Boski
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Messages
- 919
This is what happens when you invest in a ride rationing system instead of net new additions to the parks.
Which probably would have cost less!
This is what happens when you invest in a ride rationing system instead of net new additions to the parks.
This is the 2nd bad earnings report in a row for DIS. The stock price is down 20% from it's highs. These greedy Disney executives are foaming at the mouth in anger over this. They have lost hundreds of millions in personal wealth because of the decline. At this very moment they are having a meeting demanding more ways to cut services and raise prices at theme parks. You thought it was getting bad, wait until you see what's coming.
If the overruns on MyMagic+ are true I think it would be enough.I believe that in part they are. I also think that rapid uptick in costs when coupled with reduced services and staffing also are linked to the quarterly reports. I have never believed that within a corporation as large as Disney, any one event is responsible for changes, charges, or increased gains or losses. If you look at Shanghai or My Magic+ as individual slices of a pie, would either be enough ruin the numbers? I don't know.
If the overruns on MyMagic+ are true I think it would be enough.
That would be Iger...I will say that whoever got them involved with Shanghai needs to go. Yesterday.
I'm very surprised to see an attendance drop, in light of the out-of-control wait times. If you've been following the touringplans.com crowd calendar, you'll see that wait times have been above average for the last 1-2 years. If there are actually less people in the parks, are the longer waits due to FastPass+ issues? Or perhaps, lowering the capacity of the rides to save money (less maintenance, less wages)?
That would be Iger...
I think that that the wait times are a combination of reduced ride capacity and more people in one park than the others at any given time. I know that I avoided DAK and DS for a long time because I cannot stand the walls. Attractions that never had a line really, now routinely have lines that I never experienced b
Disney wants scenario 1 everytime which they have been getting a lot lately until yesterday's report.Of the four scenarios, I'm not even sure which I would pick.
Leaning towards #2 so it gives them rev to do whats needed to increase attendance, #1 might be rev but slow down any urgency for attendance, #3 and #4 might slash expansion and more cost cutting, not sure what it would do to pricing.
Certainly consequences of good and bad for each.
With expansion budgets looking amazing, kinda leaning towards a "Rev Up" for sure so the slashing doesn't start. Torn on attendance-not sure what Up or Down of that would/will lead to.
1) Rev Up, Atten Up
2) Rev Up, Atten down
3) Rev down, Atten Up
4) Rev down, Atten down
The thing is .. "wait times" are just for those who don't get a Fast Pass.I think that that the wait times are a combination of reduced ride capacity and more people in one park than the others at any given time. I know that I avoided DAK and DS for a long time because I cannot stand the walls. Attractions that never had a line really, now routinely have lines that I never experienced b
Disney wants scenario 1 everytime which they have been getting a lot lately until yesterday's report.
It really doesn't matter what you or I want. I don't own stock in Disney. If I did I would want revenue up and I don't think attendance would matter as much.But what did you want to see?
It really doesn't matter what you or I want. I don't own stock in Disney. If I did I would want revenue up and I don't think attendance would matter as much.
As just a regular guest I don't care. If crowds are down good but prices are higher than ever. If I was a stock holder I would want revenue up for sure but attendance I could go either way.None of this discussion matters, I just meant as the consumer and informed WDW guest-would you have a preference and why?
The title of discussion thread.
As just a regular guest I don't care. If crowds are down good but prices are higher than ever. If I was a stock holder I would want revenue up for sure but attendance I could go either way.
I think if attendance continues to go down you'll see changes whether it be less price increases or more additions to the parks.No preference then on these quarterly reports for Revenue and Attendance, I can see that.![]()