Thank you for this post. This is a lot how I feel. I think I made the right decision, but I do sometimes question it.
If you feel you made the right decision, than you just need to continue to be confident in that. Lots of people make the same decision. If the teachers agree and you and dh are on the same page, then you have to do what's right for you.
janey99 said:
DS was young. He is 7 now and entering third grade - he won't be 8 until the end of October.
If I had it to do all over again, I can't decide if I would have held him back. We moved to the US from abroad and we didn't realize that some people hold their kids back on purpose (for sports??!!), so not only is he younger than the alleged "average" kid in his year, he's almost 2 years younger than some other kids held back on purpose for no reason although they are the right age for the year ahead. (a whole other thread - should parents be allowed to game the system this way?)
He was fine in kg, but struggled a bit in first grade - reading did not come as easily to him, and he ended up in extra reading classes and extra writing classes to improve his fine motor skills. This made him sad because he was pulled out of regular classroom activities to do these, and he felt like he was missing things. Second grade was a little better, and he cycled out of special reading and math, and into a regular reading group. He is an only child, so he spends lots of time interacting with adults and is very verbal. We have also discovered he is very bright at science and math. His confidence is very good now.
Going into third grade, I think he is in good shape. My colleague's DH is a teacher and he has said they all catch up by third grade, and it seems true in our case. I have worked with him over the summer, to do math sheets and silent reading, so he didn't lose skills, and that seems to have helped too.
Finally, we always make sure teachers know his age - his second grade teacher asked him his age early in the year, and he told her, and she thought he must have some "issue" because he told her he was 6, but she didn't believe he could be 6, and therefore he must not know his own age! She also admitted that she had been thinking he might be delayed, but in the context of his true age, he was fine.
I guess the take away from my ramble is that you have to judge this issue in the context of your own child, and not be afraid to zig and zag to make it work for him or her.
Good luck,
Jane
Well, I'm going to disagree a bit with the concept that kids catch up by third. While I realize that might be true for some kids, that's also when I notice that kids who have "been hanging in there" fall apart. That's when the textbooks become more difficult and concepts are harder.
While I also agree with the concept that the teacher should have an awareness of the child's age (although, believe me, I'm sure they already do), that's not going to change what the expectations are. Tecahers can't say, well this child is young, so we'll adapt standards. Especially with No Child Left Behind, there is much less discretion on the part of teachers. Students need to make certain standards, regardless of age.
As for the concept of kids being held back for no discernable reason........you really have no way of knowing the reasons why people do things. I held my dd back. If you met her now, you would think I was an idiot for doing so.....she participates in a ton of activities, is a top student, is independent, mature, confident.........but at 4, she was extremely shy, passive and both the preschool teacher and incoming K teacher recommended an extra year. In retrospect, did I blow it? Maybe. On the other hand, would she be doing as well as she if she were the youngest? I do know that in dd's class, of all the "young ones" (fall birthdays, there were 5) only one is successful academically. (and she really works very hard for it.....I know the mom) The other 3 struggle, seldom if ever make honor roll, and so on. The 5th had to leave the school, because she struggles academically and socially.
I can't comment on holding kids back for the sports issue, as I have never heard of anyone doing that. I'm sure it has happened, and will happen, but I wouldn't assume that most parents would make a decision for that reason.
Obviously, not all young to start kids have issues. One of my friends daughters is a fall birthday, and a preemie to boot, and is as bright as they come...in AP classes in high school and so on.
Just some differing opinions.
Julia