Angel Ariel
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 1, 2006
- Messages
- 8,273
It's really semantics at this point- my original point is that I think fp+ allows more people access to single rides on more attractions, where fp allowed multiple rides for fewer people. FP+ evens things out among more people in that regard-
So if I were going to further define it- I'd say it spread the wealth better- but as I said, this is surely a matter of semantics at this point.![]()
I absoluteyl. agree that more people are getting single rides on attractions now, but personally I don't think it's entirely, or even mostly, because of the FP+ system itself. I think it has a lot to do with the marketing Disney is doing to make sure people know about the FP+ system and encouraging them to use it.
If Disney had put this much effort into publicizing legacy, I think more people would have gotten single rides under that system as well, because I think more people would have been heading to the FP machines and getting FPs while others were still waiting for their next window to open, which would have limited the amount of "re-riding" as well.
Basically, if legacy had been publicized at much as FP+ is, I think the amount of people using it would have been very similar to the amount using FP+. Because the number of people using it would have been so much higher, it would have been a much different system than it was (in terms of availability, re-riding, etc). The types of guests that legacy favored still would have been true (those who get there at RD), but distribution would have been more widespread, I think.