luvdzny said:
Actually, I never nursed my kids and never had that problem. Why would you feel sorry for me?
I do not appreciate seeing anyone nursing in public. If breasts were meant to be exposed why is it illegal to go topless? Bottles are meant for feeding and they are allowed to be seen in public. If a mom wishes to breastfeed that is her choice, but I don't think others should have to see it, that is why there are baby care centers at Disney.
Okay, I'm a pretty moderate breast-feeder. With my first two I would **never** have nursed in public. My third was a super preemie - 1lb 15 oz. It was then that we began researching what is good about breastmilk. My fourth was nursed with no solids introduced until 12 months. The World Health Organization pushes for breastmilk until **at least** two years.
Do I feel sorry for you? Yes, honestly I do. Not because you made a bad choice but because you don't know what you're missing. Kind of like all of you feel for me because I have never been to Disney World yet, lol!

My fifth child was unable to nurse due to a severe allergy problem that I was not educated enough to overcome, and the lactation consultants were unable to help me. I'll tell you the bond between a very loving mother and child is different between a nursed child and a non-nursed child. You can post on here that that is absolutely not true... but you can't post with any credibility. I've done both. We are a very attached family. We co-sleep, sling, etc., but the bond between a nursing mother and child is very, very, very different than a child that can take a bottle from just anyone.
The reason it is illegal to go topless because in our Judeo Christian society we've made laws to help out with modesty. I firmly believe (as a Christian) that modesty is a GREAT thing. I think every mama should be able to nurse in public. I also think that she should consider others (especially young boys) and nurse modestly with no skin showing. I've nursed newborns, toddlers, and everywhere in between and nursing modestly can be done with practice!!!!! We owe society that much just as they owe us respect for simply feeding babies.
That said,
BOTTLES ARE FOR FEEDING??
Are you kidding me?

Yes, God created woman and then He created the plastic bottle for her to feed the baby. Hmmm... not quite.

Baby monkeys fed on bottles don't thrive. That is why they have false mothers (complete with hairy chests) to "nurse" baby monkeys. Babies fed and not cuddled or don't get skin to skin contact have failure to thrive... Romanian orphanages are a great example of this. Any mother of a super preemie can tell you just how vital "kangarooing" is - skin to skin contact. This is vital. Babies with lots of skin to skin contact do better. In the NICUs they have dads and moms undo their shirts to put the baby right on the skin, no kidding. A bottle is a poor substitute. I've bottlefed, so please don't think I'm being condescending. However, it was an absolute medical necessity at the time. I don't blame mamas who must bottle feed one bit! They are doing what is best and necessary for their babies. But to say that BOTTLES are for FEEDING?!!!! Wow... I didn't think that ANYONE believed that formula was the same as breastmilk anymore. Breastmilk is a living material. It has immunological benefits that absolutely cannot be duplicated. That's like feeding a child a bottle of canola oil with added vitamins and saying, "There. It's nutritionally complete." It may be complete with all vitamins and minerals but it doesn't make it a healthy substitute for fresh fruits and veggies.
I'll admit... I'm shocked.