poohnpiglet3
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Messages
- 362
Hi everyone! You have all been so helpful in the past by all of your posts... I've learned so much.
My DH and I are going to be joining DVC within the next few months. We have 2-year-old twins. I am 29 and DH is 32. Here's the question:
Are the extra years on the contract at SSR better, given our age/family situation, or is the proximity to Epcot/MGM better for the remaining 40 or so years of our DVC membership?
We're deciding, obviously, between buying through Disney or a resale. Here's my thinking, please point out any observations you can make with my logic. With SSR, by the time the contract is up, my children will be 52. I'll be 78, DH will be 81 (of course, presuming we are still around.) With Boardwalk, our kids will be 40 and I'll be 66, DH will be 69.
However, I think I would prefer to stay more often at BWV or BCV while the children are under 18, after that, it still would be nice to have the proximity to the parks. DTD is alot of fun, and we do enjoy going there, but we're not into the whole PI scene necessarily.
I know you all always say that you should buy where you want to stay, but I really forsee us wanting to stay at several different places, BCV, BWV, VWL and SSR. Of course we'll make a few 2-day-trips to VB occassionally. We're also going to be pairing a 4-day stay with DVC along with a 3- or 4-day Disney Cruise.
So there's my dilemma. I really like the fact that SSR has the extra years, and, depending on the age that our children have children of their own, they could always use the points as well. The extra years are so enticing, but on the surface, I can't see staying at SSR regularly (as my first choice) for about 14 years (and the kids want to explore DTD and do DisneyQuest on their own, if they're able to earn the trust at that point.)
So there are my thoughts. I know you all will have suggestions as to what to do. I'm just torn! Money really isn't the issue, I mean, if we could save a bit, that would be great, but we're not doing this to count pennies - we're doing it to make wonderful memories for our twins.
Sherri
My DH and I are going to be joining DVC within the next few months. We have 2-year-old twins. I am 29 and DH is 32. Here's the question:
Are the extra years on the contract at SSR better, given our age/family situation, or is the proximity to Epcot/MGM better for the remaining 40 or so years of our DVC membership?
We're deciding, obviously, between buying through Disney or a resale. Here's my thinking, please point out any observations you can make with my logic. With SSR, by the time the contract is up, my children will be 52. I'll be 78, DH will be 81 (of course, presuming we are still around.) With Boardwalk, our kids will be 40 and I'll be 66, DH will be 69.
However, I think I would prefer to stay more often at BWV or BCV while the children are under 18, after that, it still would be nice to have the proximity to the parks. DTD is alot of fun, and we do enjoy going there, but we're not into the whole PI scene necessarily.
I know you all always say that you should buy where you want to stay, but I really forsee us wanting to stay at several different places, BCV, BWV, VWL and SSR. Of course we'll make a few 2-day-trips to VB occassionally. We're also going to be pairing a 4-day stay with DVC along with a 3- or 4-day Disney Cruise.
So there's my dilemma. I really like the fact that SSR has the extra years, and, depending on the age that our children have children of their own, they could always use the points as well. The extra years are so enticing, but on the surface, I can't see staying at SSR regularly (as my first choice) for about 14 years (and the kids want to explore DTD and do DisneyQuest on their own, if they're able to earn the trust at that point.)
So there are my thoughts. I know you all will have suggestions as to what to do. I'm just torn! Money really isn't the issue, I mean, if we could save a bit, that would be great, but we're not doing this to count pennies - we're doing it to make wonderful memories for our twins.


Sherri
