CleveRocks
Rock 'n' Roller Coaster worshipper
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Messages
- 9,589
Hello, Greg.GregoryNicolas said:I'm not crying, on the contrary, I know exactly what I did wrong and it wasn't charging the $20.00 extra. That is 100% legal. The OP asked for extra services (the ones we charged-not counting the ones we could have) after she had paid one week earlier (when she was droped at the Port). My driver knew all was paid for when she came to the port to pick them up to go back to the airport. She also knew there was only ONE stop on the way back, not 4. She also knew the client had already paid for the way back to the airport but the pick-up time was 9:30am not 10:15am.
I have ALL the right to charge for extra stops, extra time, and any extra service ordered by our clients or forced on us over what was paid for originaly and agreed upon on their confirmation. I DO NOT need authorization nor a signature as a service provider as long as the charges are proven reasonable and true; and again I must say, we NEVER had a charge back due to overcharging after 15.000 clients. I'm not about to start now.
Another disinterested third party here.
I went to a restaurant last night. The menu says the kids meal comes with milk. I ask the waitress if my son can get chocolate milk instead of regular milk and she says okay.
The menu says that my entree comes with a side dish of pasta. I know that the restaurant makes a "rosa" sauce that I just crave like nothing else -- the rosa sauce uses more expensive ingredients and takes more labor to produce than the usual marinara sauce. I ask the waitress if I can get my side of pasta with the rosa sauce instead of marinara sauce, and she says okay.
The caesar salad had some anchovies on it, but I just love anchovies and ask the waitress if I can have a few more, and she says okay.
I paid my bill as presented to me, by credit card. I later find out that $10 was added to my credit card charge for the extras I requested.
If I knew I was going to be charged extra, I probably would have been okay with it. But my not knowing about it makes it a rude (and perhaps illegal) move on the part of the restaurant's owner.
I get to choose how I spend my money. It is not proper for money to be taken from me if I don't know about it and certainly didn't authorize it. No excuses.
The restaurant owner probably felt me a pushy customer with a high sense of entitlement, or perhaps that I was improperly trying to get things for free, or both! That's fine, everyone's entitled to their opinion -- God Bless America! But the restaurant owner is not entitled to take money from me that I didn't authorize.
The waitress, as the owner's agent, authorized the extra services to me, and the lack of communication between the waitress and the restaurant owner is an internal problem of the business, and should never have become my problem. If the owner thought I wasn't paying my fair share for the services I received, then I should have been informed I would need to pay more, OR I should have had those extra services denied to me.
Does this example make sense to you, and does it help you see how I and others are apparently viewing the OP's situation?