GoofyDad869
<font color=teal>More fun than a Barrel o' Monkeys
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2005
- Messages
- 2,541
Golfgal -
And how does Consumer Reports attract those private source fundings and subscriptions? I'm not knocking them - I have a subscription to their website.
Here's my point... Have you heard of any tire separation/rollover accidents lately? Did Ford really take care of absolutely ALL of those issues, including the factors they have absolutely no control over (like angle of incident when the vehicle goes off road, personal loading of the vehicle, tire pressures at the time of the accident, etc.)? Why was that SUCH a design flaw on merely the Ford Explorer, when the Ranger pickup and larger Expedition SUVs are built on the same chassis, or even the Mercury & Lincoln SUV models (also based very closely on the Explorer)?
Or how about those nasty gas tank flashover problems with Chevy trucks (a la the NBC news show exploitation where they were caught installing explosive squibs to 'help' make their point)? I don't trust much of what I hear, watch or read from any media source. I do trust Consumer Reports' OBJECTIVE criticisms - just not the wide-ranging, subjective and representative statements. And I don't trust ONLY "Consumer Reports" - I'll back it up with some others (I subscribe to "Car & Driver" & "AutoWeek" and I also pick up most issues of "Road & Track" & "Motor Trend"), and Edmund's website, and Vehix, etc. on a vehicle-buying decision.
How about the fact that Nissan recalled ALL early model 350Zs for front tire wear / toe-in issues? Somehow, that one never made national press coverage. It meant big-bucks repairs to the suspension for each and every car, plus replacement of tires for an entire couple years' model line.
No manufacturer is perfect. Some are better than others, but SOME are getting a bad rap. And some are just better at covering up their imperfections (I'll use that word tactfully, as an 'imperfection' caused my uncle and cousin to be killed - in a Toyota - many years ago). Toyota settled out of court for that accident. Visit "www.alldata.com" and check out their automotive recalls and technical service bulletins for ANY year make/model.
We're talking about intricate machines that consist of thousands of parts - and we're beefing about one or two (or a dozen) malfunctions? In my earlier post I mentioned a few things wrong with my cars. As I look back over it, the only malfunction not relating to misuse/abuse on my part (or my daughter's part) was the driver-side electric window motor on my T/A, and arguably the Subie's sticking throttle plate. Who's to say that I didn't have my window ALL the way up last time I washed it?
If you're just trusting only what you're reading in (insert any publication here), you're not getting all of the information.
I personally recommend Subarus (which is a GM subsidiary) - is that American-made enough? My wife feels that GM cars are crap - but my GM gets me door-to-door just as well as any other car, warts and all.
I also stated that my next car (Corvette Z06) is (will be?) American-made. Chevrolet's American, right?
I've owned Fords, a Mercury, a Chevy, Pontiacs, a Subaru, a Jeep, and a couple of Oldsmobiles. I'm not an American-made-only, but I am biased toward (not against) them. I'll admit that.
Basing an important decision on '(Enter brand name here)'s have been in my family for XX years' as your sole reason doesn't really cut it for me either.
Would I personally buy a Toyota? Probably not, but I also don't try to keep a family member from considering one. My sister drives one. Cool.
As far as recommendations - I am not a professional car reviewer. I am in one of our two cars 90% of the time, with the remainder being in a rental, or another persons' car. I only know about the cars I've owned, the only other comments about any other would just be supposition and rumor.
The cars I've owned:
2001 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am - love it. minor problems.
2003 Subaru Legacy Wagon - love it. minor problems.
2001 Pontiac Grand Am - major problems. traded it for the Subie.
1997 Pontiac Montana - loved it. traded it for the T/A.
1996 Jeep Cherokee - minor problems. traded it for the Grand Am.
1995 Chevrolet Camaro - V6. loved it. minor problems. traded it for the Montana.
1993 Oldsmobile Acheiva - minor problems. traded it for the Cherokee.
1987 Oldsmobile Firenze - minor problems. traded it for the Camaro.
1984 Ford Escort - major problems. high school car. (I was the shiz, wasn't I)
1980 Ford Fiesta - minor problems. high school car.
1978 Mercury Zephyr - minor problems. high school car.
9 for 11 - good experiences. Both of those bad experiences had some form of owner abuse that lead to the problem. Of the ones with minor problems, the vast majority have been abuse / neglect problems. Am I lucky? I don't know.
And how does Consumer Reports attract those private source fundings and subscriptions? I'm not knocking them - I have a subscription to their website.
Here's my point... Have you heard of any tire separation/rollover accidents lately? Did Ford really take care of absolutely ALL of those issues, including the factors they have absolutely no control over (like angle of incident when the vehicle goes off road, personal loading of the vehicle, tire pressures at the time of the accident, etc.)? Why was that SUCH a design flaw on merely the Ford Explorer, when the Ranger pickup and larger Expedition SUVs are built on the same chassis, or even the Mercury & Lincoln SUV models (also based very closely on the Explorer)?
Or how about those nasty gas tank flashover problems with Chevy trucks (a la the NBC news show exploitation where they were caught installing explosive squibs to 'help' make their point)? I don't trust much of what I hear, watch or read from any media source. I do trust Consumer Reports' OBJECTIVE criticisms - just not the wide-ranging, subjective and representative statements. And I don't trust ONLY "Consumer Reports" - I'll back it up with some others (I subscribe to "Car & Driver" & "AutoWeek" and I also pick up most issues of "Road & Track" & "Motor Trend"), and Edmund's website, and Vehix, etc. on a vehicle-buying decision.
How about the fact that Nissan recalled ALL early model 350Zs for front tire wear / toe-in issues? Somehow, that one never made national press coverage. It meant big-bucks repairs to the suspension for each and every car, plus replacement of tires for an entire couple years' model line.
No manufacturer is perfect. Some are better than others, but SOME are getting a bad rap. And some are just better at covering up their imperfections (I'll use that word tactfully, as an 'imperfection' caused my uncle and cousin to be killed - in a Toyota - many years ago). Toyota settled out of court for that accident. Visit "www.alldata.com" and check out their automotive recalls and technical service bulletins for ANY year make/model.
We're talking about intricate machines that consist of thousands of parts - and we're beefing about one or two (or a dozen) malfunctions? In my earlier post I mentioned a few things wrong with my cars. As I look back over it, the only malfunction not relating to misuse/abuse on my part (or my daughter's part) was the driver-side electric window motor on my T/A, and arguably the Subie's sticking throttle plate. Who's to say that I didn't have my window ALL the way up last time I washed it?
If you're just trusting only what you're reading in (insert any publication here), you're not getting all of the information.
I personally recommend Subarus (which is a GM subsidiary) - is that American-made enough? My wife feels that GM cars are crap - but my GM gets me door-to-door just as well as any other car, warts and all.
I also stated that my next car (Corvette Z06) is (will be?) American-made. Chevrolet's American, right?
I've owned Fords, a Mercury, a Chevy, Pontiacs, a Subaru, a Jeep, and a couple of Oldsmobiles. I'm not an American-made-only, but I am biased toward (not against) them. I'll admit that.
Basing an important decision on '(Enter brand name here)'s have been in my family for XX years' as your sole reason doesn't really cut it for me either.
Would I personally buy a Toyota? Probably not, but I also don't try to keep a family member from considering one. My sister drives one. Cool.
As far as recommendations - I am not a professional car reviewer. I am in one of our two cars 90% of the time, with the remainder being in a rental, or another persons' car. I only know about the cars I've owned, the only other comments about any other would just be supposition and rumor.
The cars I've owned:
2001 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am - love it. minor problems.
2003 Subaru Legacy Wagon - love it. minor problems.
2001 Pontiac Grand Am - major problems. traded it for the Subie.
1997 Pontiac Montana - loved it. traded it for the T/A.
1996 Jeep Cherokee - minor problems. traded it for the Grand Am.
1995 Chevrolet Camaro - V6. loved it. minor problems. traded it for the Montana.
1993 Oldsmobile Acheiva - minor problems. traded it for the Cherokee.
1987 Oldsmobile Firenze - minor problems. traded it for the Camaro.
1984 Ford Escort - major problems. high school car. (I was the shiz, wasn't I)
1980 Ford Fiesta - minor problems. high school car.
1978 Mercury Zephyr - minor problems. high school car.
9 for 11 - good experiences. Both of those bad experiences had some form of owner abuse that lead to the problem. Of the ones with minor problems, the vast majority have been abuse / neglect problems. Am I lucky? I don't know.