But it’s not like the summer inventory, as I recall anyway provided a lot to choose from. Yesterday I bid $4 under ask on a not-so-recently listed 250 point SSR looking to “get my money’s” worth and was not countered plus the seller then re-listed higher. Their prerogative. But I’m not biting. SSR may have been undervalued for a while, I don’t know. But asks are $20-$30 higher in 6 months. If they can sell there, good on em. But not to me. If I’m not alone then prices will soften somewhat. We’ll see.
I’ll ask the more seasoned observers like Dean - have you seen a similar price ramp up over a short period such as this before? Thanks.
I can't say I've seen anything this extreme but we've seen this extreme previously was where prices dropped. We will again in all likelihood but it'll likely coincide with an economic downturn which might be less likely now in the short term with the tax changes than it was previously. Personally I'd decide if
DVC makes sense where one is today looking at DVC as it functions, price, resale vs retail, and whether DVC makes sense in general (plan ahead, pay cash, use only DVC, for DVC only and the like). But what I might do in today's environment is to be even more likely to underbuy (lower resort, less points) but not too extreme. I likely would not buy for future needs, only what they are now, unless the current needs put me under 150 points and/or future needs are not too far off. I would also be more critical of possible risks such as job loss or health issues at the higher commitment.
This illustrates one of the frustrations I have with some of the threads about usage and buying, that what I or someone else bought or was able two do owning 5, 10 for 15 years ago really doesn't have much meaning for today. DVC is different than it was 10-15 years ago and it will continue to change & evolve. Often those changes will be negative to a subset of the membership. I find it interesting that when people are discussing buying they often assume that the current situation will continue and that usually their normal assumptions are actually close to the the best case scenario. Here's an example, there are those that have gone out and bought smaller contracts with the idea of having an exit strategy or leaving a legacy. That's fine except they often pay a premium to do so, frequently about $10 per point depending on specifics. There are 3 issues with this strategy, there's no guarantee they will be more valuable long term (I'd say it's 50/50 at best), one shouldn't buy anyway planning to sell and there's no way to know if the legacy will be a blessing or a curse.
My personal bottom line would simply be if DVC makes sense sense in my personal situation and the current realities. It may not for some that it would have a few years ago. DVC needs to offer a clear savings looking at the real risks and costs. Look at what the break even is considering the real costs of TVM, opportunity costs, inflation, investing the additional dollars and comparing to reasonable costs either what one would have spent or to a private rental rate NOT the rack rate even discounted.