort restaurants, shops, lounges, and at the Front Desk, they probably would operate with no more than 75% occupancy. Here are some other scenarios and what those numbers look like.
75% Occupancy Scenario:
A) GF, PV, and CR - 6,312 guests
B) GF, PV, and CR plus DVC - 8,907 guests
C) GF, PV, CR, and WL - 8,499 guests
D) GF, PV, CR, and WL plus DVC - 12,192 guests
E) GF, PV, CR, WL, and FW plus DVC - 15,819 guests
50% Occupancy Scenario:
A) GF, PV, and CR - 4,208 guests
B) GF, PV, and CR plus DVC - 5,938 guests
C) GF, PV, CR, and WL - 5,666 guests
D) GF, PV, CR, and WL plus DVC - 8,128 guests
E) GF, PV, CR, WL, and FW plus DVC - 10,546 guests
25% Occupancy Scenario:
A) GF, PV, and CR - 2,104 guests
B) GF, PV, and CR plus DVC - 2,969 guests
C) GF, PV, CR, and WL - 2,833 guests
D) GF, PV, CR, and WL plus DVC - 4,064 guests
E) GF, PV, CR, WL, and FW plus DVC - 5,273 guests
Of course, it wouldn’t make financial sense to operate the WDW Resorts at 25% occupancy or less for multiple nights (they’d be spending way more money than they’d be making, unless they raised the prices tremendously and forced any existing reservations to be charged at the new rate, which they wouldn’t do). So that leaves the 75 and 50 Scenarios.
Touring Plans did a calculation to see how many guests would fit into MK if each needed about 6 square feet for social distancing (Len Testa explains this in a recent edition of the Disney Dish), and they estimated that Disney would have to limit MK to about 15,000 guests for those social distancing protocols to be strictly enacted. Let’s assume they’re correct and that Disney caps MK at 15,000 guests. That assumedly eliminates Scenario 75E.
If they only opened the park to Resort Guests, that would leave Scenarios 75A, 75B, 75C, 75D, 50A, 50B, 50C, 50D, and 50E. That would put the number of guests onsite anywhere from 4,208 to 12,192 guests. Disney still wants as many people on property as they can safely have, so I’d guess 75D and 50E would be the most optimal scenarios for them. Both scenarios would give them some wiggle room to potentially bring non-Resort guests into the park, though if they were determined to keep MK resort-guests-only, they’d probably go with something closest to 75D.
If they were to open up a park reservation system (similar to the one DLR uses for its FlexPass passholders) for APs or FL Residents, then I could see them going with something closer to 50E at some point, given that scenario would give them just under 5,000 “reservations” to distribute each day. My guess is they start with one baseline and slowly start tinkering and expanding it.
I want to emphasize though that these numbers are not predictions or meant to reflect precisely what Disney will do. There’s a lot of assumptions and loose math involved here to simplify things. Disney could operate different combinations of these resorts or could operate at another level of occupancy than the ones listed here. Heck, they could operate each hotel at different occupancies. And who knows what they’ll do with existing reservations or DVC for that matter. I’m sure they want to get at least a few DVC wings open to do anything to alleviate the pending inventory problems. It could be a situation where they have the DVC resorts operate at 100% capacity in exchange for only operating the cash-side of the resorts at 50 or 60%. It could also be that they just decide to pause on DVC resorts for a bit longer for staffing reasons. Nobody knows. The purpose of this math is just to give a ballpark of the kind of numbers we can expect in terms of how many guests the WDW resorts rumored to open first could accommodate and what that might look like. These are just my opinions, so take it with a grain of salt.