Obviously, you would change the last name, but what about the first name? We just finished our classes to adopt through DCFS, and we are hoping to adopt a toddler age child. My opinion is that the child should get the benefit of a fresh start, and that includes his/her name. I hate to sound harsh, but I feel like why should a child be saddled with a name his/her whole life that was given to them by someone who abused/neglected them to the point of them being taken away by the state? Does anybody have any experience with changing a child's name after adopting?
One of my thoughts is why does a toddler need a fresh start?
Who is the fresh start for, you or the child?
OP, foster children aren't always abused or neglected. Sometimes the parent is very loving but unable to care for them. I have adopted 2 children from the foster system and retained the names the birth family gave them. The names are an integral part of my kids. They came to us with a specific personality, certain looks and a special name. I could have changed the name easily and it never would have bothered them since they are unable to comprehend such things. I didn't because I feel it would be like coloring their hair to a shade I preferred. It would change them. Whatever you do, God bless you.
I agree with alizemom.
I am looking at this from 3 perspectives.
In one of my first Nursing jobs, I worked as an RN in an inpatient Mental Health facility for children and adolescents. Some of the children in our care had been abused and neglected - some horribly so. Despite that, the children continued to love their parents (somewhat like an abused woman who continues to stay with her/his spouse/SO). It didn't make sense, given how they were treated, but the love was there, along with the feeling that they were the cause of the abuse ("I wasn't loveable enough".) That is a common feeling in children who have been abused/neglected.
Several of the children had been through adoption at a young age and as teens had adjustment issues with their adoptive parents. One girl in particular had very low self esteem, even though her adoptive parents were some of the nicest people I had ever met, who loved their daughter very much. BUT, she knew that they had changed her name (their reason was 'to give her a new start" like the OP's idea) and she took that to mean that nothing about her was good. She also knew that her adoptive parents thought her birth parents were bad people EVEN THOUGH THE PARENTS WERE CAREFUL NOT TO EVER SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT HER BIRTH PARENTS. As she said, "What is the child of monsters? A monster." Where had she gotten that idea? From the adoptive parents who had never said anything, but showed her those opinions in a lot of tiny, non-verbal ways. They had no clue that they were 'telling' her those things.
I'm not saying this is how it always is, just that there is a danger.
My second perspective is when I worked in Public Health as a nurse who actually did home visits to families who were abusing and/or neglecting their children. Some of the parents, like alizemom pointed out, were very loving and just were unable to care for the child.
Even the families who were horribly abusing and neglecting their child loved that child on some level. Many of the parents did not
know how to parent; some because they were very young and unprepared to take care of a child, because they had not been parented by their own parent, from mental illness, drugs and alcohol or being the overwhelmed parent who was just in way over their head. Some had very skewed ideas/misconceptions about children - I can't even count the number of times I was told "my baby cries because he doesn't love me" - about a child under the age of one. Or parents who thought their toddler or infant soiled his diaper just to 'spite' them.
Some knew they were not good parents and voluntarily gave up parental rights
because they loved their child and knew they were not the parents that child deserved - those kids were some of the lucky ones who ended up in foster care and later, adoption. Some ended up getting their rights terminated due to abuse/neglect and the fact that they could not/would not change enough to care for the child. For some, their child being taken away was a wake up call, which they used to make changes in their life and the child was returned home.
No matter what happened to get the child to the point of adoption, their birth parents are part of who they are. The child becomes part of the adoptive family, but the birth family is still part of their history and part of them.
My third perspective is as a woman who went thru all the steps of an adoption study with my DH. We were awaiting placement when I actually got pregnant, so we never did go thru an adoption. But, we had gone thru all the 'hoops' and were on a list for placement.
DH and I did discuss some of the issues around names. We decided that it it was not fair to rename a child and take that part of a child away.
Like alizesmom mentioned, we looked at it like changing the child's hair color to something that we preferred. Naming a child
is a parent's right, but if the child already had a name, we did not see it as our right to change it. We had investigated foreign adoption and had decided that if the child had a name that was not able to be pronounced in English, we would probably keep the child's name and middle name as middle names and use an 'easier' name as a first name (with the child having input if old enough).
We also thought of what we would do if a child had a birth name that really did not go with our name or if we had a problem with the name (like first name of the guy who bullied people in my middle school).
Whatever you decide to do, good luck in your journey.