Here in Ohio, eligibility is opening up to more groups starting Thursday...including those who are 60+, pregnant women, childcare workers, etc. Surprising to me since we had so much trouble getting appointments for my in-laws who are in the 65+ group, but we are also due to get our largest shipment of vaccines coming up. I just looked on Walgreens and saw lots of availability, more on CVS.com, etc.
https://www.cleveland.com/open/2021...or-coronavirus-vaccine-starting-thursday.html
They are also not a magic shield. The right masks do help but they also have to be paired with the proper technique.
It doesn't take a genius to tell that there is still significant spread of COVID even with masking at 100%. Stop blaming it on people not masking as in most places that just isn't the case.
I think a lot of the problems with the vaccine roll out are failures of messaging. Public health infrastructure just isn't set up for good public relations or community outreach, and it shows. I think the idea of focusing on underserved populations is a good one in principle, but not if the implementation is just a restriction on who can make appointments without any awareness campaign to ensure those in the targeted zip codes know about the program and a realistic means of sign up. The latter is a big issue with the age-based implementation too. My mom's county is, fortunately, making appointments by phone as well as internet, but so many organizations are relying on social media to announce new clinics and available slots and conducting sign-ups solely or primarily online without thinking about the computer habits of the populations they're trying to reach (right now, 65+ and certain essential workers). Unless they have children or grandchildren helping them with the process, many of them are missing out because the message is being sent on a channel they just don't use.
"
All three vaccines were 100% effective at preventing severe disease six weeks after the first dose (for Moderna) or seven weeks after the first dose (for Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, the latter of which requires only one dose). Zero vaccinated people in any of the trials were hospitalized or died of COVID-19 after the vaccines had fully taken effect. "
https://www.livescience.com/covid-19-vaccine-efficacy-explained.html
Not shocking at all. We have a hundred years of evidence that viruses aren’t stopped by masks. That didn’t stop being true a year ago. Regardless of how our leaders have tried to lay the blame for a highly contagious airborne respiratory virus at our feet.
The more you know, and all that...
Additionally this was in the COVID briefing: "Even with a persistent glitch in date reporting, the state is sitting at between a 70% and 80% vaccination rate."
70-80% have gotten a vaccine already? Sounds suspect.
There are always likely to be an outlier. These trials are still a darn good snapshot of what to expect. I'm still very hopeful that they will also prevent transmission of the virus too. We are also in a much better position than when the trials were conducted. So definitely another positive. IMONot disagreeing on the benefits of a vaccine.
But, what’s the real world effect on severe diseases and hospitalizations? Again, the clinical trials were conducted at a different time of the pandemic. Showing me clinical trial data is just like someone downplaying J&J because the numbers are not up to that of the Pfizer/Moderna studies.
Two recent studies to show real world effect of Pfizer vaccine.
https://khub.net/documents/135939561/430986542/Early effectiveness of COVID vaccines.pdf/ffd7161c-b255-8e88-c2dc-88979fc2cc1b?t=1614617945615
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765?articleTools=true
70-80% have gotten a vaccine already? Sounds suspect.
They are talking about the percentage of doses administered in comparison to doses received from the Federal government. So of the doses they've received they've administered 70%-80% (depending on the week) of that.maybe 70- 80% of the eligible groups?
There are always likely to be an outlier. These trials are still a darn good snapshot of what to expect. I'm still very hopeful that they will also prevent transmission of the virus too. We are also in a much better position than when the trials were conducted. So definitely another positive. IMO
Sure!That's the whole swiss cheese concept, that masks, plus hand washing, plus social distancing, etc, can be very effective. I do think it's irresponsible to flat out say that masks don't stop viruses. They do, in fact, limit the spread of respiratory droplets that carry viruses, which for many people would significantly decrease the chance of them becoming infected. Case in point, the fitness instructors who were "pre-symptomatic" at 2 different gyms that did not require masking, which ultimately led to 55 cases out of 81 people who took classes in Chicago and 21 infections in Hawaii linked to one instructor, including 10 out of 11 participants from one class. Lots of things would have helped prevent this, including masking.
CDC Traces Covid-19 Outbreaks in Gyms, Urging Stricter Precautions - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Your surgeon doesn’t wear a mask to stop viruses. Up until April 2020 that was common knowledge. They wore them so they don’t spit into your open mouth or wounds. It’s ok you didn’t know that.So, it’s okay for a dentist or surgical team to not wear any mouth coverings? Maybe all those masks made by 3M is a hoax, playing on people’s fears. Obviously, since they don’t do much, right?
Not all masks are created equally or worn properly.
Not disagreeing on the benefits of a vaccine.
But, what’s the real world effect on severe diseases and hospitalizations? Again, the clinical trials were conducted at a different time of the pandemic. Showing me clinical trial data is just like someone downplaying J&J because the numbers are not up to that of the Pfizer/Moderna studies.
I was just coming to share his tweet!BREAKING: the White House just announced that there will be enough vaccine in the US to vaccinate every adult in the country by the end of May.