I'd imagine he has spoken to an attorney who is now giving him direction to not speak. It's not the popular thing to do, but he really has nothing to gain by speaking to authorities until he is ordered to. His falling off the grid I am positive is because of legal advice.
Exactly and -- while this does
not mean I am supporting or defending him -- I am surprised that many here don't seem to understand that (a) he has every legal right to do
everything possible to not further incriminate himself and (b) is doing
precisely what most people getting good legal advice would do in similar circumstances. Unless the Feds find a way to charge him with something here without getting further testimony/evidence (which appears unlikely), the only legal threat he is facing is extradition, which Zimbabwe has said they "want" but needs to (and has not yet) filed a formal request for. And as I have explained in a separate post, extradition is a long, slow, drawn out process Palmer will have multiple opportunities to fight against.
He is not helping his case by ignoring the calls from the US Fish and Game people.
From a P.R. perspective, you are correct.
But from a legal perspective, dead wrong. What any defense lawyer would be telling him right now is that he doesn't benefit in any way from talking to the authorities.
BTW.. The dentist contacted authorities on Thursday and has agreed to cooperate with the investigation.
No, Palmer did not contact them and no one is stating there was any agreement was made to cooperate. from FOX:
"A Fish and Wildlife spokesperson issued this statement Friday afternoon: "
Late yesterday afternoon the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement was contacted by a representative of Dr. Walter Palmer. The Service's investigation is ongoing and appreciates that Dr. Palmer's representative voluntarily reached out to the Service."
Sounds like legal counsel for Palmer simply contacted Fish and Wildlife. For all we know, it was just to say "
I'm representing the Dr." Again, no statements whatsoever about "
agreeing to cooperate."
It's interesting who gets to decide what is "off topic". So far it appears that anything other than "OMG the dentist is the most horrible person and needs to pay" is the only acceptable reply on here.
Rumours stand for facts. Guilty until proven innocent. It's like the Middle Ages with Twitter.
Exactly, but unfortunately by pointing that out you have now joined those of us who are targets of the social media vigilante crowd here. They can not tolerate any dissent.