bellacam said:
I thought it was all fishy too, till I saw this picture.
No woman would go thru the hell of nursing bras just for a photo op. So unless she's lactating for Tom, there's a baby somewhere. I do wonder why there have been no pics though.
There is the "Please don't make me kiss Uncle Joe" face again!
As for the exposed nursing bra, it proves to me that this was staged. I have never seen a nursing bra exposed like that. This has, "look at me world, I have a nursing bra on, so I must have a new baby" written all over it. Not to mention the "my God, I can't believe they are making me hold his hand" Look.
Now, let's talk about the baby. Or lack there of. We all klnow that the paparazzi will do WHATEVER IT TAKES to get a picture of something worth money. Can I say, Little Miss Jolie-Pitt glamour shots brought in a cozy 4 MIL. I am going to guess that a picture of the corner of the blanket Tomkitten is wrapped in would bring in triple that. Sooooo, believe you me, even if the baby were holed up in the house, never to see the light of day, for fear of a picture being snapped, we would get a picture of a figure in a window holding something that looks like a baby. Could be a freaking watermelon, but if a photgrapher can sell it as a baby, he would. We have NOTHING.
You would at least think they would do what Rosie O'Donnell did when she first adopted Parker. She knew the press wanted pictures, and she had decided she was going to keep her kids out of the public eye. so she set up a photo shoot, and it was her, and a doll. The photographer set it up to look like she was cuddling a swaddled baby, and it worked. The pictures look like she was holding a baby, only we couldn't see the baby wasn't real. The pictures sold, the public was happy.