cggmommy said:My friend has offered his BCV 150 pts contract for 8,500. Does this have any chance of ROFR? Is there anyway to buy this from my friend without doing ROFR? New to DVC and don't really know how it all works. Advice welcome
I'm not an owner yet but I'm interested to hear.
I mean since its your friend I'm assuming escrow etc isn't needed so Disney doesn't necessarily need to know money has changed hands. There must be a way for a member to give their contract to a family member or friend.
...Disney doesn't necessarily need to know money has changed hands. There must be a way for a member to give their contract to a family member or friend.
drusba said:OP, any legitimate sale, which it would be with your friend, must go through ROFR, and at that price there is a real risk of Disney exercising its right.
Actual gifts of points (to relatives or otherwise) also go through ROFR but Disney really does not have a right to exercise ROFR with a gift. However, it has the right to confirm it is a gift and any gift needs to go through ROFR so that Disney files a waiver of the exercise of ROFR in the public record so that the public record shows the transfer is free and clear of all ROFR rights.
Adding off-beat provisions like the suggested car washing or watching kids (or, as some have tried to defeat ROFR rights, throwing in something that cannot be matched like a photo album of one's family), can be challenged in three ways by Disney: (a) it can assert ROFR and sue to have the extra items valued for the purpose of the ROFR; (b) it can sue the seller for breach of contract including violation of his implied obligation of good faith for trying to avoid ROFR, and (c) potentially sue the buyer for interference with Disney's contractual rights with the seller if the buyer is aware that the item is being added to avoid ROFR. To put it mildy, your litigation costs (including for the attorney you will need to hire), even if you were lucky enough to win, are likely going to be more than you would ever pay for that 150 point contract.
Really not trying to be misleading. I didn't negotiate the price, it is the price my friend offered cause they know we could pay cash for that amount. I just thought if we depleted the banked points with renting for our stay this year and in the contract stated that the $2000 we are paying would be included to make the total to $10500 then it might have a better chance to pass ROFR but I didn't know if renting could even be a clause on a contract. I really want to purchase the points but we can only do that if we can pay cash. My friend just wants out. It is a win win for us but not if Disney buys it back. He still wins but I don't. I was trying to figure out how to go about getting an awesome deal without being fraudulent, because obviously Disney has much more resources to fight and fraud is not worth it.
I am the only person I know of that's gone through such a situation, it was a non DVC timeshare traded for DVC points. DVD required us to put a dollar value on the other timeshare and that was their basis for considering ROFR. I might have been able to force their hand but it wasn't worth fighting with them at the time. I'd be careful with fancy worded contracts obviously intended to bypass ROFR, I'd get a RE attorney to advise me if I planned to go that route.Putting a disclaimer out there that I have no clue on the legality part of this but...
What if the contract also had some sort of barter / trade / service in addition to the money. For instance, you will wash your friends car or agree to watch their children for X number of times so they could have date night. Or free use of your trampoline or pool for X amount of years.
I think this would still qualify as consideration to satisfy the contract and wouldn't Disney have to agree to do those in addition to the funds to take it in ROFR?
Although this seems so simple, it has most likely been thought of. Maybe a monetary amount would be assigned to the service or something which would keep it from passing ROFR.
Really not trying to be misleading. I didn't negotiate the price, it is the price my friend offered cause they know we could pay cash for that amount. I just thought if we depleted the banked points with renting for our stay this year and in the contract stated that the $2000 we are paying would be included to make the total to $10500 then it might have a better chance to pass ROFR but I didn't know if renting could even be a clause on a contract. I really want to purchase the points but we can only do that if we can pay cash. My friend just wants out. It is a win win for us but not if Disney buys it back. He still wins but I don't. I was trying to figure out how to go about getting an awesome deal without being fraudulent, because obviously Disney has much more resources to fight and fraud is not worth it.
There's nothing keeping one from selling to a friend, it's that there are other issues, namely ROFR. As for the gift, it'd be OK if listed on the contract but fraud if not. I think the thing that's being missed is that DVD has a legal right and depriving them of that right can be illegal.Okay, I'm not a lawyer and I am generally very much a rule-follower. But it also seems to me that a friend should be able to sell a friend something like a DVC contract at a discount if they want to. Here is an idea that I'm sure the more experienced and legally-minded members out there can comment on.
What if the OP purchased the contract from his friend for a reasonable, market price that Disney is unlikely to ROFR; let's say $12,500 (rather than the $8,500 originally discussed). Then what if the friend simply gave $4,000 back to the purchaser as a gift between friends--in theory completed unrelated to the transaction that just took place with the DVC contract. Would that work?
What if the OP purchased the contract from his friend for a reasonable, market price that Disney is unlikely to ROFR; let's say $12,500 (rather than the $8,500 originally discussed). Then what if the friend simply gave $4,000 back to the purchaser as a gift between friends--in theory completed unrelated to the transaction that just took place with the DVC contract. Would that work?