I'm very confused - someone is giving me incorrect info and while i THINK I know who it is, I'd like confirmation from someone here well-versed in banking rules.
The scenario as I understood it was as follows:
Resale contract, UY is April, 300 pt contract. 150 pts have already been banked (time of banking unknown), 150 still available in current yr (4/1/06 - 3/31/07).
Sales agent at resale firm (2 of them, actually) insisted "100% sure" I would have until the end of Dec to bank the remaining points.
Disney guide was just as adamant that it is too late to bank the second 150 (had until 9/30/06 to do so), and they must be used before 4/1/07 or will expire.
Resale sales agent offered to email Disney and get confirmation that he is correct and forward same to me; I said "please do".
Interestingly enough, each company quoted the same written rules to me, but each interpreted them 180 degrees apart. I read the rules, and it seems pretty clear that the Disney guide is correct, but I'd like a more experienced opinion. Based on the facts outlined, which answer is correct?
The answer does not matter in the specifics, because (a) the resale agent called to say that the points could not be banked because seller did not bank the first 150 until October and (b) the seller managed to get Disney to bank the second 150 pts, making it a moot point. However, the answer seems important to me, because the value of the contract is most definitely affected by these points. Shouldn't a salesperson be well versed in the banking rules, especially as it can impact a contract?
Also, how about points on hold? Is it no more than 30 days in advance, or no more than 60? (another set of conflicting info) Seems to be another rule with which each sales person should be vell-versed.
The more I ponder these conflicts, the less of a "warm & fuzzy" feeling I have. Am I putting too much importance on this, or am I right to be concerned, at least a little bit?
The scenario as I understood it was as follows:
Resale contract, UY is April, 300 pt contract. 150 pts have already been banked (time of banking unknown), 150 still available in current yr (4/1/06 - 3/31/07).
Sales agent at resale firm (2 of them, actually) insisted "100% sure" I would have until the end of Dec to bank the remaining points.
Disney guide was just as adamant that it is too late to bank the second 150 (had until 9/30/06 to do so), and they must be used before 4/1/07 or will expire.
Resale sales agent offered to email Disney and get confirmation that he is correct and forward same to me; I said "please do".
Interestingly enough, each company quoted the same written rules to me, but each interpreted them 180 degrees apart. I read the rules, and it seems pretty clear that the Disney guide is correct, but I'd like a more experienced opinion. Based on the facts outlined, which answer is correct?
The answer does not matter in the specifics, because (a) the resale agent called to say that the points could not be banked because seller did not bank the first 150 until October and (b) the seller managed to get Disney to bank the second 150 pts, making it a moot point. However, the answer seems important to me, because the value of the contract is most definitely affected by these points. Shouldn't a salesperson be well versed in the banking rules, especially as it can impact a contract?
Also, how about points on hold? Is it no more than 30 days in advance, or no more than 60? (another set of conflicting info) Seems to be another rule with which each sales person should be vell-versed.
The more I ponder these conflicts, the less of a "warm & fuzzy" feeling I have. Am I putting too much importance on this, or am I right to be concerned, at least a little bit?
