Better for Lunch than Dinner

[etail]

So I started wondering if there were restaurants that were better for lunch than dinner. Not necessarily just price wise but with the changes in food offerings. Any thoughts?

 

[figment_jii]

Assuming things stay the same, I like LTT for lunch (a la carte menu with the Ooey Gooey Toffee Cake) than for dinner (family style). I also like BOG's lunch menu better than the dinner menu.

 

[Kimosabe]

We love Chefs de France for lunch, but have never even really wanted to go for dinner. There is certainly some overlap in the two menus, but while my wife loves the beef short rib entrée (available at both meals and basically the same price at either), my daughters love the Croque Monsieur, which is only available at lunch. I would guess we have eaten here more than at any other restaurant on property.

 

[ncc1701]

Another vote for Chef's at lunch due to the menu. I love the quiche but it isn't offered at dinner. Altho the menus are the same we prefer lunch at Mama Melrose over dinner. Both times we did dinner it felt rushed . I had a flatbread and the crust was undercooked compared to lunch.
We also have sworn off Rose & Crown at dinner. We had several good lunches there but after 2 mediocre dinners where the fish in my fish & chips was under cooked & DH 's sheperd's pie was lukewarm we didn't go back the last 2 trips.

 

[minnie mum]

Not us, but some prefer Sanaa for lunch. Both for the menu and for the view.

 

[etail]

Hmmm... yes Sanaa and LTT were on my mind. Hadn't thought about CdF or MM. Any other thought?

 

[wdwrich]

Another vote for LTT lunch over dinner.

 

[Simba's Mom]

Frankly, I prefer every TS restaurant at lunchtime over dinnertime. It's always quieter and less hectic. Like others, my favorite preference is LTT since the menu's different (Ooey Gooey Toffee Cake). One that hasn't been mentioned is Coral Reef, much nicer and quieter at lunchtime.