Goofy_Disney_Dad
Can go Grumpy on occasion too...
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 4,105
I feel like I'm repeating myself here: Is there an article indicating this employee got in trouble? I haven't seen one.
All aboard!!!!!

I feel like I'm repeating myself here: Is there an article indicating this employee got in trouble? I haven't seen one.

But, this more than likely will be viewed by the powers that be as very grievous. This opens Disney up to liability issues whether any of us agree with it or not.
True but they would be opened up to liability issues whether they fired the employee or not. What I'm saying is that each incident is different and that should be part of the policy. In a case like this, the CM simply tried to split the parties up; it would be quite different if he started pummelling the guests.

Post # 231 from a CM. I've no doubt there are investigations going on from Disney.I feel like I'm repeating myself here: Is there an article indicating this employee got in trouble? I haven't seen one.
I thought any one strike and you're out rule was stupid?A good employer would only use a one strike and you're out rule on something truly grievous. If you have that has never had a problem, you should be not be automatically firing them without examining the circumstances of the incident.
I've spent more years working at inner-city schools than I care to admit. We are instructed to not break up fights. Ever. Call for the (armed) officer that works in our building and get out of the way. There have been times that staff has jumped in. One family came up to the school and got in by saying they needed to pick up their child early. Instead they jumped a different child that was in line with a class because the families didn't get along. You can bet we all jumped in. Officer, principal, teachers, counselors jumped in and pulled three people off that child. Could we have been fired? Absolutely. However there is no way any of us would allow a child to be hurt that way. Sometimes jumping in and breaking up fights is unavoidable or is just the right thing to do even if you do get fired. Using an umbrella as a weapon in a small enclosed space that is filled with children is so wholly unacceptable. The cm did a fantastic job and if he loses his job that would be awful. However, the bigger disappointment, aside from witnessing the breakdown of society via cellphone, is Disney security. Where were they? Why wouldn't Disney put their foot down and say you need to leave? Surely kicking out one or two families won't impact their revenue. I always felt safe going to WDW because I figured if anything truly terrible happened all those plain clothes security guards I read about would jump right in. Maybe those guys don't really exist...makes me second guess disneys ability to deal with critical emergency situations if they can't handle a small fight in a line.
But they can mitigate some of those liability issues by revealing that the CM was fired due to their actions. It's the legal game being played. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but I have no doubt how it would play out if it were to become reality.
I agree with you, that's probably what would happen. My point is and always has been is that having rules such as those are stupid and will most likely cost you good employees and harm employee morale.
I thought any one strike and you're out rule was stupid?
And I agree with you on this as well. Unfortunately, a company has to look at the legal ramifications of their policies and decide their importance. Also unfortunate is that they rarely worry about whether employees will be bothered by those decisions.
and we are back to where we started, that's a stupid way of treating employees.

In today's day and age they better plan for heavy security and response times no more than a few minutes. Heck, we have had deescalation training, active shooter training, anti-terrorism training and the list gets longer each year. I would certainly hope a place like WDW would provide their CMs the same training and the security force to back them up.In my opinion the plain clothed security is not as large in quantity or as effective as everyone wishes they were. The area is just too large for someone to be able to respond to any situation at any time within seconds, or even minutes. I'm sure there are areas where a response time would be minimal. I doubt they plan for a heavy security presence in ride lines. It just wouldn't be a cost effective way to budget for such rare incidents.
All aboard!!!!!![]()
I have a feeling that if the CM just stood there talking to these women and they hurt anyone in line, people would be asking why he just stood there and did nothing...regardless of what he is told to do. Then we would have people who would say that if it was them, they would break the rules in the interest of public safety....