LuvOrlando
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 21,196
OK, so mistakes happen. I get that, but what are they going to do about it? You can't have people with criminal records going around as officials with access to people's private info, access to people's homes which may have kids in them. I don't care about refining manuals, I think all these people need to be called back and re-screened. We have the time so there is no reason to not correct this blunder especially when the most vulnerable people in our population are the ones these workers are sent out to contact.
Criminals may have been hired for census
By Eric Zimmermann - 10/08/09 12:12 PM ET
Errors by Census Bureau employees may have resulted in 200 people with criminal records being hired to conduct door-to-door canvassing.
The Census Bureau typically takes fingerprints and performs background checks on workers hired to interact with the public. But a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that tens of thousands of workers were improperly fingerprinted by bureau employees.
The GAO fears that the name-checks performed on those employees were not sufficient without fingerprints.
"It is possible that more than 200 people with unclassifiable prints had disqualifying criminal records but still worked and had contact with the public during address canvassing," Robert Goldenkoff of the GAO said in a report to a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday.
Goldenkoff cited the "adequacy of the bureau's training" as a reason for the improper fingerprints.
He said the bureau "will refine instruction manuals and provide remediation training on proper procedures" to prevent the problem from recurring.
Criminals may have been hired for census
By Eric Zimmermann - 10/08/09 12:12 PM ET
Errors by Census Bureau employees may have resulted in 200 people with criminal records being hired to conduct door-to-door canvassing.
The Census Bureau typically takes fingerprints and performs background checks on workers hired to interact with the public. But a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that tens of thousands of workers were improperly fingerprinted by bureau employees.
The GAO fears that the name-checks performed on those employees were not sufficient without fingerprints.
"It is possible that more than 200 people with unclassifiable prints had disqualifying criminal records but still worked and had contact with the public during address canvassing," Robert Goldenkoff of the GAO said in a report to a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday.
Goldenkoff cited the "adequacy of the bureau's training" as a reason for the improper fingerprints.
He said the bureau "will refine instruction manuals and provide remediation training on proper procedures" to prevent the problem from recurring.