Mermaid02 said:
True. But what is the benefit to a 6 year old child? Comforting? We take their bottles and pacifiers away by then...
I will say that I personally wouldn't go that long--but the nature of the discussion is lending to the general consensus that much younger ages are barely tolerable. It is less about if we find a problem with nursing a 6yo and more of a "how can anyone nurse their child longer than x years or y months--that's child abuse".
Unless you know the specifics of the relationship between the two--can't really judge if there is lack of benefit.
My 3yo--I had planned on stopping by age 2--but once she burned her toes--it was impossible. It was all about comfort--we reached a certain age that I had to wait until she could understand. Her 3rd birthday became the magical milestone for us and it was easy for her to understand and ween successfully.
However--I didn't go explain that to every Jane, Jill, and Sherry that came along--b/c it was my child, my breasts, my business and the law supports that.
In many other cultures they do wacky things we won't even consider. Co-sleeping for many years is one of them.
This mother obvoiusly practices attachment parenting and that is okay. Now--would I nurse until age 6--heck NO! The fact that my child could pull up my shirt--could articulate her request...was borderline for me--but I chose to continue nursing. Would I have loved to continue--sure. Would she--absolutely--did we? No. Why? B/c "I" felt it was time--noone else told me, noone else forced me--I just decided it was best for us.
Having a dissenting opinion to say it is the mother's choice--isn't being supportive directly about what she chose--just that it is her decision as a mom to make between her and her child.
As for me--I have seen 6, 7, and yes even 8yo--still holding onto binky. Chances are--the 6yo in question isn't walking around with mom's "bottle" in the mouth while he's playing his sony playstation.