Well, no, actually, we are paying for this bloke's healthcare regardless of whether he is in prison or not. Remember that our taxes pay the health service and it doesn't matter whether he's in prison or in the community. And I think they said that only 23 people had been released in our country on compassionate grounds, full-stop, so that sounds a very small proportion of people in prison. At the end of the day, if it's the law here, it's the law here and whilst you might disagree with it (and I'm not brilliantly happy about it either), I wouldn't be too happy if he was allowed to just be electrocuted or gassed in the States but I'd have to accept it as capital punishment is the law in your country. Not every terrorist is terminally ill and suddenly going to be compassionately released but to say it's simply due to cost is frankly illogical given we've been keeping this chap for several years and already paying for his cancer care - his last 3 months of life is hardly likely to dent our budget too much versus the rest of the money spent on keeping him already. There also seems to be serious concerns about the safety of his conviction in the first place which is glossed over on this forum. I don't know the specifics but it's quite clear that the people affected by the tragedy in the UK are in two minds as to his guilt.