malibuconlee said:I believe they have meant it's the mother not being able to "let go" and have the child grow up, not as a sexual thing.
Yes, I think you are exactly right!
malibuconlee said:I believe they have meant it's the mother not being able to "let go" and have the child grow up, not as a sexual thing.
What is the big deal about a child being in a crib till age 3? If there not jumping out and hurting themselves and they like it so what.Jenn Lynn said:Somewhere between 21-22 months with DD. She was down to only a couple times a day at that point. By the time I weaned her I was very ready to be done and she was ready too. She didn't put up much of a fight. I plan on trying to go that long with DS. If it is sooner it will be because one of us can't take it any more!
DVCLiz-No agenda. I see nothing wrong with BFing a 2 year old.
Personally I wonder about the 3 year olds who are still in cribs. DD was in her own twin bed at at 1.5. To each their own!
LindsayDunn228 said:Let me ask you this: what reason do you think it would be totally fine to breastfeed an average healthy 6 year old?
Mermaid02 said:I took it more of a for her own emotional needs. More of a need to be needed sort of thing.
Personally I think BF past the age of 2 is not right, and even then I think that's pushing it, but that's just my opinion. Again, this is just my opinion, but everyone gets in a tizzy over children being on bottles past a certain age, I don't think it should be any different for nursing children.CathrynRose said:Im not taking a stance of "YES, it's okay!" although I will not take a stance otherwise, either.
I dont know.
Again, not my babies - not my "bottles". I dont know the reasoning behind doing it for that long, or not. But it's not my business, to be in other peoples!
CathrynRose said:Hadnt thought of it that way - but didnt this woman have a younger child too? Or no?
Marseeya said:![]()
Then why participate in discussions?
I sure wouldn't get in somebody's business -- if I knew someone like this, I would never say a word. But on a discussion board, I don't see a problem with talking about issues pertaining to people we've never met or will never know.
ChrisnSteph said:BF a 6 year old child is wrong on so many levels!Personally I think BF past the age of 2 is not right, and even then I think that's pushing it, but that's just my opinion. Again, this is just my opinion, but everyone gets in a tizzy over children being on bottles past a certain age, I don't think it should be any different for nursing children.
chobie said:What's not right about breastfeeding past 2?
Mermaid02 said:I don't know- but maybe as her child got older, she couldn't stand the thought of them not "needing" her so much anymore. In my opinion, this can be a reason that women nurse children that are well beyond needing breast milk nutritionally.
CathrynRose said:Im not taking a stance of "YES, it's okay!" although I will not take a stance otherwise, either.
I dont know.
Again, not my babies - not my "bottles". I dont know the reasoning behind doing it for that long, or not. But it's not my business, to be in other peoples!
chobie said:Breastfeeding is about more than calorie intake.
Marseeya said:![]()
Then why participate in discussions?
I sure wouldn't get in somebody's business -- if I knew someone like this, I would never say a word. But on a discussion board, I don't see a problem with talking about issues pertaining to people we've never met or will never know.
You said it better than I did 
Mermaid02 said:True. But what is the benefit to a 6 year old child? Comforting? We take their bottles and pacifiers away by then...
BuckNaked said:Exactly. Which is why I believe this mother and others like her do it for their own comfort and feelings of being needed rather than for their children.