Belle0101
Nothing to see here.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2002
- Messages
- 4,911
I would guess that each state is different but generally speaking if you draw unemployment and have a wage garnishment against you are you obligated to disclose the garnishment?
And now for the vent - my ex has had a granishment against him since 2002. At that time there was also order put in that he is to inform the prosecutor regarding all wage and employment changes.
Of course he has never, and I repeat NEVER, told an employer about the garnishment or notified the prosecutor regarding changes.
2005 comes along and along with other issues, my attorney points this out. He is then ordered to also notify my attorney within 48 hours of all wage and employment changes.
I bet you see where I'm going don't you?
He has never told his employers (he likes to get a job, finds it's too hard and then quits) about the garnishment nor has he notified the proper court officers.
On the one rare chance I found out that he was employed, 2007, I called my attorney and asked them to call the employer to inform them of the garnishment.
Yeah, sorry can't be done. I had to pay my attorney to go back into court to have the garnishment order sent to his employer via the court system.
All of the sudden now, no child support. I found out via his employer that he is laid off.
Guess where I'm going with this?
The last time he was on unemployment he quit paying support, hired a lawyer, took me to court, asked to have support lowered because he was on unemployment. To which the judge asked, "Is your attorney charging you? Couldn't you have used that money to pay support?"
Which leads back to my question - is he obligated to let the unemployment people know there is a wage garnishment for support? Or am I just plain out of luck?
And now for the vent - my ex has had a granishment against him since 2002. At that time there was also order put in that he is to inform the prosecutor regarding all wage and employment changes.
Of course he has never, and I repeat NEVER, told an employer about the garnishment or notified the prosecutor regarding changes.
2005 comes along and along with other issues, my attorney points this out. He is then ordered to also notify my attorney within 48 hours of all wage and employment changes.
I bet you see where I'm going don't you?
He has never told his employers (he likes to get a job, finds it's too hard and then quits) about the garnishment nor has he notified the proper court officers.
On the one rare chance I found out that he was employed, 2007, I called my attorney and asked them to call the employer to inform them of the garnishment.
Yeah, sorry can't be done. I had to pay my attorney to go back into court to have the garnishment order sent to his employer via the court system.

All of the sudden now, no child support. I found out via his employer that he is laid off.
Guess where I'm going with this?
The last time he was on unemployment he quit paying support, hired a lawyer, took me to court, asked to have support lowered because he was on unemployment. To which the judge asked, "Is your attorney charging you? Couldn't you have used that money to pay support?"
Which leads back to my question - is he obligated to let the unemployment people know there is a wage garnishment for support? Or am I just plain out of luck?