Casey Anthony Trial Thread #3

[ilovepete]

Wow bet Baez wishes he didn't ask THAT question! LOL

 

[Samba]

Just saw a study released that whining was most irritating sound to humans. Obviously they did not use a string of HoseA questioning in the study!!

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

Hey! I've got a question for you guys. Can you give..........wait........um. Okay, never mind. Let me rephrase that. If I......no, no, if you were to......well, no, that wasn't phrased correctly. Um, never mind, I'll jut ask something else later.

I think the answer is two weeks...yes, two weeks. Or, a good time longer. Or dogs buried it...or coyotes. I'll get back to you.

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

Wow bet Baez wishes he didn't ask THAT question! LOL

What question? Missed it!

 

[usnuzuloose]

His own objection is overuled

 

[Samba]

Air sample testing?! Really?! Junk science.

HoseA not allowing his witness to answer, now! He's being non-responsive. Heck, I would be UNresponsive!

 

[ilovepete]

What question? Missed it!

The one about Dr. Weiss doing a quantitative analysis... he went on and on and on, not really to the defenses benefit. Just did the same with another question. Baez is clearly annoyed!

 

[LisaR]

This guy is a witness for the DEFENSE, right?

 

[ilovepete]

This guy is a witness for the DEFENSE, right?

Supposedly LOL

 

[reelmom]

So I am guessing the the defense picked witnesses that :
A: Are older and are at the end of their career so they don't care about how they come off and
B: Young people who are wanting to further careers and/or new to testifying
so that he can blame them at the end of the trial when it doesn't go his way.

I think he is incompetent and he is being a jerk to HIS witness, Marcus Weiss

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

No wonder this guy sounds so smart! He's on the prosecution's "side"; Baez just challenging (or trying to) his findings.

 

[Lisa loves Pooh]

Actually, I don't understand Burden of Proof. LOL I just know how to cut and paste. It was my understanding that the defense doesn't have to prove anything, or offer a defense or a case. So are you interpreting it to mean that since they made certain statements of proof/evidence (not quite sure how to word that), they need offer proof of it? Or am I way off? Or am I not making sense at all? lol

The way I read it--if one side sufficient proves their point, the burden shifts to the other side to disprove the point.

I am not watching, so don't know the context, but I am guessing it was directed to the defense that they now have the burden on proof on at least some points.

Anyone with a different (or correct) interpetation, please chime in!

 

[reelmom]

No wonder this guy sounds so smart! He's on the prosecution's "side"; Baez just challenging (or trying to) his findings.

Explains the condescending tone.

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

The way I read it--if one side sufficient proves their point, the burden shifts to the other side to disprove the point.

I am not watching, so don't know the context, but I am guessing it was directed to the defense that they now have the burden on proof on at least some points.

Anyone with a different (or correct) interpetation, please chime in!

Sounds good to me! I think I had some sort of vague version of that in my head. I think.

 

[ilovepete]

Ashton is LOVING this, they have the camera on him.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Jeff Ashton smirking and shaking his head.

 

[diznygirl]

If Baez asked the question of Melich dealing with Casey's arrests, one of which would have been the check thing I'm guessing, can state ask on cross "and what charges was she arrested for?"



(home from kiddie fun - internet is out in town! - thank god for smart phones - and how do you turn off the &@$@ auto correct!)

 

[Samba]

Is Ashton trying to suppress a giggle?!?

 

[sorcerormickey]

This guy is a witness for the DEFENSE, right?

Have ANY of the 'defense witnesses' actually helped the defense yet?

 

[Lisa loves Pooh]

What is Baez doing now?