I think a productive discussion here should involve an assessment of what could/should have been done differently to try to prevent or at least minimize what occurred. Disappointing as it is that someone would take advantage of another person's generosity, this does point out (once again) that there are those who will take advantage of others and there are measures we should all be aware of to try to avoid such disappointment in the future.
The poster in question has not even visited the DIS since 9/29/08 and has not posted since 9/05/08. They originally registered for the DIS in September, 2005 and have a total of just over 140 posts in 3 years. I have attempted to contact this poster by both email and PM. My email was bounced as undeliverable and the PM has not been opened.
Fortunately, the amount of money involved here is not substantial - but, what other measures could have been taken with this transaction - knowing that
DVC would not intervene after-the-fact to resolve any irregularity ?
1. Did the poster review past posts by this person to have a comfortable feeling who they were dealing with?
2. Did the poster have a contract spelling out the details agreed to in advance? Was a home address and telephone number known prior to initiating the transfer?
3. Why was payment in full not demanded in advance - especially since this was an irreversible transaction? Alternately, why not
at least demand 1/2 payment prior to the transfer and the balance immediately afterwards? In that fashion, both parties would have been at risk to some extent. With a reservation more than 30 days from arrival, the member at least would be able to have all points returned to their account if payment was not received, but with a transfer there is no protection at all for the transferring member after the transfer was completed.
What other concerns could have been addressed in advance in this situation?