Can An Atheist Be President.

Can an atheist be President?

  • It wouldn't matter to me. I would vote for the "man".

  • I would prefer to vote for an atheist.

  • I would only vote for someone who believed in God.

  • I would only vote someone who is in my religious denomination.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Originally posted by MinnieYC
Kendra, by any chance, have you actually read the Koran?
Whether you like it or not, there is a LOT more in common between Islam and Christianity than Abraham. For example, some of the prophets of Islam incuding Abraham, Noah, Moses, Jesus (called Isa in Arabic), and John the Baptist. There is much about Jesus' live and teachings in the Koran as well. Muslims also believe that they are waiting for Jesus' second coming.

I know some people don't like the idea that their religion is similar to Islam, but the truth is that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all connected. I don't have time to list even a smidgeon of the connections, but I recommend Houston Smith's book "The World's Religions" for more information: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=i98eheg9yO&isbn=0062508113&itm=1

Again, Muslim terrorists are extremists. Nearly every religion has had extremists at some point in its history, Christianity being absolutely no exception. Many Muslim Americans lost relatives on September 11, 2001. If you knew a few of the wonderful Americans who happen to be Muslim, perhaps you'd realize that being Muslim does not mean being a bad person.

Thank you for your reply. If Muslims were waiting for Christ's return in the Christian sense, they'd be Christians. When a moderate community has no voice and does not speak, and the "fringe" takes the lead and their acts are greeted with celebrations in the streets of Muslim countries and communities around the world, then there is no moderate community. Currently, what you have described as the fringe of Islam is actually the mainstream. The silence of American Muslims and Muslims around the world to the numerous attacks on civilian targets (EVEN TODAY!) is tacit approval by this mythical mainstream Muslim majority.

The problem we have now is that extremism is now the Islamic voice the world hears and sees. Certainly Christianity had its extreme period. The extremism that you discuss in every religion--Judaism and Christianity specifically are extraordinary events. Christianity and Judaism are not militant warfare-based religions. Koran itself, which I've read and studied, commands its adherents to kill nonbelievers and that is exactly what they are doing. There are no specific commands in the Old or New Testaments to eradicate people who do not adhere to those religions. The Koran, on the other hand, specifically commands Muslims to kill nonbelievers.

If you have any Bible quotes that command Christians or Jews to kill nonbelievers just because they are nonbelievers I invite you to post them. If you would like to see the text from the Koran that commands one to kill the nonbelievers, I will gladly post them, as I have on another thread.

Judaism and Christianity are not at all related to Islam. When fundamentalist Jews and Christians want to give glory to their God, they go to Church and Synagogue and worship. When fundamentalist Muslims want to give glory to Allah, they blow people up. The silence of the moderate Muslim community means one of two things: there is no moderate community, or 2) they fear retribution. In either case the fanatics are now the mainstream and we are in serious trouble on account of it.

For a more accurate view of Islam, why not read the Closed Circle by Steven Emerson or some of Bernard Lewis' works?
 
Kendra, I didn't say our country wasn't a "Christian Country" . .

John Adams said it in a treaty proposal to Tripoli. (1797)




"This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religions in it." -John Adams Letter to Thomas Jefferson, January 1817


Here are some more from Adams:

"The question before the human race is, whether the God of nature shall govern the world by his own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule it by fictitious miracles?"
-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 20, 1815

"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?"
-- John Adams, letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, December 27, 1816

"The frightful engines of ecclesiastical councils, of diabolical malice, and Calvinistical good-nature never failed to terrify me exceedingly whenever I thought of preaching."
-- John Adams, letter to his brother-in-law, Richard Cranch, October 18, 1756, explaining why he rejected the ministry.


"I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!"
-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, from George Seldes, The Great Quotations, also from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief



Remembering that one can have a very firm belief in God but not be religious per se.. I think it's fair to say Adams was at times religious and at times skeptical of religion, but definitely didn't want any religion influencing government. . .





And looking at a couple more quotes from Jefferson. . .

"I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition [Christianity] one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded on fables and mythology."--Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Short, _Six_Historic_Americans_ by John E. Remsberg

"Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned, yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity [of opinion]. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites."--Thomas Jefferson, _Notes_on_the_State_of_Virginia_(1781-85), _

"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."--Thomas Jefferson to Baron von Humboldt in 1813, _The_Writings_of_Thomas_Jefferson_Memorial_Edition_, edited by Lipscomb and Bergh, 14:21



And a couple more by Ben Franklin:

"I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue. The scriptures assure me that at the last day we shall not be examined on what we thought but what we did." - Benjamin Franklin letter to his father, 1738

"I cannot conceive otherwise than that He, the Infinite Father, expects or requires no worship or praise from us, but that He is even infinitely above it." - Benjamin Franklin from "Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion", Nov. 20, 1728


And what the heck; a few words from James Madison:

"What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not." - James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785

"Experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution." - James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785



. . makes it pretty obvious that the foundation of how our country will be governed as written and envisioned by the most influential men involved in creating it was not Christian- it was Deist.

And while Desim is a religion of sorts, Deists do not believe Jesus was the Son of God made Man, hence they were not Christians, hence Deist rational thought based on Greek philosophy are what formed the foundations of the ideas of democracy in America, not Christian traditions .

In fact, it's pretty obvious they didn't want any kind of religion playing a part in the US Government. . .


I do think the majority of people here in the US consider themselves Christian, but do I think we're a "Christian nation"? In some ways yes, but at least on paper we are not and never have been.
 
Originally posted by Kendra17
The problem we have now is that extremism is now the Islamic voice the world hears and sees. Certainly Christianity had its extreme period. The extremism that you discuss in every religion--Judaism and Christianity specifically are extraordinary events. Christianity and Judaism are not militant warfare-based religions. Koran itself, which I've read and studied, commands its adherents to kill nonbelievers and that is exactly what they are doing. There are no specific commands in the Old or New Testaments to eradicate people who do not adhere to those religions. The Koran, on the other hand, specifically commands Muslims to kill nonbelievers.


?
w. Islam has never had a reformation and probably never will. The war on terrorism should actually be called the war on Islamofacism with terrorism as a tactic, but of course, for political reasons, it won't be called that. It should also be noted that Judism and Christianity has never referred to itself as a "religion" but as a faith. Islam has referred to itself as a religion. Turkey is an islamic country and is also a democracy however. I think that eventually it will be doable.
 
Oh, this is a touchy one. Hope I don't get flamed. We can respect everyone's opinions here, right?

I would never vote for an Atheist. Sorry, but I just wouldn't. I have strong religious values, and I think that in this day and age, we need someone with them in the white house. JMO
 

OK HollyJoy give me one example of how an Athiest would make a different political decision than a Christian. Your implication is that Athiests have no morals and I completely disagree with that. Presidents don't make theological decisions they make political ones. Secondly would you vote for a Jew?
 
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
It's not an updated version, it's the original.
Ah, so the use of the common phrase "year of our Lord" somehow denotes that the U.S. is a "Christian nation", despite the addition of the First Amendment? :confused:
 
Originally posted by JoeThaNo1Stunna
I am not a Christian, but there is no denying that America is a Christian nation. That doesn't mean that our government has an official religion, it just means we are a Christian nation. I think some people read too much into a statement like that.
Maybe someone can explain how a "nation" can be a Christian. My understanding is that being a Christian requires an exercise of faith to accept an atonement for sins committed against God and that this is an individual and personal act performed by a person. I am confused as to how a "nation" can do this and find it odd when the term Christian is used as a modifier like this. It paints with a broad brush and denies the diverse beliefs and religions represented in America today. While Christianity may be the majority belief, it certainly does not represent 100% of the people in this country.
 
/
Originally posted by Abracadabra
Ah, so the use of the common phrase "year of our Lord" somehow denotes that the U.S. is a "Christian nation", despite the addition of the First Amendment? :confused:

I'm sorry, could you please point out to me where I ever said the U.S. is a Christian nation? Or where I said that the phrase "year of our Lord" denotes us as such?

I brought it up to counter the incorrect statement that there was no mention of God in the Constitution. If "...our Lord" doesn't refer to God, perhaps you could enlighten me as to whom it is referring.
 
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
I'm sorry, could you please point out to me where I ever said the U.S. is a Christian nation? Or where I said that the phrase "year of our Lord" denotes us as such?

I brought it up to counter the incorrect statement that there was no mention of God in the Constitution. If "...our Lord" doesn't refer to God, perhaps you could enlighten me as to whom it is referring.
The phrase "year of our Lord" is an English translation of Anno Domini or A.D. It was an accepted way of designating time ... B.C. and A.D. I don't believe that this use constitutes any sort of acknowledgement of God in the Constitution any more than my smashing my finger with a hammer while nailing and screaming "Good God Almighty" makes me a Christian, or eating at McDonalds makes me a Big Mac.
 
Originally posted by Abracadabra
The phrase "year of our Lord" is an English translation of Anno Domini or A.D. It was an accepted way of designating time ... B.C. and A.D. I don't believe that this use constitutes any sort of acknowledgement of God in the Constitution any more than my smashing my finger with a hammer while nailing and screaming "Good God Almighty" makes me a Christian, or eating at McDonalds makes me a Big Mac.

You are free to believe whatever you choose, but I disagree.
 
Originally posted by Kendra17
For a more accurate view of Islam, why not read the Closed Circle by Steven Emerson or some of Bernard Lewis' works?

Actually, I have...the idea of Steven Emerson's works being an unbiased source of truth makes me laugh.
On the other hand, Bernard Lewis only strengthened my beliefs regarding Islam and Christianity. He reminds us that throughout history, there have been a lot of parallels between the two religions.
 
Originally posted by Abracadabra
Thanks for demonstrating your stranglehold of the obvious.

Is there some particular reason you are being so rude and nasty this morning, or is it just the way you behave normally?
 
Originally posted by kpgclark
OK HollyJoy give me one example of how an Athiest would make a different political decision than a Christian. Your implication is that Athiests have no morals and I completely disagree with that. Presidents don't make theological decisions they make political ones. Secondly would you vote for a Jew?

Stop reading into things. I NEVER said that an Athiest wouldn't have morals. Did you even read my post, or just skim through it? Here's what I wrote:

"I would never vote for an Atheist. Sorry, but I just wouldn't. I have strong religious values, and I think that in this day and age, we need someone with them in the white house. JMO"

I said that it is my opinion that we need someone with RELIGIOUS values in the White House. That's my belief. I live my life as a Christian, so that's how I think. And do I think that an Athiest would make a different political decision than a Christian? Well that's something that I can't predict, so I won't even attempt to do so. Would I vote for a Jew? ABSOLUTELY!
 
What religious values does a president have that would make him more effective than an athiest? What decisions can a religious person make politically that would be any different than an athiest?
 
Originally posted by AirForceRocks
Is there some particular reason you are being so rude and nasty this morning, or is it just the way you behave normally?
Written communication is able to capture only 7% of the entire message someone attempts to "send." The remaining 93% is composed of eye contact, body language, tone, inflection, pace, volume, etc. -- none of which can be accurately or effectively portrayed on an Internet message board.

I'd suggest that you not read so much into what someone else has written, thus leading to unfounded conclusions. If you are sensing rude and nasty, I'd suggest that only 7% is coming from what you read and the other 93% is coming from within.
 
Originally posted by Abracadabra
Written communication is able to capture only 7% of the entire message someone attempts to "send." The remaining 93% is composed of eye contact, body language, tone, inflection, pace, volume, etc. -- none of which can be accurately or effectively portrayed on an Internet message board.

I'd suggest that you not read so much into what someone else has written, thus leading to unfounded conclusions. If you are sensing rude and nasty, I'd suggest that only 7% is coming from what you read and the other 93% is coming from within.

Or, alternatively, if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

I think someone accomplished at the written word can manage to convey exactly what they mean, even without the visual.

JMHO.
 
Originally posted by missyc
I do believe that someone starting his day out on his knees is being led in the right direction.
One would be very egotistical to think he could do it without guidance from God.


ITA:D

I would never ever vote for an Athiest.

-BUT I WILL SAY THIS-

Just as there is good and bad in all races, there is also good and bad in christians and non christians.
There are non christians who have a bigger-kinder-gentler heart than "most christians"--Just as there are christians who keep up more hell than satan-who also attend church EVERY SUNDAY but chose to live wrong do the wrong thing Mon-Sat.

Another thing people make the mistake by trying to force their beliefs onto Athiest. That's not the way to do it. If one asked me "Do you think I'm going to hell if I don't accept The Lord Jesus Christ our Savior honestly I would answer yes!

If they asked me do I believe their life is damned due to not accepting christ again I'll answer yes----because--- Your going to serve GOD or the other. "I" believe in GOD'S word. "MY BELIEFS"


Imho, Ahtiest have to find their own way without being ambused.

again this is only my opinion
 
Originally posted by Pongo69
Another thing people make the mistake by trying to force their beliefs onto Athiest. That's not the way to do it. If one asked me "Do you think I'm going to hell if I don't accept The Lord Jesus Christ our Savior honestly I would answer yes!
Wow...So, like 90% of the world's population is going to hell ? Jews...muslims...budhists....atheists....All of them doomed to eternal torment, huh ?

And some people wonder why a lot of people have a MAJOR problem with this kind of thinking in the white house ? :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by Maleficent13
Or, alternatively, if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

I think someone accomplished at the written word can manage to convey exactly what they mean, even without the visual.

JMHO.
Visual is just one part. You are missing hearing which is a major part.

But I respect your opinions. And thanks for the compliment... Quack, quack! :laughing:
 





New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top