So...three years ago when George Kalogridis had led
Disneyland Resort as president for three years and was just giving up the reins to Michael Colglazier in order to become president at WDW, my partner and I loved the show maintenance (except for the maintenance deferred due to the Cal/OSHA fines.) We remarked on it a lot. And when we visited WDW in 2013, we could not get over how bad maintenance and show were in the Florida parks (as in, orange traffic cones blocking off broken ride vehicles on the People Mover), and how unhappy Florida CMs seemed to be, both as compared to Disneyland. But Kalogridis has presided over WDW for the past three years. Last month we visited WDW and in terms of good show and friendly CMs, it felt like Disneyland used to feel to us three years ago--and much, much improved from the vibe we got at WDW in 2013. When Colglazier arrived at Disneyland in 2013, some bloggers wondered if he would have as positive an effect on the parks as Kalogridis had, or if he would just be a bean counter who would subsume show to budgetary concerns. My take after visiting WDW this year is that it really does come down to management. Disneyland had a good thing in Kalogridis, and now WDW has a good thing in him too. Colglazier, meanwhile, is pretty much Pressler/Harris, the second coming, with no sense of the importance of show. This was instrumental in our decision last month to purchase WDW APs instead of DLR ones.