After listening to commentators, I am wondering about one thing. The prosecution is still trying this case as she lied about the nanny and trying to prove that she was lying, that the nanny didn't exist.
BUT, the defense changed that. She has now admitted the nanny was a lie and came out with the abuse and George aiding and abetting story. So shouldn't the prosecution change strategy? Seems like they are still trying to prove that which the defense has already conceded that it wasn't true.
Unless, the are just using this to show how good of a liar she really is?
Did that make sense?