hnthomps
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2015
- Messages
- 397
Your point about young people and risk tolerance is a great one - I took my first cruise at age 23...during the SARS epidemic. I believe the fare for two of us was $500 for a 4 night Caribbean cruise on NCL.at what price people people will decide to risk exposure is a whole other discussion.
I do not think allowing cruise ships to go into only US ports will solve any problems (which is what I was reacting to.) First of all, if you are trying to contain a virus in CA, having a ship bringing people from port to port to port all up the coast seems completely moronic.
Secondly someone who has a level of paranoia making them afraid to leave the US is not going to get on a cruise ship under the current circumstances - it's not paranoia about the same thing but someone who is afraid to leave the country already has a high level of irrational fear, they are not going to be the ones who are going to say "oh well let's give it a try and hope for the best."
Agree that there will be some stellar bargains for people who have a higher tolerance to risk - especially people in their 20's and 30's who don't live with older people - who may not be able to afford a cruise and are at the lowest risk for transmission of the virus and also have far less of a sense of mortality than people in middle age or older.
But I don't think suspending the closed loop rules and just sailing around the US is going to make a cruise any more appealing to anyone under the current circumstances and in fact it may hasten transmission of the virus here in the US which is not something the government is going to be inclined to do.
It wasn’t crowded and there were signs everywhere about infection risk. Didn’t bother us at all!!