I don't think it is a statement that is wildly controversial. If you separated the age groups in decades, would you not agree that 100-110 would be least represented on any given day/week/month at disney? I would imagine that would be followed by the 90-99, 80-89, 70-79; after that who knows but the curve of likelihood to attend must be going downward with age.
That was the only point I was making. If you want to assume you will be going when you are 90 to divide the cost of a contract by more years then you can.This is totally anecdotal so it isn't based on anything other than my observation; if you wish to discard the premise because of that you can.
It is possible I am going at times when the 80 and 90 year olds just don't travel, but in general I don't think that assumption that I am much less likely to go in my 80's and 90's is an inaccurate one to make. I am more likely to be sick, dead, uninterested in disney, tired etc. etc. I am already feeling that way and I am not that "old" lol. Thus, in analyzing a contract with length going into years above 70, I am not placing a lot of value on those years, and rather am thinking it is more likely I will be selling when I am 75 than still going after having gone 40+ times in 40 years.
I am not saying that as a 70 or 80 year old you won't, or can't, or shouldn't go. Nor does it mean there are no 90 year olds at Disney.