My goodness...everywhere I turn, there's horror stories about how the economy is going to collapse and America is going to shambles because of gas and food prices. Please tell me I'm not the only person that is not falling apart worrying about it! I'm not happy about it - but you work your budget around these things and go on with your life.
I think the truth is somewhere between the news' "The sky is falling" and your "So what?". I heard today on the news that housing across America is down 14.4% -- that's pretty scary in and of itself.
Lots of bad stuff IS happening; it isn't imaginary; however, it isn't the first time that we've had radical economical issues -- it's just the first time in a while, and we're awfully comfortable with our spendy ways, and we have little savings to fall back upon. I think we'll hurt for a couple years, then things'll find a new level of "normal".
wow! guess nobody posting is on a fixed income (i.e., retired)!
Off-topic, but I hate that phrase: "on a fixed income". With a few exceptions (i.e., salespeople who work on commission), we're ALL on a fixed income. Some are fixed higher, some are fixed lower. My boss pays me the same thing every month -- most people's bosses do. But people use the phrase "on a fixed income" to mean on a LOW income. Rant over.
I don't really understand this idea that it's the news' fault and everything is really just fine. When I go to the store and milk is $4.29 a gallon where it was $3.59 a gallon a few weeks ago, that's not a Jedi mind trick perpetrated by the liberals at MSNBC, that's reality.
You're exactly right, but I also understand where people are coming from when they say that the media
just loves to "create" problems where none really exist. And by doing that, they can actually make things worse. The economy, of course, REALLY DOES have problems -- I personally know quite a few well-educated, hard working men who are out of work (no women, wonder why?). That's real.
I see a continuous decline in the American middle class life style. More and more people are falling out of the middle class into the lower class due to lower salaries, increased health care costs, and higher day-to-day living expenses.
I disagree -- somewhat. We've
raised our idea of what a middle-class family should have, and that makes it more difficult for people to fit into the mold. My husband's grandmother raised three children in a two-bedroom house/one bath house without air conditioning (I believe her children were all born in the 1940s). Three children shared a bedroom. The family owned one car, one TV, and one phone. Mom stayed home, cooked, sewed, and was frugal with her husband's paycheck. She has only been out of the state a few times in her whole life. My grandmother lived in a more rural area and had more land, but she raised her two children in much the same way; I believe they had a few more vacations, etc. -- maybe they were middle-middle class while my husband's grandmother was lower-middle class.
Today's average house is more than twice the size of that house. Once the children are old enough to drive, it's usual to have cars even for the teens. TVs, ipods, and other electronics -- even for those of us who are frugal -- waiver in that gray area between want and need. Few of us in the South do without air conditioning. We eat out, we travel, we shop. Even "poor kids" eat at restaurants, get loads of gifts at Christmas, and have themed birthday parties. Our middle class expectations are considerably higher than those of our middle-class counterparts only a few decades ago. I think a large portion of the problem is that we've come to expect so much more from life.
It's a vicious cycle. The less we buy, the less we can work, and the less we work the less disposible income we have.
I agree with that; however, we as a nation have over-spent for years now. We've consumed more than we needed, and we've gone into debt to do it. We've raised the economy to an artificial level, which cannot be sustained -- and now that we've reached this impossible-to-maintain level, we're hit with these gas prices, the housing crunch, and more. It's a matter of too many things coming together at once.
I am 31, I don't remember as many people going to college when I was in junior high and high school. It wasn't a given back then like it is now. There wasn't as much help with financial aid and figuring it all out if you didn't have help, now people have their hands out early. I am from the south, the girls from poor families got married and the boys joined the military.
I'm also from the South, and I'm 42. I could say that very same things: when I graduated from high school, only about 20 kids from my class of 160 or so went to college; about half of us graduated. In my area most people weren't
poor, but they were from farming families and were raised to be very frugal. The idea of borrowing to go to college wouldn't have occured to them -- it never even crossed my mind, even when the financial aid people suggested it. Instead, I worked hard and did without things. That's just the way we did it -- goodness, I sound old!
Fast forward today: I teach high school, and the vast majority of my students DO attend college. Of course, my students aren't going to inherit farms either -- most of my high school classmates did. One HUGE thing to note, though, going to college isn't the same thing as graduating from college. Today we've set up a set of false expectations that EVERYONE should go to college. Many, many, many of those students have no business being there; they'd have been better off going to a trade school. I can't tell you how many of my students will tell you that they hate school, never study, are doing just enough to get by . . . but, oh, yes! They're going to college. And they're borrowing to do it. Those are the ones who become one-semester wonders, and that's no favor to anyone. Some of these students would've been better off waiting a couple years for some maturity to set in, THEN they could've done a good job in college. Others simply aren't academic, and there's no use pretending that they're going to be successful in college. Years ago we decided that everyone should have equal chances, but around that same time we quit being being realistic about certain things.
If you have to spend your savings to continue your lifestyle then all you are really doing is delaying the change.
I have to agree. Savings should be used for planned expenditures like vacations or a new TV . . . or to see you through emergencies like a busted transmission . . . or to see you through tight times like a job lay-off. But if you're forced to REGULARLY withdraw money from savings to pay your monthly bills, you're going to eventually run out. If that's the case, you have two options: 1) spend less or 2) earn more.
Dh and I were talking last night. We can sent items to Mars and get photos back from there. But we still need oil for our cars gasoline?!?!?!? Its a mess and we need an incentive to get out from under it.
Call me crazy, but I think we need to QUIT taking pictures of Mars (and quit a few other things too) and invest in some alternative energy sources and some infastructure to provide mass transit to those who us who don't currently have access to it.