Dfan79
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Messages
- 1,178
No, not everybody. I side with Dfan79 on this one. It was not good.
Thank you so much, I was starting to think I was in some bizarro alternate world where this attraction was actually good.
No, not everybody. I side with Dfan79 on this one. It was not good.
Wait a minute -- wasn't "Fuzzy" the victim -- ummh, test subject -- in the ExtraTerrorestial Alien Encounter pre-show?
My favorites were George Wendt in the stomach and those 2 guys from SNL doing Schwarzeneger accents - "We pump you up!"I liked it, thought it was funny and entertaining, Ernest (Jim Varney) always worth watching for me but been so long hard to remember, I would have loved a reboot.
That’s a different timeframe though. So it must be a separate incident. The “unauthorized removal” of Buzzy is a very different thing. Perhaps the clothes being stolen were why somebody made a move after all these years.According to this the full Buzzy AA was not stolen
https://twitter.com/johngregoryx/status/1078382238289588225?s=21
If that is the case then where is the incident report for the figure? This of course is still a fluid story.That’s a different timeframe though. So it must be a separate incident. The “unauthorized removal” of Buzzy is a very different thing. Perhaps the clothes being stolen were why somebody made a move after all these years.
“Unauthorized removal” doesn’t necessarily mean stolen externally. That’s the term I’ve heard from a few places first from Martin. And again Martin has suggested that the clothes being stolen aren’t the full story, but again still no concrete evidence about this whole thing. It’s all still a guessing game.If that is the case then where is the incident report for the figure? This of course is still a fluid story.
Yeah I agree. Interested to see if any more info comes from this.“Unauthorized removal” doesn’t necessarily mean stolen externally. That’s the term I’ve heard from a few places first from Martin. And again Martin has suggested that the clothes being stolen aren’t the full story, but again still no concrete evidence about this whole thing. It’s all still a guessing game.
If that is the case then where is the incident report for the figure? This of course is still a fluid story.
The police report just says the clothes were stolen in August. The animatronic was removed after that. It’s still unclear who or what removed it and exactly when.So now that these police reports have been released, the sites, bloggers, vloggers, etc. claiming that the full animatronic WAS stolen are basically claiming their unnamed sources are right and a police report is wrong?
Or is that Buzzy's clothes got stolen, Disney reported it, and then STILL let security be so lax that the entire animatronic was then stolen in a separate incident? How is that plausible?
Or that the Orange County Sheriff is ignoring public records requests because it relates to Disney?