I was looking at booking a couple weeks at a number of different resorts at Disney World. I picked the resorts based on my preference. My home resort is BLT. Looking at doing at split stay in a 1 br. I thought it would be a good idea to do a comparison of the points I would need for the same 2 weeks at other resorts. First time I have done this and I was surprised by the results.For Animal Kingdom I would need 7% fewer points. For the other resorts I would need far more points, ranging from an extra 27% at Riviera to 32% at VGF.
My thoughts are that the premium required for the more expensive resorts isn’t really justified when you compare them with cash rates. I would also argue that Animal kingdom should probably be cheaper in points terms compared with BLT.
My conclusion is that based on this limited sample BLT looks a bargain and hopefully a good refurbishment will spark additional interest for BLT on the resale market.
My thoughts are that the premium required for the more expensive resorts isn’t really justified when you compare them with cash rates. I would also argue that Animal kingdom should probably be cheaper in points terms compared with BLT.
My conclusion is that based on this limited sample BLT looks a bargain and hopefully a good refurbishment will spark additional interest for BLT on the resale market.
Resort | Week 1 | Week 2 | Total | Points difference | % difference |
BLT lake view | 306 | 242 | 548 | ||
Grand Floridian lake view | 407 | 317 | 724 | 176 | 32% |
Riviera preferred view | 391 | 305 | 696 | 148 | 27% |
Animal Kingdom SV | 272 | 235 | 507 | -41 | -7% |
Poly Tower preferred view | 399 | 308 | 707 | 159 | 29% |
Last edited: